Skip to content

Update: BOMBSHELL: BING WEST to OBAMA: “WHERE’S THE EXECUTION ORDER?”

January 24, 2013

 

Closer look at the president’s role in Libya aftermath

What was he doing during and after attack?

GRETA ASKS WEST:

McCain Presses Hillary for More Information:

…………………………….

@ minute 5:22 on the Greata video… West explains in clear concise language the chain of command when the president gives an Execute Order to the Joint Chiefs. The Generals are saying this Order was never given to them to send help to the distressed Americans in Libya.

Although now, Obama is saying HE GAVE the ORDER to send HELP.

West says the chain of command goes this way : “The president “GIVES THE ORDER”, the ORDER is written down by the National Security Council Adviser”… and the Joint Chiefs follow through deciding what assets from where will be sent to help out Americans in distress.

What Bing West is saying is, He wants to see the written order to execute the president’s directive to send HELP to Benghazi… supposedly, now, what Obama is claiming IS, he did GIVE THE ORDER to send HELP when our Ambassador was pleading for help.

All West is saying is …WHERE IS THAT WRITTEN ORDER? WE WANT TO SEE IT! Mr. President.. produce the ORDER!

West also let the cat out of the bag- @ 4:33 Hillary did send help (in spite of the stand down order) The State Dept did send a plane carrying 6 Americans to help the distressed Ambassador and the 3 former Seals who risked all to protect the Ambassador. (I just knew it..I just did.. I hope this shocker puts all the judgmental naysayers to SHAME!)

NOW THIS VIDEO NEEDS TO GO VIRAL!

anyone reading this… PLEASE, send this video to every blog you know and get this information out there… The military is willing to stand up to OBAMA.. PLEASE HELP THEM DO IT!

……………………………………

MEDIA IGNORE HILLARY’S BOMBSHELL BENGHAZI CLAIM

by Aaron Klein

Aaron Klein is WND’s senior staff reporter and Jerusalem bureau chief. He also hosts “Aaron Klein Investigative Radio” on New York’s WABC Radio.

JERUSALEM – During the Senate hearing on Benghazi yesterday, outgoing Secretary of State Hillary Clinton claimed she did not know whether the U.S. special mission attacked on Sept. 11 was involved in gun-running.

The remarks were perhaps the most important and telling of the entire hearing since they address a possible motive behind the jihadist attacks.

Yet Clinton’s answers were largely unreported by U.S. news media.

The exchange on the subject took place with Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky.

Paul asked Clinton: “Is the U. S. involved with any procuring of weapons, transfer of weapons, buying, selling, anyhow transferring weapons to Turkey out of Libya?

“To Turkey?” Clinton asked. “I will have to take that question for the record. Nobody has ever raised that with me.”

Continued Paul: “It’s been in news reports that ships have been leaving from Libya and that may have weapons, and what I’d like to know is the annex that was close by, were they involved with procuring, buying, selling, obtaining weapons, and were any of these weapons being transferred to other countries, any countries, Turkey included?”

Clinton replied, “Well, senator, you’ll have to direct that question to the agency that ran the annex. I will see what information is available.”


“You’re saying you don’t know?” asked Paul.
“I do not know,” Clinton said. “I don’t have any information on that.”

That section of the exchange with Paul was almost entirely ignored by media, which instead focused on the Republican senator’s earlier statement that if he were president he would have relieved Clinton of her post.

WND has filed numerous reports quoting Middle East security officials who describe the mission in Benghazi as a meeting place to coordinate aid for the rebel-led insurgencies in the Middle East.

In September, WND also broke the story that the slain U.S. ambassador, Christopher Stevens, played a central role in recruiting jihadists to fight Bashar al-Assad’s regime in Syria, according to Egyptian security officials.

In November, Middle Eastern security sources further described both the U.S. mission and nearby CIA annex in Benghazi as the main intelligence and planning center for U.S. aid to the rebels that was being coordinated with Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Qatar.

Many rebel fighters are openly members of terrorist organizations, including al-Qaida.

Among the tasks performed inside the building was collaborating with countries, most notably Turkey, on the recruitment of fighters – including jihadists – to target Assad’s regime, the security officials said.

According to the 39-page report released last month by independent investigators probing the attacks at the diplomatic facility, the U.S. mission in Benghazi was set up without the knowledge of the new Libyan government, as WND reported.


“Another key driver behind the weak security platform in Benghazi was the decision to treat Benghazi as a temporary, residential facility, not officially notified to the host government, even though it was also a full-time office facility,” the report states. “This resulted in the Special Mission compound being excepted from office facility standards and accountability under the Secure Embassy Construction and Counterterrorism Act of 1999 (SECCA) and the Overseas Security Policy Board (OSPB).”

The report, based on a probe led by former U.S. diplomat Thomas Pickering, calls the facility a “Special U.S. Mission.”

During the Libyan revolution against Moammar Gadhafi’s regime, the U.S. admitted to directly arming the rebel groups.

At the time, rebel leader Abdel-Hakim al-Hasidi acknowledged in an interview that a significant number of the Libyan rebels were al-Qaida fighters, many of whom had fought U.S. troops in Iraq and Afghanistan.

He insisted his fighters “are patriots and good Muslims, not terrorists,” but he added that the “members of al-Qaida are also good Muslims and are fighting against the invader.”

Media cover up?


From the beginning, U.S. media reports on the events in Benghazi have been misleading.

The vast majority of media coverage worldwide refers to the U.S. facility that was attacked as a “consulate,” even though the government itself has been careful to call it a “mission.”

A consulate typically refers to the building that houses a consul, who is the official representative of the government of one state in the territory of another. The U.S. consul in Libya, Jenny Cordell, works out of the embassy in Tripoli.

Consulates at times function as junior embassies, providing services related to visas, passports and citizen information.

On Aug. 26, about two weeks before his was killed, Ambassador Stevens attended a ceremony marking the opening of consular services at the Tripoli embassy.

The main role of a “consulate” is to foster trade with the host and care for its own citizens who are traveling or living in the host nation.

Diplomatic missions, on the other hand, maintain a more generalized role. A diplomatic mission is simply a group of people from one state or an international inter-governmental organization present in another state to represent matters of the sending state or organization in the receiving state.

However, according to the State Department investigation, the building was a “U.S. Special Mission” set up without the knowledge of the Libyan government.

Withholding, misleading


Two days before the November presidential election, CBS posted additional portions of a Sept. 12 “60 Minutes” interview in which Obama made statements that contradicted his earlier claims about the attack.

In the released portions of the interview, Obama would not say whether he thought the attack was terrorism. Yet he would later emphasize at a presidential debate that in the Rose Garden on the day of the attack, he had declared it an act of terror.

Reuters was also implicated by WND for possibly false reporting.

In the immediate aftermath of the attack, Reuters quoted a purported civilian protester by his first name who described a supposedly popular demonstration against an anti-Muhammad film outside the U.S. building.

Immediately following the attack, President Obama and other White House officials claimed anti-American sentiment fueled by the obscure anti-Muhammad video on YouTube sparked civilian protests outside the U.S. mission that devolved into a jihadist onslaught.

However, vivid accounts provided by the State Department and intelligence officials later made clear no such popular demonstration took place. Instead, video footage from Benghazi reportedly shows an organized group of armed men attacking the compound, officials said.

Link

………………………………

……………………………….

About these ads
215 Comments
  1. February 4, 2013 7:19 pm

    Arkansas House passes bill to allow guns in churches

    LITTLE ROCK, Ark (Reuters) – The Arkansas House of Representatives approved a bill on Monday to allow concealed-carry permit holders to take their weapons into churches, and it is expected to be signed into law by the state’s governor.

    The Church Protection Act would allow individual places of worship to decide whether to allow concealed handguns and who could carry them. The Republican-controlled House passed the bill 85-8 with bipartisan support. The measure previously passed the Republican-controlled Senate 28-4.

    Arkansas joins a handful of other states, including South Carolina, Wyoming and Louisiana, that allow guns in churches, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.

    Gun control and gun rights issues have dominated the public conversation since a gunman shot dead 20 children and six adults at an elementary school December 14 in Newtown, Connecticut.

    Arkansas Governor Mike Beebe, a Democrat, was expected to sign the bill into law. His spokesman, Matt DeCample, said that Beebe “wants to continue the discussion with lawmakers and church leaders this session.”

    “We’ve had members of the faith community reach out to us with concerns, particularly liability concerns for churches,” DeCample said.

    Nicholas Stehle, a member of the board of directors of the advocacy group Arkansas Carry said that it was a smart bill.

    “It was past time for the legislature to get out of the business of our churches, and it appears that at least 113 legislators agree,” Stehle said. “This pro-First Amendment bill gives churches that can’t afford private security staff the ability to provide a safe environment for their congregants.”

    Robert Klein, a minister at the Unitarian Universalist Church of Little Rock, was one of the religious leaders to express concern.

    “I speak only for myself, but I am opposed to anyone other than trained law enforcement professionals carrying guns into a church – and with them only when they are required to carry their weapons by their agency or are requested to do so by the congregation,” he said.

    He said that tensions are often high in religious communities including life stresses.

    “I want to offer those who come into congregations the safety and sanctuary that has traditionally served as a hallmark of congregations,” he said “To add the uncertainty about who might be carrying a weapon into the mix is an unnecessary and inappropriate result of this legislation.”

    Former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee, who was once a Southern Baptist minister, told Reuters that guns had saved lives in some churches. “A couple of cases – the church in Colorado where a crazed shooter was stopped by an off-duty deputy who had her gun – probably saved a lot of lives,” he said.

    Huckabee was apparently referring to a case in Aurora, Colorado last April in which a man crashed his car outside the church, and then shot and killed the pastor’s mother, who had come out to help. The man was then shot and killed by an off-duty Denver police officer who was a member of the church, according to the Denver Post.

    http://ca.news.yahoo.com/arkansas-house-passes-bill-allow-guns-churches-235026007.html

    ……………………………………

    Good! Muslim extremists start shooting Christians in Arkansas churches, well, they’re in for a surprise… tout de suite

  2. February 5, 2013 10:09 am

    Chris Kyle’s Killer Was In and Out of Mental Hospital

    Eddie Ray Routh, an Iraq War Veteran, has been charged with murdering Chris Kyle, the well-known former Navy SEAL sniper, and Kyle’s friend Chad Littlefield. Routh had been in and out of a mental hospital for the last five months.

    Last September 2, Routh was taken to a Green Oaks Hospital because he threatened to murder his family and himself. When he was found walking shirtless and shoeless, Routh informed police he was a Marine veteran with post-traumatic stress disorder. Routh’s mother said that Routh had been drinking, went haywire when his father threatened to sell Routh’s gun, and suicidally said he was going to “blow his brains out.” In January, a woman called police, worried about Routh hurting himself, and Routh was taken back to Green Oaks Hospital

    After Routh killed Kyle and Littlefield, he took Kyle’s truck. He drove to his sister’s house, confessed the murders, and told her that he had “traded his soul for a new truck.” His sister called police, who chased him down after he fled his sister’s house.

    In jail, Routh has exhibited the same signs of mental illness, trying to assault jailers who wanted to retrieve his food tray, and consequently being subdued by a stun gun. He is being held in solitary confinement with his arms and legs restrained.

    http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/02/04/Killer-Of-Chris-Kyle-Was-In-And-Out-Of-Mental-Hospital

    ………………………

    I doubt Chris Kyle was aware he was playing with fire every time he faced friend Eddie Arouth while he was holding a gun.
    Is Obama deliberately ignoring this obvious common thread existent as a fundamental anomaly in all the shooters?

    Obama’s gun control proposal taking guns away from law abiding citizens is not the solution. Yet, he has surrounded himself with an emotionally charged incident as the template for his recommendations. How convenient! Separating mentally healthy people from using deadly force as the only way to protect their families and private property exposing the country to mass humanicide.

    Seems like Obama is aiding an abetting potential criminals who will find a way to buy black market guns because they have a mind predisposed to killing innocent people.

    NO THANKS!

  3. February 5, 2013 4:04 pm

    It isn’t guns it is sick people that is the problem. :)

  4. February 5, 2013 6:59 pm

    Thats right, foxi.. not a convenient subject for him.. I don’t think treatment for Mental Health victims is covered by ObamaCare..

    Somebody should pick up on that little factoid and create a flap about it… Easier pointing to guns as responsible for Sandy Hook tragedy.

    NEW ARTICLE IS UP!

  5. February 10, 2013 7:10 pm

    EXCLUSIVE: David Petraeus was brought down after betrayal by vengeful CIA agents and his own bodyguards who made sure his affair was exposed, claims new book

    (perhaps- following orders issued by the CIC)

    David Petraeus was betrayed by his own bodyguards and vengeful high-ranking enemies in the CIA, who made sure his affair with his biographer was exposed to the public, a new book claims.

    MailOnline can reveal a new angle on the story that rocked Washington last fall. It comes from two retired special operations commandos – a Navy SEAL and a Green Beret – who say they discovered a plot against the former CIA director while doing research about the attacks on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2276139/David-Petraeus-CIA-directors-bodyguards-exposed-affair-Paula-Broadwell-claims-Benghazi-The-Definitive-Report.html#ixzz2KTdyIlQX

Comments are closed.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 34 other followers

%d bloggers like this: