Major Hasan reportedly has a security clearance which allows him to receive secret information. All US Army officers are required to have at minimum a secret-level security clearance, and Major Hasan’s clearance might even have been at the more stringent top secret level. All indications are that Major Hasan’s clearance was never reviewed, despite his ostentatious antics. Major Hasan’s aberrant behavior should at the very least have put him in line for a National Agency Check or NAC. Newsweek writes that ‘extended NACs, which the officials indicated are more likely for would-be military officers, would include checks of local and state police records in jurisdictions where the subject lived, as well as credit-bureau and financial-record checks. In the event that some kind of “derogatory” information turns up during these checks, one of the officials said, field investigators are likely to be sent out to conduct interviews, and the procedure could also include an interview with the security-clearance applicant.’[28] This puts Major Hasan in a very special category, subject to special rules and surveillance which are enforced by specific agencies, and not by military physicians of whatever rank. Perhaps the most direct evidence that Major Hasan was a protected patsy was the fact that he could make incendiary speeches and correspond with self-proclaimed “al Qaeda” firebrands without having his security clearance reviewed, to say nothing of lifted.

As a well informed Stratfor letter to the editor posting points out: “The contacting of a foreign Islamic militant who openly espouses killing of Americans is, in and of itself, is a violation of U.S. security regulations with respect to individuals with security clearances. Hasan’s foreign contact should have been reported through the chain-of- command to his commander. Lt. Gen. Cone, in consultation with his G-2, Counter-Intelligence Staff Officer,Personnel Security Officer and the CID, could have immediately suspended Maj. Hasan’s security clearance subject to a local AR 15-6 investigation. Lt. Gen. Cone is responsible for force protection of assets in his command, not a DoD criminal investigator. A minimally competent investigation would have uncovered other comments and actions that would probably have resulted in adverse command action on Maj. Hasan’s security clearance and possibly led to charges being brought for conduct unbecoming an officer.”[29] But the usual rules were suspended for Majopr Hasan, indicating that he belonged to a special class of persons – patsies who were being groomed for future actions and therefore had to be kept out of trouble.

LIKE ATTA AND KSM, THE DEVOUT MAJOR HASAN LIKES STRIP CLUBS

Thanks to the investigative work of Daniel Hopsicker, it has been revealed that key 9/11 figure Mohammed Atta was no devout and puritanical Moslem, but a hedonist. The legendary Khalid Sheikh Mohammed (KSM), touted by the controlled media as the “9/11 mastermind,” was also devoted to alcohol, floozies, and nightlife. It is striking that Major Hasan, allegedly a rigid and doctrinaire Moslem, also conforms to this model. Patsies working for or manipulated by the de facto Islamic fundamentalist directorate of Anglo-American intelligence seem to share the same decadent western foibles. One of Major Hasan’s favorite relaxations was to attend the local strip club: ‘Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan came into the Starz strip club not far from the base at least three times in the past month, the club’s general manager, Matthew Jones, told FoxNews.com. Army investigators building their case against Hasan plan to interview Jones soon. “The last time he was here, I remember checking his military ID at the door, and he paid his $15 cover and stayed for six or seven hours,” Jones, 37, said. Jennifer Jenner, who works at Starz using the stage name Paige, said Hasan bought a lap dance from her two nights in a row. She said he paid $50 for a dance lasting three songs in one of the club’s private rooms on Oct. 29 and Oct. 30. She recalled that he arrived at about 6:30 p.m. and stayed until 2 a.m. She said he brought in a six pack of light beer, took only a few sips from one can and gave the rest to the strippers. “He preferred the blondes,” said Jenner, whose hair was dyed blond at the time. “He said he was a medic and that he was being deployed soon, but mostly he wanted to ask us questions.”’[30] Needless to say, alcohol and strippers do not an Islamic fundamentalist make.

As for prominent 9/11 figure Atta, he was in fact not a practicing Moslem at all, but rather a devotee of alcohol, cocaine, call girls, and pork chops. Like Major Hasan, Atta preferred blondes, specifically pink strawberry ones. He cohabited with a 22-year old call girl who may also have been a sex operative for one of the intelligence agencies. Amanda Keller worked for a “lingerie model escort service” in Sarasota called Fantasies & Lace. Atta loved to attend topless bars, where he would order lap dances at the Pink Pony, or else stuff twenty dollar bills into the g-strings of the dancers at the Olympic Garden nightclub. He was also a regular at Harry’s Bar in Naples. Atta’s favorite nightspots were the Cheetah in Venice, and Margarita Maggie’s in Sarasota. FBI investigators showing around pictures of Atta after 9/11 found that he had been in a bar drinking Stolichnaya vodka for three hours quite recently; with him was accused suicide pilot Marwan al Shehhi, who preferred rum. Atta was also a frequent cocaine user. He would habitually snort rows of cocaine with a dollar bill. Are we therefore dealing here with two patsies from the same levy, two parallel patsy lives?

FROM ARMY-MCCARTHY TO ARMY-LIEBERMAN

The reactionaries of today yearn for the days of Senator Joe McCarthy (R-Wisconsin), who launched his campaign of red-baiting and witch-hunting some six decades ago. At the height of the Cold War, McCarthy launched the hysterical charge that the US Army had been massively infiltrated by agents of the international communist conspiracy. This led to the infamous and protracted Army-McCarthy hearings in the Senate, during which McCarthy’s influence reached its demagogic apex. Today, the neocons are still full of rancor and resentment over their wholesale ouster from the government through the end of the Bush-Cheney era, and the ascendancy of the Brzezinski-Nye-Soros faction of liberal imperialists who control Obama. Immediately after the shootings. Now, Senator Joe Lieberman has announced that he will use his homeland security subcommittee to investigate the failure of the intelligence agencies to connect the dots in the Fort Hood incident. Already, neocon web sites are contending that the US Army of the Obama era is thoroughly infiltrated by Islamic fundamentalists favorable to terrorism. Lieberman says he wants to know how the Army missed numerous warning signs about Hasan’s radical views. The Army-Lieberman hearings may soon launch an anti-Moslem witch hunt in the US military, fulfilling much neocon nostalgia. The best approach would be to empanel a genuinely independent board of inquiry to investigate the Fort Hood massacre. Care should be taken to avoid the begging of the question and the blatant conflicts of interest which made the recent Kean-Hamilton 9/11 commission such a mockery. Care should also be taken to keep the inevitable Lee Hamilton out of any board of inquiry, given his wretched track record of cover-up and misprision.

FORT HOOD MOSLEM CLERIC TO MAJOR HASAN: “THERE’S SOMETHING WRONG WITH YOU”

The London Daily Telegraph interviewed Osman Danquah, a local Moslem clergyman, who had contact with Major Hasan. Osman Danquah had come to the conclusion that Major Hasan had debilitating mental problems, and was not suitable for any leadership roles – even though he was an Army officer of the middle rank. Citing several sources, this paper writes: ‘What does seem clear is that the army missed an increasing number of red flags that Hasan was a troubled and brooding individual within its ranks. “I was shocked but not surprised by news of Thursday’s attack,” said Dr Val Finnell, a fellow student on a public health course in 2007-08 who heard Hasan equate the war on terrorism to a war on Islam. Another student had warned military officials that Hasan was a “ticking time bomb” after he reportedly gave a presentation defending suicide bombers…. Osman Danquah, the co-founder of the Islamic Community of Greater Killeen, said Hasan never expressed anger toward the army or indicated any plans for violence. But he said that, at their second meeting, Hasan seemed almost incoherent. “I told him, ‘There’s something wrong with you’. I didn’t get the feeling he was talking for himself, but something just didn’t seem right.” He was sufficiently troubled that he recommended the centre reject Hasan’s request to become a lay Muslim leader at Fort Hood .’[31]
The pathos Major Hasan’s existence is perhaps most clearly portrayed in his unsuccessful effort to find a wife of his own faith: ‘Relatives said that the death of Hasan’s parents, in 1998 and 2001, turned him more devout. “After he lost his parents he tried to replace their love by reading a lot of books, including the Koran,” his uncle Rafiq Hamad said. “He didn’t have a girlfriend, he didn’t dance, he didn’t go to bars.” His failed search for a wife seemed to haunt Hasan. At the Muslim Community Centre in the Washington suburb of Silver Spring, he signed up for an Islamic matchmaking service, specifying that he wanted a bride who wore the hijab and prayed five times a day.” Major Hasan returned repeatedly and obsessively to the same theme, according to a another acquaintance: “Adnan Haider, a retired professor of statistics, recalled how at their first meeting last year, a casual introduction after Friday prayers, Hasan immediately asked the academic if he knew “a nice Muslim girl” he could marry. “It was a strange thing to ask someone you have met two seconds before. It was clear to me he was under pressure, you could just see it in his face,” said Prof Haider, 74, who used to work at Georgetown University in Washington . “You could see he was lonely and didn’t have friends.[32]

WAS MAJOR HASAN BRAINWASHED?

Given the accumulated evidence that Major Hasan was possibly psychotic, there remains the question of whether this psychosis might have been endogenous and due to natural and spontaneous causes, or whether it had been artificially produced in him through a program of brainwashing and heavy-duty “Clockwork Orange” psychological manipulation by others. We cannot exclude the possibility that Major Hasan went out on November 5 consciously determined to kill, and may also have discharged his weapons. We thus have two possible scenarios: on the one hand Major Hasan the duped patsy caught totally by surprise when the shooting started, and on the other, Major Hasan the psychotic and criminally insane killer who possessed the will, if not necessarily the ability, for serious shooting. There may be evidence for both scenarios.. We should also point out that seeing Major Hasan is a psychotic killer in his own right does not in any way rule out the presence of additional and more capable shooters. We are reminded here of the case of Sirhan Sirhan, who appears to have fired at Robert Kennedy, but who also appears to have received a powerful assist from some other as yet unidentified more expert shooter who may have actually fired the lethal bullet.

MAJOR HASAN’S VIRGINIA TECH CONNECTION

Where would Major Hasan have been brainwashed? An obvious place to look would be the precincts of Virginia Tech, the home of Cho Seung-Hui, the alleged mass killer of 32 students and professors along with himself in April 2007. This incident involves far too many unanswered questions to be addressed in detail here. In any case, the fact that Major Hasan graduated from the alma mater of Cho should be enough by itself to raise some red flags. We should also recall that several additional homicides have occurred in and around Virginia Tech during the last year. In January 2009, a Virginia Tech doctoral student beheaded a fellow student in a campus cafe. In this incident, a female graduate student who had just arrived from China was killed when another graduate student she knew attacked her with a knife and decapitated her.[33] Beheadings are rare on American college campuses even today, so this is an extraordinary event indeed. In August 2009, two Virginia Tech University students were found murdered at a Jefferson National Forest campground that is a popular hangout for students. The bodies of David Lee Metzler, 19, of Lynchburg and Heidi Lynn Childs, 18, of Forest were found by a passerby.[34]

So what in the world is going on in or near Blacksburg , Virginia ? The report on the Virginia Tech slayings prepared by a special commission set up by Virginia Governor Tim Kane covers up the failure of mental health professionals in and around Virginia Tech to take effective action in regard to Cho, whom they had nevertheless recognized to be a profoundly disturbed and potentially highly dangerous personality. This report commits the usual fallacy of petition principi, begging the question, and assumes from the start that Cho was the sole shooter.[35] Because of this failure to account for numerous salient features of the Cho incident, this entire case must continue to be classified as unsolved. We must therefore conclude this essay merely by citing one of the many clues which the Virginia investigation chose to ignore, but which might begin to account for the extraordinary number of homicides observed in the area of Blacksburg Virginia . As a somewhat obscure website alleges in an unconfirmed report, “Blacksburg, VA houses a US government ABOVE TOP SECRET underground laboratory (in the side of a local Blacksburg mountain) that develops in conjunction with DARPA [Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency], weapons such as human robotic mind control programming.”[36] Does such a facility exist, and what does it do? At this point, any further comment would be pure speculation.

We cannot be optimistic that, should he survive, a future trial of Major Hasan will clear up these questions, any more than criminal trials established the real facts in the cases of Sirhan Sirhan, Hinckley, McVeigh, or John Allen Muhammad. What does appear confirmed as of now is the existence of a mutating model of terrorism alongside the large-scale 9/11 or WMD paradigms of false flag manipulation seen and propagandized during the last decade. In this sense, Major Hasan represents the evolution of the figures of Cho, and also of Steven P. Kazmierczak, the Northern Illinois University shooter of February 2008. As I wrote last year, “The new model is Virginia Tech gunman Cho, a mentally disturbed or brainwashed mass killer. Another case was that of Steven P. Kazmierczak, who in mid-February 2008 shot 21 people and killed five of them at Northern Illinois University in Dekalb. Kazmierczak was described as being intensely concerned with “corrections, political violence, and peace and social justice.”[37]

Will the American public ever learn to see through and reject false flag operations, as many Spaniards were able to do after the Madrid bombs? Will Americans ever swear off the dangerous habit of being duped? Will opinion leaders ever master the rather elementary methods of rogue network, false-flag terrorism? Until this occurs and the gullibility of the public is reduced, such operations are likely to continue on scales both small and large, with incalculable consequences for the future of humanity.

:::: notes ::::

[28] Mark Hosenball, “Fort Hood Shooter: How Recently Was His Security Clearance Updated?” in Newsweek at http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/declassified/archive/2009/11/06/ft-hood-shooter-how-recently-was-his-security-clearance-updated.aspx

[29] http://www.stratfor.com/content/hasan_case_1

[30] http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,573052,00.html

[31] http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/6521758/Fort-Hood-shooting-Texas-army-killer-linked-to-September-11-terrorists.html

[32] http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/6521758/Fort-Hood-shooting-Texas-army-killer-linked-to-September-11-terrorists.html

[33] http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/2009/01/22/2009-01-22_virginia_tech_graduate_student_attacked_.html

[34] http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/27/virginia-tech-students-fo_n_270892.html

[35] http://www.governor.virginia.gov/TempContent/techpanelreport.cfm

[36] http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=6409

[37] Webster G. Tarpley, Obama The Postmodern Coup ( Joshua Tree CA : Progressive Press, 2008), p. 71.

By Webster G. Tarpley
14 November 2009

Part I – The Massacre go here and Part II – One Shooter or Three here

A more explicit and illuminating version of Major Hasan’s psychiatric review comes from National Public Radio. Here we find that he was variously evaluated as “disconnected, aloof, paranoid, belligerent, and schizoid.” This raised the problem of whether he was actually psychotic and thus suffering from severe mental illness: ‘Subsequent conversations about Hasan reportedly included John Bradley, chief of psychiatry at Walter Reed; Robert Ursano, chairman of the Psychiatry Department at USUHS; Charles Engel, assistant chair of the Psychiatry Department and director of Hasan’s psychiatry fellowship; Dr. David Benedek, another assistant chairman of psychiatry at USUHS; psychiatrist Carroll J. Diebold; and Scott Moran, director of the psychiatric residency program at Walter Reed, according to colleagues and other sources who monitor the meetings.’ [20] Why did this august panel not take any practical steps  in regard to Major Hasan? This account blames bureaucratic inertia and political correctness founded on the fear of seeming to discriminate against Moslems. But these reasons need to be supplemented with another possibility: that a witting mole (or moles) was shielding Major Hasan from any sanctions so he could go on to greater things as a witting or unwitting agent provocateur and patsy.

One comment included in this NPR account was especially ominous: “Another official reportedly wondered aloud to colleagues whether Hasan might be capable of committing fratricide, like the Muslim U.S. Army sergeant who, in 2003, killed two fellow soldiers and injured 14 others by setting off grenades at a base in Kuwait .” Despite such real and present dangers, nothing was done.

MAJOR HASAN’S MOSQUE LINKED TO THE CIA’S CHECHEN TERRORISTS

In recent years, Major Hasan attended a mosque in Silver Spring Maryland which hosted fundraising for CIA covert operations against Russia : “Imam Faizul Khan ministered to Hasan when he worshiped at the Muslim Community Center in Silver Spring , Md …. The Muslim Community Center has held fundraisers for Chechen jihadists, and promotes on its website a Shariah-based financial product offered by a Muslim Brotherhood front group under federal investigation.”[21] The essential element here is that the mosque was raising money for Chechen rebellion, which is notoriously a strategic tool of the United States and the United Kingdom against Russia . Perhaps such a fundraiser for Chechen terrorism might have been attended by Ilyas Achmadov, the de facto ambassador of the leading CIA-backed Chechen organization implicated in terrorism, who lives in Washington , DC at US taxpayer expense thanks to his sponsorship by Zbigniew Brzezinski, and the gray eminence of Obama’s foreign policy team.

The impression that Major Hasan was in fact a protected patsy is strengthened by reports that he frequented mosques which have figured in previous intelligence operations, and that he was in contact with an American-born Muslim cleric now living in Yemen who currently plays the role of one of the most bombastic agent provocateurs operating under the umbrella designation of “al Qaeda.”

ANWAR AWLAKI, PATSY MINDER FOR HANI HANJOUR OF 9/11 INFAMY

In earlier years, Hasan had worshipped with his mother at the radical Dar al-Hijrah Islamic Center in Falls Church , Va. During 2001, he worshipped there alongside some of the 9/11 patsies, specifically those alleged to have been aboard the aircraft which allegedly struck the Pentagon. The dominant figure of this mosque was at that time a certain Anwar Awlaki or Awlaqi, who must be regarded as an intelligence agency operative and patsy-minder, the latter because of his role in supervising the alleged Pentagon suicide pilot Hani Hanjour and other 9/11 figures who frequented the mosque. Hanjour, whose purported feats of flying would if true have placed him above the Red Baron in the Valhalla of air aces, was in fact a pathetic and clumsy nebbish.

Just after the Fort Hood massacre, Awlaki used his website for a bombastic endorsement of Major Hasan and the Texas slaughter, evidently designed with Pavlovian technique to goad Islamophobic US reactionaries into a frenzy and give the radio ogres much grist for their mill. Here is the relevant report from the New York Times: ‘Mr. Awlaki, an American citizen born in New Mexico to Yemeni parents, wrote on Monday on his English-language website that Mr. Hasan was “a hero.” The cleric said, “He is a man of conscience who could not bear living the contradiction of being a Muslim and serving in an army that is fighting against his own people.” He added, “The only way a Muslim could Islamically justify serving as a soldier in the U.S. Army is if his intention is to follow the footsteps of men like Nidal.”’[22] This was a piece of crude manipulation, and at the same time an engraved invitation to an anti-Moslem pogrom. The report went on: ‘But since leaving the U.S. in 2002 for London , and later Yemen , Mr. Awlaki has become a prominent proponent of militant Islam via his Web site, www.anwar-alawlaki.com. The Toronto Star reported last month that a group of young Canadians charged with plotting attacks against military and government targets were inspired, in part, by listening to Mr. Awlaki’s sermons online. In 2000 and 2001, Mr. Awlaki served as an imam at two mosques in the United States frequented by three future 9/11 hijackers. Khalid al-Midhar and Nawaf al-Hazmi attended the Rabat mosque in San Diego, where Mr. Awlaki later admitted meeting Hazmi several times but “claimed not to remember any specifics of what they discussed,” according to the report of the national 9/11 commission. Both Hazmi and another hijacker, Hani Hanjour, later attended the Dar al Hijra mosque in Falls, Church, Virginia after Mr. Awlaki had moved there in early 2001. The 9/11 commission report expressed “suspicion” about the coincidence, but said its investigators were unable to find Mr. Awlaki in Yemen to question him.’[23] We should notice the nice plug given here to Awlaki’s web site by the New York Times; his site traffic is sure to benefit enormously. Major Hasan had taken care to establish his devotion and fealty to Awlaki during the time leading up to the massacre. He left no doubt that he was a disciple of Awlaki: ‘Hasan’s eyes “lit up” when he mentioned his deep respect for al-Awlaki’s teachings, according to a fellow Muslim officer at the Fort Hood base in Texas, the scene of Thursday’s horrific shooting spree.’[24]

Major Hasan, it transpired, had also been exchanging emails with the fiery double agent he so much lionized; the imam-provocateur had fled abroad after 9/11and was now operating under “al Qaeda” cover from Yemen . According to one report: “two government officials, speaking on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the case on the record, said the Washington-based joint terrorism task force overseen by the FBI was notified of communications between Hasan and a radical imam overseas, and the information was turned over to a Defense Criminal Investigative Service employee assigned to the task force. The communications were gathered by investigators beginning in December 2008 and continuing into early this year. That Defense investigator wrote up an assessment of Hasan after reviewing the communications and the Army major’s personnel file, according to these officials. The assessment concluded Hasan did not merit further investigation — in large part because his communications with the imam were centered on a research paper about the effects of combat in Iraq and Afghanistan and the investigator determined that Hasan was in fact working on such a paper, the officials said. The disclosure Tuesday of the defense investigator’s role indicated that the U.S. military was aware of worrisome behavior by the massacre suspect long before the attack. Just hours later, a senior defense official, also demanding anonymity, directly contradicted that notion. The senior defense official said neither the Army nor any other part of the Defense Department knew of Hasan’s contacts with any Muslim extremists…. Military, law enforcement and intelligence agencies also are defending themselves against tough questions about what each of them knew about Hasan before he allegedly opened fire in a crowded room at the huge military base in Texas .” [25]

AWLAKI HELPED ENTRAP FORT DIX SIX, TORONTO DUPES

The decision of the Army to ignore Major Hasan’s correspondence with Awlaki is all the more astounding given Awlaki’s status as one of the premier terror impresarios of the age operating under Islamic fundamentalist cover. More than a mere ideologue, he is a recruiter and an entrepreneur of terror. His web site would not survive five minutes of concerted US cyber-attacks, but he is not disturbed in his role as a pied piper of patsies. In particular, Awlaki and his work were used to motivate and encourage groups of mentally impaired and suggestible young dupes who were entrapped into “terrorist plots” by busy FBI and Canadian RCMP agents during recent years, thus keeping the boogey man of Islamic terrorism in the public eye. ‘In addition to his contacts with Major Nidal Hasan, the radical American cleric, Anwar al Awlaki, served as an inspiration for men convicted in terror plots in Toronto and Fort Dix, New Jersey, according to government officials and court records reviewed by ABCNews.com….Despite his ties to other plots, including the one against the Army post at Fort Dix, some 20 e-mails between Awlaki and Major Hasan were dismissed as “innocent” by a military investigator working on the FBI’s Joint Terror Task Force in Washington, D.C….”He is not just a proselytizer but someone who is operational, with deep and longstanding connections to al Qaeda and has been for some time,” said a former senior American intelligence official who had access to classified information. Awlaki was characterized in court testimony as an inspiration by two of six Muslim immigrants convicted on conspiracy and other charges in a plot to kill U.S. military personnel at Fort Dix….In Toronto, members of the so-called Toronto 18 watched videos of Awlaki at a makeshift training camp where they allegedly planned an attack on the Canadian parliament and prime minister.’[26]

YET ANOTHER DELIBERATE FBI SNAFU

Just as in the 9/11 instance, the scandalous failure to connect the dots and round up the patsies was due to the non-feasance and malfeasance of the FBI, the criminally negligent agency which, according to 9/11 commission co-chair Gov. Thomas Kean, “failed and failed and failed,” but nevertheless escaped breakup after 9/11. Starting in 1996, the FBI had been aware that international terrorists were making a show of learning to fly passenger jets at U.S. flight schools, but took no action. According to a press report, the failure to inform Major Hasan’s superiors was the direct and specific responsibility of the FBI: “The Pentagon said it was never notified by US intelligence agencies that they had intercepted e-mails between of the alleged Fort Hood shooter and an extremist imam until after last week’s bloody assaults, raising new questions about whether the government could have helped prevent the attack…. a person familiar with the matter said a Pentagon worker on the terrorism task force overseen by the Federal Bureau of Investigation was told about the intercepted e-mails several months ago. But members of the terror task forces aren’t allowed to share such information with their agencies, unless they get permission from the FBI, which leads the task force. In this case, the Pentagon worker, an employee from the Defense Criminal Investigations Service,, helped make the assessment that Major Hasan wasn’t a threat, and the FBI’s ‘procedures for sharing the information were never used,’ said the person familiar with the matter.”[27] Those involved in this decision by FBI and the Defense Department need to be probed as possible terror moles. This is reminiscent of the FBI’s Dave Frasca, who could not assemble and act on the pre-9/11intelligence he had on his desk. This was a new chapter of the story of FBI sabotage told by Colleen Rowley and documented at the trial of Zacarias Moussaoui in 2006. If the FBI had rounded up the 9/11 patsies, the operation could not have occurred – not because the patsies were going to fly planes into buildings by themselves, but because the jailing of patsies before the fact would have made the targeting of the Moslem world impossible. In this sense, the same FBI rogue networks which made9/11 possible are still in place and still effectively sabotaging effective law enforcement.

:::: notes ::::

[20] Daniel Zwerdling, “Walter Reed Officials Asked: Was Hasan Psychotic?” National Public Radio, November 11, 2009, http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=120313570

[21] World Net Daily, 10 November 2009 , at http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=115465

[22] “U.S. Monitored Fort Hood Suspect Before Shooting,” New York Times, 9 November 2009 at http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33807907/ns/us_news-the_new_york_times/?ns=us_news-the_new_york_times

[23] http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33807907/ns/us_news-the_new_york_times/?ns=us_news-the_new_york_times

[24] http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/6521758/Fort-Hood-shooting-Texas-army-killer-linked-to-September-11-terrorists.html

[25] http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091110/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/us_fort_hood_shooting

[26] ABC News, “From Yemen, Anwar Awlaki Helped Inspire Fort Dix, Toronto Plots

Despite Terror Connections, E-mails with Major Hasan Did Not Raise Red Flags” at http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/anwar-awlakis-terrror-ties/story?id=9055322

http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/anwar-awlakis-terrror-ties/Story?id=9055322&page=1

[27] Yochi J. Dreazen and Evan Perez, “Army Wasn’t Told of Hasan’s Emails,” Wall Street Journal, 11 November 2009.

:::: MORE TO COME TOMORROW ::::

By Webster G. Tarpley
14 November 2009

If you are just tuning in, you can read the first episode of Mr Tarpley’s article here: NIDAL MALIK HASAN: A MAJOR PATSY IN A DRILL GONE LIVE AT FORT HOOD?

One Shooter, or Three?

How many shooters were there? Early reports indicated that there were at least one, and perhaps two, in addition to Major Hasan. Dow Jones newswires reported at about 5 PM Eastern Time: “A second gunman is in custody after a shooting at the Army’s Fort Hood in Texas in which at least seven people were killed and 12 wounded, reports KCEN-TV of Waco. The report comes about two hours after a first suspect was captured, shortly after gunfire broke out.”[10] According to the Dow Jones report cited, shooting had occurred in two separate locations on the Fort Hood base: “The incident reportedly began at Fort Hood ’s theater and then moved to the Soldier Readiness Processing Center , Killeen City Public Information Officer Hillary Shine told Fox News.” According to an AP wire, these facts were also announced by an official Army spokesman at the base: “The spokesman, Lieutenant Colonel Nathan Banks, says two shooters were apparently involved. There is no word yet on who they were, nor on identities of the dead. Banks says the second incident took place at a theater on the sprawling base.” [11] Many of the embarrassing reports about multiple shooters have been purged after the fact from websites, but a few have survived, as in the case of this Wisconsin radio station, where we read that the triple assassin theory had been embraced by the commander of the base: “Newsradio 620 WTMJ: Lt. General Bob Cone at Fort Hood confirms 12 dead, 31 hurt in shooting. Soldier gunman killed. 2 others in custody.”[12] During the later afternoon, cable television talked of three shooters, and in the London Daily Mirror account we find: “Twelve people were killed and 31 wounded when three gunmen in uniform opened fire at the US Army’s largest armoured base in Texas yesterday. One gunman was shot by civilian police and the two others held at Fort Hood .”[13]

GEN. CONE BRINGS MAJOR HASAN BACK FROM THE DEAD AFTER 8 HOURS

It was only in the late evening that the official lone assassin version of these events was assembled in another press conference by General Cone held about eight hours after the shooting had started: “ KILLEEN , Texas (KXAN/AP/MSNBC) – Twelve died and another 31 were hurt in a mass shooting on Fort Hood that stunned the nation on Thursday. Accused gunman Major Malik Nidal Hasan is alive and in stable condition, Lt. Gen. Bob Cone said at a Thursday evening news conference just outside the storied military post – the largest in the United States . Counter to initial reports, the 39-year-old psychiatrist – who was thought to be killed by local police – is hospitalized and not expected to die of multiple gunshots wounds sustained during the 1:30 p.m. attack. The local police officer who allegedly shot Hasan and injured him is in the hospital also in stable condition.”[14]

In the course of the day, we had thus gone from three shooters to only one. The separate shooting incident at the Howze theater on the post reported earlier had also been expunged in the process. Most remarkable of all was the ability of Major Hasan to come back from the dead after eight hours in which the world had been assured of his demise. Such resurrection is of course a physical impossibility for mere mortals. When individuals are alleged to have performed deeds which are physically impossible in the world as we know it, from Oswald’s feats of shooting to Atta’s (and Hani Hjanjour’s) feats of flying, we must become suspicious that intelligence agencies are assisting the probable patsies in hidden ways. Major Hasan is said to have fired more than 100 rounds using the two pistols he is alleged to have carried. This seems like a lot of shooting for a single person surrounded by scores of trained combat veteran soldiers, even if these latter had not been carrying their usual weapons.

The categorical imperative for every patsy is to get noticed, and to call attention to himself or herself pointedly and repeatedly, by hook or by crook. They must stand out so much that they will be remembered by many ordinary people after the process of their demonization has been launched. In order to fulfill their function, patsies must leave a trail of clues and evidence which will tie themselves and the larger target group they supposedly represent to the heinous actions they will shortly be accused of having committed. Oswald handed out leaflets sympathetic to Cuba and told a television audience that he was a Marxist. He went to the USSR, and tried to go to Cuba. Atta cultivated a frightening stare, and took time to argue ostentatiously about a parking place at an airport in Maine while he allegedly thought he was on his way to death. Major Hasan seems to have some of the same strange proclivities. On the day of the shooting, Major Hasan made sure there was no doubt about his religious loyalties by donning a trademark “Islamic” white robe and skull cap to go to his local Seven-Eleven, where he was sure to be filmed by the security cameras there. This footage was then played on all the networks for the next 48 hours. This gesture recalls the Koran Atta left in his car at Boston ’s Logan airport. When the FBI located Atta’s rented car, they found a copy of the Koran, airline schedules, terrorist literature and videotapes, and Atta’s crudely forged last will and testament in the luggage – all obviously and crudely left behind to make the necessary point. Atta’s will betrayed the amateurish attempt of some half-baked area specialist to sound Islamic

At Fort Hood , Major Hasan ‘told a colleague, Col Terry Lee, that he believed Muslims should rise up against American “aggressors.”’ [15] Count de Borchgrave points out that Major Hasan had made at least one overtly ominous statement just before the shooting spree: ‘As the Virginia-born major told a female neighbor in his apartment complex, “I’m going to do good work for God.”’[16] The neighbor would not forget that grim pledge anytime soon. Major Hasan was suspected of having authored internet postings that compared suicide bombers with soldiers who throw themselves on hand grenades to save others, although here we must be cautious, since these postings could have been made by imposters. All accounts agree that witnesses heard a shout of “Allahu Akbar” just before the firing started. Less clear is whether these words were spoken by Major Hasan. And if he did say them, was this a line from the scenario script of a drill?

MAJOR HASAN’S RANT TO MILITARY DOCTORS: “WE LOVE DEATH MORE THAN YOU LOVE LIFE”

The most elaborate attempts by Major Hasan to assert and establish a thoroughly Islamic profile for himself came in the form of a lecture at the Uniformed Service University of the Health Sciences in Bethesda , Maryland . He was supposed to present a paper on an issue of medical or clinical interest, but instead elected to make a ranting speech about the oppression of Moslems in the US military and the dangerous consequences this was sure to have. Here are some relevant parts of the account published by Dana Priest in the Washington Post: ‘The Army psychiatrist believed to have killed 13 people at Fort Hood warned a roomful of senior Army physicians a year and a half ago that to avoid “adverse events,” the military should allow Muslim soldiers to be released as conscientious objectors instead of fighting in wars against other Muslims. The title of Hasan’s PowerPoint presentation was “The Koranic World View As It Relates to Muslims in the U.S. Military.” Under a slide titled “Comments,” he wrote: “If Muslim groups can convince Muslims that they are fighting for God against injustices of the ‘infidels’; ie: enemies of Islam, then Muslims can become a potent adversary ie: suicide bombing, etc.” [sic] The last bullet point on that page reads simply: “We love death more then [sic] you love life!” Under the “Conclusions” page, Hasan wrote that “Fighting to establish an Islamic State to please God, even by force, is condoned by the Islam,” and that “Muslim Soldiers should not serve in any capacity that renders them at risk to hurting/killing believers unjustly — will vary!” The final page, labeled “Recommendation,” contained only one suggestion: “Department of Defense should allow Muslims [sic] Soldiers the option of being released as ‘Conscientious objectors’ to increase troop morale and decrease adverse events.”’[17]

Objections were made to Major Hasan’s tirade: “Students on a 2007-2008 master’s programme at a military college revealed … that they had complained to faculty about Major Hasan’s alleged anti-American views. They included him giving a presentation that justified suicide bombing and telling classmates that Islamic law trumped the US Constitution.”[18] But nothing serious happened. According to National Public Radio’s Joseph Shapiro, the worst thing that happened was that Hasan was given a period of probation early in his postgraduate work because of his insistence on seeking to convert to Islam some coworkers and the soldiers he was treating.

The title of this speech, “The Koranic World View As It Relates to Muslims in the U.S. Military,” sounds very academic and not very Islamic at all. It seems to imply that Islam and the Koran are just a world view or Weltanschauung among others. It falls far short of the basic Islamic fundamentalist claim to represent the authority of absolute revealed truth. We are reminded of Mohamed Atta’s will and instructions for his own funeral, which Islamic experts have found to be replete with elements and formulations utterly alien to Islam.

The categorical imperative for every mole is to protect the relevant patsies from investigation or arrest until the terror event has occurred and it is time to round the patsies up as scapegoats. The part about “We love death more then [sic] you love life!” is blatant ID format “Al Qaeda” speak, and in a military setting this speech would normally be more than enough to trigger a probing investigation into Major Hasan’s activities and belief structure. But no serious consequences ensued, suggesting that Major Hasan was an asset who was being protected for the sake of some future mission which he was being groomed and prepared to perform.

Thus, while Hasan’s medical superiors were aware of him as a problem case, they chose to do nothing: a “ group of doctors overseeing Nidal Malik Hasan’s medical training discussed concerns about his overly zealous religious views and strange behavior months before the Army major was accused of opening fire on soldiers and civilians at Fort Hood , Texas . Doctors and staff overseeing Hasan’s training viewed him at times as belligerent, defensive and argumentative in his frequent discussions of his Muslim faith, a military official familiar with several group discussions about Hasan said…. As a psychiatrist in training, Hasan was characterized in meetings as a mediocre student and lazy worker, a matter of concern among the doctors and staff at Walter Reed Army Medical Center and the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences military medical school, the official said.” (AP, 11 November 2009 )[19] At the same time, the training of a psychiatrist involves intensive psychological profiling an depth analysis by professors as an integral part of the training. As a shrink among shrinks, Major Hasan’s psychology must have been well known to the military doctors who were his professors. This opens up an avenue for manipulating and controlling him which has not been present in other terrorism cases. Did one or more of the Major Hasan’s analysts have a sideline as terrorist controllers and mind benders working for the rogue network?

:::notes:::

[10] Dow Jones Newswires 11-05-091656ET at

http://www.nasdaq.com/aspx/stock-market-news-story.aspx?storyid=200911051656dowjonesdjonline000934

[11] www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5ihGepAkECGoDagETVBMpPb3w7Y3gD9BPJO100

[12] Newsradio 620 WTMJ, November 5 at 2:01pm CST, at http://www.facebook.com/620wtmj accessed 13 November 2009.

[13] www.mirror.co.uk/news/top-stories/2009/11/06/brown-it-s-like-ww1-2-115875-21801278/

[14]http://www.wishtv.com/dpp/news/military/military_kxan_texas_shooting_on_ft._hood_2009110514301257453645749

[15] http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/6521758/Fort-Hood-shooting-Texas-army-killer-linked-to-September-11-terrorists.html

[16] http://www.newsmax.com/borchgrave/hasan_martyr/2009/11/09/283713.html

[17] Dana Priest, Washington Post, 10 November 2009 at http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/11/09/AR2009110903618.html. See the slide show, which is posted with this article.

[18] http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/6521758/Fort-Hood-shooting-Texas-army-killer-linked-to-September-11-terrorists.html

[19] http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091111/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/us_fort_hood_shooting

::::: TO BE CONTINUED IN TOMORROW’S EDITION ::::

By Webster G. Tarpley
14 November 2009

In the wake of the massacre at Fort Hood Texas , two principal theories have emerged to explain the conduct of the accused shooter, identified by the U.S. Army as Major Nidal Malik Hasan, an Army psychiatrist of Jordanian-Palestinian ancestry. One of these theories is embraced by left liberals and other supporters and acolytes of the Obama regime, and argues that Major Hasan is a sincere and devout Muslim who was the victim of a tragic contradiction between his religious faith and the logic of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, both the heritage of the odious Bush-Cheney regime. According to this version, Hasan must be viewed as a troubled and tormented individual who “snapped,” breaking down psychologically under the stress of his awful predicament. Here is how Obama summed up this approach: “Even within the extraordinary military that we have — and I think everybody understands how outstanding the young men and women in uniform are under the most severe stress — there are going to be instances in which an individual cracks.” (New York Times, 10 Nov and ember 2009) Calling Major Hasan a terrorist amounts, in this view, to racism and vindictive prejudice.

The other theory is the one advocated by assorted neocons, reactionaries, Islamophobes and others generally hostile to Obama. This account maintains that Major Hasan was a homegrown, self-starting Islamic terrorist, trumpeting his devotion to jihad and suicide bombing, seeking to make contact with “Al Qaeda,” and generally filled with hate for America , for freedom, and for his fellow soldiers. In this view, it is only the pervasive political correctness and multicultural obsession of the subversive-riddled and soft on terrorism Obama regime that prevented Major Hasan from being neutralized before he could act, and which prevents Obama and his Democratic allies from telling the truth after the fact.

These views are both superficial, naïve, and inadequate.[1] They amount to two prongs of an articulated campaign of media hysteria and mass manipulation designed on the one hand to prod the dithering Wall Street puppet Obama – who is having second thoughts about his own political survival — into an early decision in favor of massive escalation of the war in Afghanistan for the purpose of hastening the breakup of Pakistan, and thus threatening China. On the other hand, the delirium of Islamophobic hatred being ginned up against Major Hasan by the usual cast of reactionary radio ogres (Limbaugh, Beck, Hannity, Levin) seeks to accentuate and strengthen the racist and xenophobic elements in the militant anti-Obama opposition, in particular among the Tea Party movement. The decision to put the infamous Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and his confreres on trial in New York City, plus the recent government seizure of numerous US mosques and other buildings on the grounds that they are Iranian assets, also contribute to a growing mood of anti-Moslem hysteria. This atmosphere is accentuated by the reckless and irresponsible actions of some Moslem groups which happen to be foundation-funded, and must thus be considered as part of the apparatus of US domestic social control.

The media narrative which is now being consolidated a week after the shootings is full of contradictions, embarrassed silences, and absurdities. A third and distinct approach to this case is therefore required, one which regards Major Hasan as a manipulated patsy in the context of a relatively sophisticated operation mounted by forces within the US intelligence community, using methods and assets which by now ought to have become familiar. Major Hasan can be seen as a mixture of Lee Harvey Oswald, legendary 9/11 “suicide pilot” Mohammed Atta, and Cho Seung-Hui (the alleged April 2007 Virginia Tech shooter). He also has elements of reputed Robert Kennedy assassin Sirhan Sirhan, and of John Hinckley Jr., who was involved in an attempt to kill President Reagan – both of whom survived the operations in which they were implicated. He thus represents a new cocktail of patsy ingredients. Until now, Islamic terrorists had come in collectivist groups, and not alone. Major Hasan by contrast is a troubled loner in the tradition of Oswald, at the same time that he embodies the religious fanaticism of Atta, along with some of his peccadilloes. Major Hasan is that novelty, a troubled Islamic fundamentalist loner, even though this is something of a contradiction in terms. Like Cho, Major Hasan emerges from the psychiatric clinic, in his case as a practicing psychiatrist, but as a shrink with egregious symptoms of his own. Like all patsies, Major Hasan combines the flamboyant and bombastic proclamation of his personal creed with a seeming immunity from bureaucratic countermeasures which would normally be automatic in shutting him down. Hasan is revealed as a fanatic, a misfit, and a quasi-psychotic or psychotic mental case in his own right – who could not subsist without protectors in high places of the US intelligence community.

In my 2005 book 9/11 Synthetic Terrorism, I argued that 9/11 and other recent terrorist attacks represented provocations cynically orchestrated by privately controlled rogue networks operating within the US intelligence agencies for purposes of mass political manipulation. Starting from an overview of terrorist actions from the Gunpowder Plot of 1605 through 9/11, I developed a method of analysis of state-sponsored false flag terrorism which distinguished the roles of fanatical, duped, or psychotic patsies like Oswald, of subversive moles ensconced as officials within government agencies, and of technicians or professional killers who actually create the observed effects, all commanded and coordinated from outside of government, and all operating within the atmosphere of mass brainwashing provided by the Wall Street media. I also highlighted the role of drills and exercises which are hijacked and turned into real-world terror attacks. In order to understand the Fort Hood massacre, it is indispensable to apply this method here as well.

TROOPS THOUGHT IT WAS A DRILL – DID MAJOR HASAN THINK SO TOO?

In investigations like this, it is generally a great mistake to fixate on the scapegoat dished up by the mass media. The more we focus on the Oswald of the day, the less we understand of what actually happened. Let us turn away from the TV pundits, and listen instead to the eyewitness testimony of the troops who were present at the shootings. Many of them are on record agreeing that the events of November 5 were initially interpreted by those on the scene as an exercise, as a drill. Emphasis will be added to bring out this central fact.

From ABC News we get the following testimony: Solider Keara Bono ‘told “Good Morning America” today that she initially thought the scene of Hasan standing up, praising Allah and starting to fire was a drill. She didn’t believe it was real even when she felt her own blood, she said. “Then I looked to my left and right and I saw people that were bleeding,” she said. That’s when Bono realized that Hasan’s rampage wasn’t a drill.’ (ABC News GMA)[2]

In the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel of 9 November 2009 we find: “Pfc. Amber Bahr of Random Lake [ Wisconsin ] heard someone yelling and ducked at the sound of gunfire, but she said she thought supervisors at Fort Hood were holding a drill last Thursday. She didn’t know she was under live fire until she heard people screaming.”[3] This story was based on an interview given to NBC’s Today show.

CBS News reported: “Two days after narrowly escaping death at Fort Hood and just hours after his release from the hospital, Corporal Nathan Hewitt still can’t believe what happened was real. The survivor spoke to CBS News Correspondent Don Teague about those fateful minutes…. Even after being shot, Hewitt didn’t believe what was happening. He thought the gunfire was a training exercise and that he’d been hit by a rubber bullet. He says other victims thought the same thing.”[4]

ABC newsman Bob Woodruff found further corroboration of this general impression when he was allowed to interview shooting victims who were recovering in the hospital: “For many of the 43 people wounded when an Army psychiatrist allegedly went on a shooting rampage at Fort Hood, the scene was unreal — it seemed like something out of a movie. Maybe it was a drill. ….Capt. Dorrie Carskadon, a combat stress specialist from Wisconsin , who was at Fort Hood training for a deployment to Afghanistan , said she initially thought the shooting was a drill.”[5] Notice that this testimony comes from a field grade officer, a captain.

The Austin television station KXAN provides the following evidence: ‘Spc. Scott Hamrick and First Sergeant James McLeod made it out of the Soldier Readiness Processing Center alive after some maneuvering to get away from the suspect, Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan. “My initial thought is that it was a drill,” said Hamrick. “Because you know you’re always getting drilled for situations.” However, what Hamrick thought was a drill turned out to be something closer to war at home.’[6]

The Miami Herald furnished this account: ‘For Skip Blancett, the senior pastor at the First United Methodist Church of Killeen, news of the shooting left him anguishing for hours because his daughter, Hollye Davis, was at a building next door to where the gunman started firing. She and others were in lockdown for hours. Without a cellphone, she couldn’t call home. “They had no idea what was going on; everyone thought it was a drill at first,” Blancett said.’[7]

The idea that the shooting was part of a drill or exercise was so widespread that it had to be expressly countered in the first emergency announcement posted on the Fort Hood web site, which read: “Effective immediately. Fort Hood is closed. Organizations/units are instructed to execute a 100 per cent accountability of all personnel. This is not a drill. It is an emergency situation.”[8]

Based on this testimony, it seems clear that unannounced, surprise terror drills are standard operating procedure at Fort Hood and probably other military bases as well. They are frequent enough to be the first thing many soldiers, including at least one officer, thought was happening. Drills are designed to be as realistic as possible. But the acme of realism is reality – real killing, which can occur through small but decisive changes in the unfolding of the drill. We may therefore be dealing here with a drill which has been taken live or flipped live, as so often happens in terror incidents.[9]

This array of evidence allows us to pose the following question: If so many of the Army personnel on the scene thought at first that the incident was a drill, did Major Hasan also think he was attending a drill? Did he imagine that he was going to be an actor playing the assigned role of a member of the terrorist red team in a realistic exercise? In other words, was this inept, troubled and quasi-psychotic individual somehow under the impression that he was attending an officially sanctioned exercise of some routine type, until real bullets began to be fired by other more qualified shooters, thus taking the drill live? This might also help us to account for the extraordinary intensity of firing at the scene – well over 100 rounds. For this working hypothesis to stand up, we would have to show that there were other gunmen firing – gunmen who knew that the drill was turning into a real massacre. The additional shooters would according to the classification referred to above represent the technicians in this action – the trained killers who have the ability to do the things that the patsy is accused of doing. Interestingly enough, extra gunmen are exactly what we find.

**************************
Footnotes:

[1] Another concept asserts that the 13 Army personnel were killed during the suppression of a mutiny occasioned by the overstretch of US forces caused by Obama’s contination of the Iraq war and escalation of the Afghan war. Almost a week after the massacre, no direct substantiation for this idea has emerged.

[2] http://mobile.abcnews.go.com/wireless/abcnews/section/US/9018559_2

[3] http://www.jsonline.com/news/wisconsin/69626847.html

[4] Don Teague, “Hood Eyewitness Remembers the Tragedy: Corporal Nathan Hewitt Thought Gunfire was a Drill, Until He Realized He was Bleeding,” at http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/11/07/eveningnews/main5567562.shtml

[5] “Bob Woodruff Hears Soldiers’ Tales of Survival, Recovery,” http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/president-soldiers-families-flock-ft-hood-memorial/Story?id=9039151&page=1

[6]http://www.kxan.com/dpp/military/army/kxan_military_Hasan_family_contacts_attorney_11092009

[7] http://www.miamiherald.com/460/story/1321119.html

[8] http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/11/05/reports-of-mass-shooting-at-fort-hood/?src=twt&twt=nytimes

[9] My 9/11 Synthetic Terror provides a detailed discussion of how virtually every aspect of 9/11 corresponded to an exercise or drill which was then taken live.

More to come tomorrow…

WAKE-UP AND PAY ATTENTION!

STOP Worrying About Your SPECIAL Interest. It Won’t Matter a HILL OF BEANS If Obama Signs Away OUR SOVEREIGNTY at the ‘UNITED NATIONS CLIMATE CHANGE TREATY’ MEETING next month.

Signing away our sovereignty means we will NO LONGER be an independent Nation. Therefore, our Constitution and Bill Of Rights will be null and void. We will be lumped into the NEW WORLD ORDER and subject to their Laws under the Jurisdiction of the World Court served by the IMF under an elitist’s regime headed by Soros.

We have published a 12 part series detailing how the takeover of our society is being accomplished by the elitist’s agent, George Soros.

The final nail in our coffin will come next month, if we are too busy with other important issues to pay attention to a silent government takeover under the guise of Global Warming that will in the end, be irreversible, taking centuries to undue the damage done if it will even be possible. STOP IT NOW!

Watching these two videos will fill you in on all the details answering any questions you may have. Just bear in mind, Obama is a puppet president working for George Soros NOT in the Best Interests of fellow Americans…

*****************

Ask yourself, why is it the Obama White House can’t seem to get their Health Care Plan straight? The video below illustrates the ever changing goal posts stated by Obama himself. Confusion and Chaos to keep you occupied making you sick and tired of knowing what they are really up to that will take away your Freedom of Choice.

Listen to their response below (2nd video) making note of the speaker’s lips not matching her spoken words… Because even she has been edited by the vaunted transparent policies Obama proclaimed during his campaign as part of his “CHANGE” coming to Washington.

You know as well as I do, all Obama has done is BANK BAILOUTS and Corporate takeovers since he’s taken office. Providing NOTHING in the way of HELP for the American People ,saving Homes from foreclosure and creating jobs to keep those homes. All Obama represents is more of the same gloom and doom, hardship and austerity for years to come. If allowed to sign the Climate Treaty this will be our permanent way of life.

Posted in general politics, George Soros, Global Economy, Global News, Globalization, New World Order, Obama, United States Tagged: George Soros, New World Order, Obama ]]> http://pumasunleashed.wordpress.com/2009/11/20/do-not-read-this-if-you-expect-living-in-a-free-society/feed/ 0 Tellurian http://pumasunleashed.wordpress.com/2009/11/18/obamas-godfather-epilogue-current-assessment/ http://pumasunleashed.wordpress.com/2009/11/18/obamas-godfather-epilogue-current-assessment/#comments Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:50:16 +0000 Tellurian http://pumasunleashed.wordpress.com/?p=3716 ]]>

Editor’s Note:

The purpose of this epilogue is to take account of where we are today and where we are heading in the near future. I realize this is a lot of information to wrap your mind around. The opposition will label it a conspiracy theory and many people will reject it on that basis. I understand the sentiment. I do not want to believe it is true either. However, there comes a point where the evidence is so overwhelming that it can no longer be ignored, dismissed or rationalized. As more people come to an informed understanding about Soros public opinion will turn against Mr. Obama. Soros is moving to preempt that reaction in the public square and to control the voting process. So far he has been remarkably effective. No public official has stood up to him (except for Rep Joe Wilson’s outburst… “LIAR”). But in any grand scheme there is always an X factor—something the architect did not anticipate something he cannot control. At this point I cannot tell you what that might be. It is an imponderable. But, our goal is clear: to drag this dark mover from behind the scenes into the broad light of day as I have tried to do for you here. For now at least, this is our country. Let us make sure we do not lose it.

EPILOGUE: CURRENT ASSESSMENT

A year has passed since Obama was elected. His poll numbers have fallen from the stratospheric heights they were at then. His approval rating is now below 50% according to the most reliable polls. This is unprecedented. Pundits and pollsters alike are setting off warning flares. And they have found just the right nostrum: Mr. Obama must adopt a more conservative fiscal policy or else his party will suffer dire consequences in the 2010 election. That is the sober advice which pollster Scott Rasmussen and political advisor Doug Schoen offer Obama. Newsweek writer Scott Trende makes essentially the same argument when he says the Jacksonians and the suburban voters are deserting Obama because they know they will pay dearly for Obama’s fiscal irresponsibility. (Note: Scott also boasts that he and Jay Cost invented the term “Jacksonian” to describe the working class coalition that believes in traditional American values. Unless I am mistaken, that term was coined by the estimable Walter Russell Meade.) To complete the folly, Republicans are reading the tea leaves the exact same way. Suffice it to say, a good strategist could run circles around these plodding conventional thinkers.

Soros is a strategist of the first order. He knew when he installed Obama that there would come a time when the hopium would wear off and in the morning after the American People would awaken to the inescapable fact that they are being robbed. Furthermore, he knew that when that happened a substantial anti-Obama coalition would form, and if that coalition could hang together then his man would be defeated in 2012. He will soon be 80 and might not live to see his plan for a New World Order come to fruition. Therefore, he needed an answer.

The answer to his problem is as old as the Roman Empire: If the opposing army is superior in numbers then you create a crisis in its ranks, so you can divide and conquer. Obama does not need a majority to win in 2012. All he needs is to get more votes than the other candidate. And for Soros that is the trump card.

The Soros strategy is in four (4) parts. The first part is to push for so-called Immigration Reform. This will be done in the name of national security, fighting terrorism, interdicting drug cartels and enhancing cross border economic activity. Those are perfectly legitimate issues. Time will tell whether they are effectively addressed or get lost in the shuffle. In an administration where everything is political, and attempts to govern through the endless campaign, it is hardly surprising that the real objective of this legislation is political in nature: to game the 2012 election. Amnesty will be the cutting edge issue. More than 12 million people are in this country today illegally. The prospect of legalizing them while 17.5% of the American labor force is out of work is irresponsible. That issue will ignite controversy. The word racist will be redeployed. It will galvanize Hispanic activists, and antagonize unemployed Americans. It will drive a wedge into the body politic including the anti-Obama coalition. It will reinforce the Soros position of open borders set forth in his Open Society mantra. It is brilliant.

Second, Soros can see the fissures within the Republican Party. Perhaps a better word would be schisms. Perhaps an ever better word would be great divide. Today, the Republican Party is a coalition of small government libertarians, religious conservatives and neo-con business interests. They agree on certain issues, disagree on others and if the candidate the party puts forward does not appeal to them they will either vote for a third party candidate as they did with Ross Perot in 1992, or else they will stay home as they did in 2008. We saw that as well in the 23d Congressional District of New York. As a result, the Democratic candidate won in 1992, and the Dimocratic candidate won in 2008. And in each case, those uncompromising Republican voters told themselves that in the moment of truth they stood for principle. A better interpretation would be that they formed a circular firing squad and blasted away—just like Soros wanted.

Soros knows this and that is why he is starting to fund politicians and groups within the Republican coalition who press positions which divide the Party and/or the electorate. For example, Soros will be inclined to fund a “Republican in Name Only” (RINO) like Florida Governor Christ in his Senate run because he knows that conservatives will not vote for him for ideological reasons and if they show any inclination to do so then can tell them about the Night of the Green Iguana. Similarly, he is making a large contribution the Catholic Church knowing that they will support candidates who oppose abortion. Meanwhile, his man Obama courts anti-gay spiritual leaders. Again, this is a concerted attempt to pull voters away from the Republican Family Values Coalition. He knows can proceed with impunity in the Democratic Party. Organizations like NARL, Planned Parenthood, and others endorsed Mr. Obama in the primary and refuse to criticize him when he makes common cause with their enemies. You begin to wonder whether they are taking member contributions under false pretenses. Soros knows.

Third, Soros is a practitioner of shock doctrine. He knows that whenever there is a crisis the majority of people will rally around the nominal leader, and forget everything else. That is why his man Obama tells us that everything is a crisis, the status quo is unsustainable, and another spending program must be initiated or else we will all be wailing and gnashing our teeth in the outer darkness. It is also why he has moved aggressively to take over the economy. And, it may even explain why Mr. Obama has decided to prosecute the mastermind of 9/11 in U.S. District Court as a civilian with the full protection of the U.S. Constitution, rather than a military tribunal as enemy combatant under the Uniform Code of Military Justice. This serves the interests of both Soros and Obama because it will keep the issue of interrogation techniques in the forefront of the nation and world. It will energize the radical left wing base of the Democratic Party in preparation for 2010 and it will ingratiate Obama to the Muslim world but at the expense of America. And, it will greatly enhance the likelihood that the defendants will be acquitted because of what occurred in custodial interrogation. In that case, mainstream media wins as well because they can then seize the opportunity to blame this on all Bush. Obama would express disappointment at the misdeeds of his predecessor and exhort all of us to be better human beings. It could also lead to a bonus round for Soros if the Bush officials who authorized the extreme interrogation techniques which prevented a second al Qaeda attack on U.S. Soil are charged with violation of domestic or international law. In that case there could be a follow up trial and a Second Judgment at Nuremberg. Soros has a pathological hatred for Bush and this would delight him to no end. If the Republicans have any heavy hitters left like Ted Olsen then now would be a good time to start rolling them out. This is a bold and provocative move by Soros. It is a chance he did not have to take and it could backfire on him.

Fourth, Soros funds an organization called the Secretary of State Project. The purpose of that project is to elect Democratic Candidates to Secretary of State position in key battleground states. The Secretary of State is responsible for the interpretation and application of State Election Laws. The Democrats blamed Gore’s loss in 2000 to Florida Secretary of State Katherine Harris (the recount) and Kerry’s loss in 2004 to Ohio Secretary of State Kenneth Blackwell (the rejection of provisional ballots) both of whom were Republicans and made rulings adverse to the Democratic Candidates. The Secretary of State Project has been successful. In 2006 the candidates it supported won 5 such elections and in 2008 4 more. However, instead of correcting the problem some of those Democratic Secretaries of State have made it even worse. The paradigmatic example is Jennifer Bruner in Ohio whose attempts as voter disenfranchisement border on malfeasance.

(Note: there may well be a fifth part to the Soros strategy to maintain perpetual power—voting machines. It is like the Secretary of State problem inasmuch as Democrats believe the abuse of these machines began with the Republican Party who controlled the voting machine company—Election Systems Software. The Democrats want to change to a new voting machine company—Segovia AVC Advantage, which has been purchased by a Venezuelan Company which is linked to the government of Hugo Chavez. However, the more critical point is this: whichever voting machines are used they can be hacked and votes can be stolen by writing a computer program which had not been invented at the time that the machine was designed. This has been proven by computer experts at leading universities. This could turn out to be another project for Soros supported Blue State Digital. The answer to this entire dilemma is hand counted paper ballots with a secure chain of custody. That is the only way to ensure clean elections and restore public confidence.)

Someone asked me why Obama seems so ebullient when the problems of our country are so dire. I told him that if I am right and he is controlled by Soros then it is because he has made significant progress implementing the Soros Agenda. If he were focused on the people’s agenda then the priorities he is pursuing would be entirely different, e.g. jobs and fiscal control. Someone else asked me whether he is soft on terror. I told him if you add everything up then it is hard to reach any other conclusion. Specifically: i) his failure to deal with Afghanistan, ii) his failure to support the democracy movement in Iran, iii) his failure to insist that Iran relinquish its nuclear weapons program, iv) his failure protect our borders, v) his support for amnesty, vi) his refusal to call a jihadist army officer who slaughters 13 Americans a terrorist, vii) his failure to prosecute terrorist suspects before military tribunals and viii) his support for the prosecution of Americans whose interrogation techniques reportedly prevented a second 9/11 attack on American soil—taken together as a pattern all point to the same conclusion.

Good God! Enough!! Be off with you Irving Berlin!! You must learn to respect the opinions of other people. And, try the benign explanation first! Isn’t it true that Soros could fund the Catholic Church for perfectly legitimate reasons such as a detached and disinterested generosity? Isn’t it possible that Soros heard the flute music of the Gospel of Wealth? How can you be so sure his motive is Machiavellian? How can you criticize this wonderful altruistic man? Oh, but that is not the worst of it. No siree! Why you even have the audacity to criticize the Messiah himself! How dare you accuse My Barack Obama of base motives? He has given so much HOPE to everyone in the world—especially unemployed Americans, and our soldiers in Afghanistan. Just you wait Henry Higgins! By the end of his fourth term everything will be perfect!!! Right now, he is showing the world that he open minded enough to give the men who did bad things on 9/11 the presumption of innocence and the full protection of our laws. And just last week he told us not to jump to conclusions about the army soldier who lost his mind and unintentionally shot 13 Americans at Fort Hood. If these poor men had been raised in nurturing environments none of this would have happened.

He always knows the perfect thing to say–like dumb (white) cop. The three little things people in small towns cling to. A more tolerant man never lived. A more decent one never existed. (Swoon). He is always thinking of me– I mean us, and never about himself. And he is there when you need him– on bus placards, street cameras, art posters, magazine covers, mugs, key chains, sweat shirts, bloomers, body tattoos and everywhere else you look—just grinnin’ like a possum. Oh, blessed are we that Messiah Obama came to Earth in our lifetime. (Tearing up). How can he produce a birth certificate when he is the product of Immaculate Conception? Those birthers never thought about that possibility– now did they? How can you criticize him after all he has done for mankind? (Choke). Well, okay maybe he hasn’t done squat. But just remember he got the Nobel Prize in the I Got Plenty of Nuthin’ category– so there! (Tongue Protrudes). How can you say mean things about his avuncular Godfather? (Fortissimo) I hate you! You are delusional! (Sobbing convulsively, music rises from the orchestra pit, camera moves in, long close-up, fade to black, print.) Voice over: no retakes please!

Thank you for the Selznick moment. You ask me why I say these things? I say them because they are true. Our world is in flux and the American People are entitled to know what is going on. Mainstream media gives them nothing but bread and circuses. When is the last time you heard Brian Williams ask Obama a tough question? People need to know what is true. And they do not want to hear from Snidely Whiplash Axelrod.

You ask me how I know that what I am saying is true? After all others there are other opinions. The reason I know is because I have been on the campaign trail, I have spoken to knowledgeable people and I have done the research. Could I be wrong? Of course, I have no illusions about that. I could be wrong on a number of points—but the premise itself is sound. There is too much supporting evidence to conclude otherwise.

How do I know that these irreproachable men have an ulterior political motive which is not in the interests of the American People? I know because I know the nature of the beast, the devil’s coup d’ etat, and the brave new world of George Soros. Furthermore, I believe what’s past is prologue. You do not need to be a clairvoyant. You don’t need inside information. All you need to do is understand their motivations, interpret their words and watch their actions—like a hawk. Then do your own research. To know more about the grand scheme, you would need to be inside the Soros organization. If you are, then you have my sympathies. If you are an American or just a decent human being, and not addled on hopium then there will be times when your conscience troubles you deeply, and you wonder if the paycheck is really worth it. But there are many lawful ways to defend our country especially where you are. We are relying on you as well.

PLEASE LET US KNOW IF THIS MINI-SERIES HAS HAD AN IMPACT ON YOUR THINKING…

AS FOX MULDER IS WANT TO SAY: “THE TRUTH IS OUT THERE”… and we brought it to you here!

Author: Bill Boe 11/03/2009

THE GHOST OF PAUL REVERE

First they called us racists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a racist;

Then they called us a mob, and I did not speak out—because I was not a mobster;

Then they threatened a news network, and I did not speak out—because I was not a journalist;

Then they destroyed our country, and I did not speak out—because I wanted to believe their lies;

Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak out for me. . . . .

Editor’s Note:

This chapter concludes our discussion of The Godfather of Obama—George Soros. If you are still skeptical then perhaps it would be worthwhile to review some of these materials. If you doubt that Soros represents global banking interests, is the world’s largest currency trader and has crashed major markets to the detriment of many people then I suggest you re read Chapter 2. If you question whether Soros has overthrown governments who resisted his globalist agenda and has used his charitable network to do that, take another look at Chapters 3 and 5. If you have a hard time believing that Soros has privatized the Democratic Party, controls it and put Obama in the White House, then please review Chapter 6. If you reject the idea that Obama is marching in lock step with the Soros Agenda then take another look at Chapters 8 and 10. If you think it is farfetched that Soros is working to tank the United States, bolster China and create a New World Order then please review Chapters 4 and 10. And in each case, read the accompanying links.

If you do not like the word conspiracy then call it a business plan because that is what it really is. If someone tells you that it is impossible for one mortal man to do all this then ask them to consider what one brilliant but evil man can do with think tanks, political connections, and unlimited money behind him in a time of transition and dislocation. Hitler proved this could be done. That is not to say that Soros is Hitler because they are different in terms of means and ends. Nevertheless, Hitler aspired to rule the world and so does Soros. Hitler wanted to do so out front whereas Soros is perfectly happy to do so from behind the scenes through a front man named Obama. But whatever you do, please do not fall for the old lie that this is a right wing attempt to discredit a liberal philanthropist or is somehow anti-Semitic. That is a suckers bet. If you agree that there is substantial evidence that what I am saying is true, then the question becomes what if anything can the American People do about it. This chapter will address that question.

CHAPTER 12: THE GHOST OF PAUL REVERE

Many years ago, a movie critic told a Hollywood Director that art must imitate life. Therefore, a villain of the silver screen must stop telling the hero all the dreadful things he is doing with impunity, to make the hero feel powerless. In the real world villains do not operate that way. The Director took a long drag on his cigarette (historical note: they smoked in those days), looked the critic in the eye, and told him you are wrong. That is exactly how it works in the real world. Evil must advertise. After all, what is the point of being evil if no one notices, and no one cares? Thus, when Soros tells us I made a billion as the pound crashed, or I had a nice crisis thank you, or the former Soviet Empire is now the Soros Empire he is simply telling us who and what he is. Fine. Now we know.

George Soros is a man of malignant ambition. He has vast wealth and powerful connections. He uses those assets to destroy markets, overthrow governments and thereby harm innocent people. His intention is “to puncture the bubble of American supremacy” in order to create a New World Order which he and his cronies will design and control. Now finally he has his man in the White House. Therefore, he can advance a globalist agenda—which for us equates to taxation without representation. What can the average citizen do to preserve our rights?

On April 18, 1775 Paul Revere faced the same question, except that threat emanated from King George of England rather than Emperor Gyorgy of the Soros Empire. His answer was to ride from Boston to Lexington by moonlight to warn other patriots of the impending threat. We must do that much and more.

First, we must recognize what the goal is here. The elites have been trying to move us to a New World Order ever since the fall of collapse of the Soviet Union. There are two contending factions at work. The main areas of disagreement relate to what that New World Order will look like and how we will get there. The Neo-cons wish to preserve sovereignty, side with Israel, and favor military action. The Neo-libs (like Soros) want world government, do not support Israel and favor bloodless revolutions. Second, Soros is the master and Obama is the puppet. He will do what Soros instruct him to do. Third, we must watch what Obama does around the world because that is where the foundations of the New World Order are being laid. Lord Monckton has warned us about this “transmogrification” of America. That is the perfect word to describe what Obama is seeking to do by treaty. It means to change the form grotesquely.

The bottom line is we must fight back. If you see the same patterns I do and know of someone who would stand with us in this fight then feel free to pass this paper along to them. If you know of someone who wants to fight back but is not in a position to do so overtly for whatever reason then you may wish to remind them that there a many lawful ways to deal with an oppressive situation that do not require direct confrontation. The bottom line is we must do what Paul Revere did and get the word out.

Paul Revere December 22, 1734 – May 10, 1818 was an American silversmith and a patriot in the American Revolution.

EPILOGUE

Author: Bill Boe 11/03/2009

THE GHOST OF PAUL REVERE

First they called us racists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a racist;

Then they called us a mob, and I did not speak out—because I was not a mobster;

Then they threatened a news network, and I did not speak out—because I was not a journalist;

Then they destroyed our country, and I did not speak out—because I wanted to believe their lies;

Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak out for me. . . . .

Posted in general politics, George Soros, Global Economy, Global News, New World Order, United States Tagged: George Soros, New World Order, Obama, puppet ]]>

Editor’s Note:

This chapter discusses what the New Rome would like. We can turn to history and political science for partial answers. But those answers are destined to be imperfect, because other factors come into play. Two of them seem are salient to me. One is the fact that in this New Rome a unitary view of the world would emerge. The paradigmatic expression of this comes from Cicero: “there will not be different laws at Rome and at Athens, or different laws now and in the future, but one eternal and unchangeable law will be valid for all nations and all times, and there will be one master and one ruler, that is God, over all of us, its promulgator and its enforcer”. The problem with this unitary view of government is that it begets absolute power and thus leads to tyranny as de Montesquieu opined. The other concern is that the relentless march of technology will change human beings in ways that are not entirely predictable. Those of us who did not grow up with the computer look at those who did with a sense of awe and the certain knowledge that they are different from us in ways that have nothing to do with age. Some readers may live to see the New Rome, others will not and 100 years from now fate will know which group was the lucky one.

CHAPTER 11: A NEW ROME

According to Hobbs, our ancestors found life in the state of nature “nasty, brutish and short”. So they formed Civilization for their mutual aid and comfort. But this entailed a corresponding loss of freedom. When that loss became intolerable they moved on or they revolted. The Exodus is one example of this. The Barons at Runnymede gave us the Magna Carta, Western Europeans gave us the Enlightenment and the Founding Fathers of this country gave us the Constitution and Bill of Rights which protect our freedom within certain tolerances. When those rights are violated and a court of competent jurisdiction provides an effective remedy, the fabric of society is maintained. Those rights were bequeathed not only to us, but to all nations who wish to adopt them.

That is the great edifice which megalomaniacs like Soros aim to tear down. They begin by assuming a unitary view of the world, and arrogate to themselves vast powers to reconstruct it as they see fit. When you have such powers at your disposal the temptation to use them for your own gratification can be irresistible. You become like a maniacal child. The human beings whose lives you are playing with become insignificant, as you become desensitized to their fate. Your perspective is like that of a bombardier flying over enemy territory dropping bombs on people you will never meet this side of the grave. It is no use to have a picture of Rita Hayworth on the bomb. Your quarry will be just as dead when you are through.

Whether the megalomaniacal Soros, the absurd Chairman Mo or the messianic Obama realize it or not, the New World Order will end in Rome not Athens. It will be a dictatorship as opposed to a democracy. The experience of the last century provides good and sufficient notice of what will occur when a Messianic leader with a cult following takes over the collective mind of a credulous population through mass movement politics, propaganda and scapegoats . . . human nature being what it is. In essence, these fools are dabbling in political black magic and sooner or later the entire proposition comes down to this:

“The Party seeks power for its own sake. We are not interested in the good of others; we are interested solely in power. Not wealth or luxury or long life or happiness: only power, pure power. We are different from the oligarchies of the past. They pretended and even believed they had seized power unwillingly or for a limited time, and just around the corner there lay a paradise where human beings would be free and equal. We are not like that. We know that no one ever seized power with the intention of relinquishing it. Power is not a means; it is an end. One does not establish a dictatorship to safeguard a revolution; one makes the revolution in order to establish a dictatorship. The object of persecution is persecution. The object of torture is torture. The object of power is power.” (Note: those words were written by George Orwell in the classic book 1984. However, they could just have easily come from the mouth of Rahm Emanuel)

In this New Rome, the American People would be disenfranchised- again- as they were the 2008 Democratic Primary. And the words of the Poet Juvenal in the 1st Century AD would ring true: “Already long ago, from when we sold our vote to no man, the people have abdicated their duties; for the People who once upon a time handed out high civic office, military command, Roman legions-everything, now restrains itself and hopes for just two things: bread and circuses.”

The New World Order would preserve the fiction of the nation state for a period of time, but as the forces of global consolidation accelerated the nation state would be superseded, except for those matters which were local and had no global impact. The argument for global consolidation would be we must now do X in order to save the planet, to rectify global imbalances of one kind or another, and/or to promote global harmony. We would become Citizens of the World and a new set of legal rights and responsibilities would attach. Most likely, our existing rights would diminish and our obligations would increase. International courts would assert jurisdiction over matters now considered to be national in scope. The Constitutional structure we have in the United States would not be the model because it limits government and gives the individual power to challenge its edicts. The UN Charter and the tenets of International Law would not work either because they are predicated on the continuity of the sovereign state which would lapse over the course of time. The Bill of Rights would become a dead letter with respect to free speech, the right to bear arms, the right to sovereignty, the right to fully participate in the process. Political power would be vested in what Learned Hand called “a Bevy of Platonic Guardians”.

The countervailing argument in favor of the unitary view was given to us by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes in 1913. It suggests among other things genetic engineering and population control. Mr. Justice Holmes, Civil War veteran, Captain in the Massachusetts Regiment Union Army, left for dead on the defeated battlefield of Antietam, Chief Justice of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, appointed the Supreme Court of the United States by President Theodore Roosevelt is widely regarded as the best legal mind this country has produced, and-dare I say it- better than even. . . Sotomayor. Yes, I know, that is hard to believe. In any event, here is what Holmes told us a hundred years ago:

“If I am right, it will be a slow process for our people to reach rational views, assuming that we are allowed to work peacefully toward that end. But as I grow older I grow calm. If I feel what are perhaps an old man’s apprehensions, that competition from new races will cut deeper than working men’s disputes and will test whether we can hang together and fight; if I fear that we are running through the world’s resources at a pace we cannot keep, I do not lose my hopes. I do not pin my dreams for the future to either my country or even my race. I think it probable that civilization will last as long as I care to look ahead—perhaps in smaller numbers but perhaps also bred to greatness and splendor by science. I think it not improbable that man, like the grub that prepares a chamber for the winged thing it has never seen but is to be—that man may have cosmic destinies that he does not understand. And so beyond the vision of battling races and an impoverished earth I catch the dreaming glimpse of peace.”

CHAPTER 12: THE GHOST OF PAUL REVERE

EPILOGUE…

Author: Bill Boe 11/03/2009

THE GHOST OF PAUL REVERE

First they called us racists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a racist;

Then they called us a mob, and I did not speak out—because I was not a mobster;

Then they threatened a news network, and I did not speak out—because I was not a journalist;

Then they destroyed our country, and I did not speak out—because I wanted to believe their lies;

Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak out for me. . . . .

Editor’s Note:
This chapter discusses the extent to which the Obama Administration is spying on Americans. Prior administrations did this for security reasons. There is evidence that the current administration is doing it for political reasons as well. If that is true, then the words of Orwell in the classic book 1984 are prophetic: “There was of course no way of knowing whether you were being watched at any given moment. How often, or on what system, the Thought Police plugged in on any individual wire was guesswork. It was even conceivable that they watched everybody all the time. You had to live—and did live, from habit that became instinct—in the assumption that every sound you made was overheard, and, except in darkness, every movement scrutinized.”—.

CHAPTER 10: SPYING ON AMERICANS

Soros knows that information is power. Therefore he invested in a data mining company early in the game. In 2004, four operatives in the Dean Presidential Campaign founded a company called Blue States Digital to conduct online fundraising, communicating and organizing of support for political candidates and causes. In 2006 Soros became a client. Blue States worked closely with the Obama campaign. They sent out campaign emails to supporters with instructions to forward that email to five (5) like-minded people, and secretly monitored and recorded the email addresses to which the email was sent. In other words, the Obama campaign spied on its own supporters. See: “How sneakily are Blue State Digital Tracking NGO political e-mails? The LINK is a little wonky and may not work for you more than once or not at all.. So…

“The firm behind President Barack Obama’s online election campaign have been signed up to help anti-racists take on the British National party in the European parliament elections in June.
Blue State Digital (BSD), which used the latest internet technology to mobilise millions of people behind Obama, has been employed to help create a grassroots network across the UK as part of the campaign to stop the BNP leader, Nick Griffin, becoming the far-right party’s first MEP.”

“The firm began work last week and has already signed up thousands of supporters and donors. As part of the first stage of its campaign BSD and an anti-fascist magazine, Searchlight, has sent thousands of emails asking each recipients to forward it to five friends and make a small donation.The software means campaigners can then track who opens the emails, where they are sent and what happens when they arrive at the other end – tailoring future emails to groups and individuals”
[...]

In the aftermath of 9/11 the Bush Administration began monitoring all email, fax and telephone, conversations throughout the world in real time with the NASA Supercomputer. The initial purpose of the monitoring was to detect key words which would indicate a present intention to commit a terrorist act. Later it was modified to monitor the emotional state. This amounted to a warrantless search. So the Patriot Act was changed to permit the monitoring but the evidence was inadmissible as fruits of the poisonous tree. The Administration was reluctant to acknowledge the existence of such activities and unwilling to proceed to court on cases where they would be exposed in pre-trial discovery. There is reason to believe that Blue States wrote a program to mine that information as well.

During the primary Obama deplored the illegal spying on Americans, but when he got to the general election he switched gears. Mainstream media excused this as simply moving to the center. But the logical inference is that he wanted to continue spying on Americans for security reasons and political ones as well. This is evident in reversal on FISA, his refusal to prosecute 40% of the cases, and his ability to tailor messages in real time. For example, when the national chatter decried his Stimulus Plan as a slush fund he quickly renamed it a “Safety Net”. Likewise, when he was called weak and indecisive on Afghanistan, the New York Times headline was immediately changed to read “Obama Convening War Council and Entering Decision Making Phase. For a general discussion of the subject the following article can be found at Wapo: “Government Turning to Data Mining”

The relationship between Soros and Blue Digital is a continuing one. As noted above, Soros is bullish on Brazil and is heavily invested in its economy. He is also trying to insinuate himself into its political system. Thus, it is hardly surprising that Blue States Digital would be down there now working for the labor candidate in that election. Do not be surprised if Soros is paying for this. Do not be surprised if they show up as players in the next Soros Revolution.

forthcoming:

CHAPTER 11: A NEW ROME

CHAPTER 12: THE GHOST OF PAUL REVERE

Author: Bill Boe 11/03/2009

THE GHOST OF PAUL REVERE

First they called us racists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a racist;

Then they called us a mob, and I did not speak out—because I was not a mobster;

Then they threatened a news network, and I did not speak out—because I was not a journalist;

Then they destroyed our country, and I did not speak out—because I wanted to believe their lies;

Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak out for me. . . . .

Editor’s Note:

This chapter looks at Mr. Obama through the lens of history, and shows that he is a business oriented politician—to put it charitably. To put it bluntly, he is a politician who will sell his constituents down the river to suit the interests of Big Business. Thus, it is hardly surprising that he is pushing the Soros Agenda full throttle, and burying our nation in debt. But it is not so ginger peachy when you he traipses around the world telling bureaucrats who want our sovereignty and nations that want our wealth—Yes We Can! We love him-with a love that is more than a love. But there comes a point where we have to look him in the eye and say darlin’ we love you but we can’t afford you. Or, if that is not good enough, we can say Barack we can have you or we can have a middle class—but not both.

CHAPTER 9: A POLITICIAN WHO STAYS BOUGHT

President Roosevelt had his Four Wise Men, one of whom was George Kennan. He died a few years ago at the age of 101, his obituary took up a full page of the New York Times, and they barely scratched the surface. He was a man of letters, as ill suited for the television age as many silent screen stars were for the age of sound in Hollywood. But in his time and place he was a force to be reckoned with. One of the many things he said that resonated with me was this: I would like to give those in power a sense of what I see when I look at current events through the lens of history so that our leaders do not drag us down those paths which lead only to despair and from which no one ever returns.

If you look at the history of Mr. Obama as politician, the red flags were obvious. The Chicago machine has a long history of corruption, Obama had a stable meretricious relationship with a political fixer named Tony Rezko who is now a VIP guest of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, and Barack went soft on Excelon when they spilled trace amounts of nuclear waste into drinking water. In each case, the interests of constituents were implicated and in each case he sided with Big Business. My godfather was active in politics after World War II. He used to say an honest politician is one who stays bought.

Mr. Obama is owned by Soros. Since taking office, he has pursued the Soros Agenda robotically. Soros wanted a stimulus plan and Obama got one early. He told us it would keep unemployment under 8% whereas today it is over 10%. (Note: by the broader measure, it is 17.5% according to the New York Times 11/07/09.)

As Boston Globe writer Jonathan Goldberg recently observed: while the country has been screaming for Washington to concentrate on fixing the economy and the unemployment rate, Obama and his party have rigidly focused on their health care schemes and cap and trade—which even if they work will do nothing to fix the joblessness in the near future. Consider the evidence: Soros wanted the Cap and Trade bill so he could corner the market in carbon credits. Obama pushed for that policy as well. Soros wanted Government Health Care and Obama pursued it. Former Congressional Budget Office Director and economist Dr. June O’Neill notes that we are in a debt crisis, the health care bill supported by Obama and Soros will add $400 billion per year to our $12 trillion debt, it will adversely affect seniors and job creation, and the Administration is hiding the true costs through accounting gimmicks.

Meanwhile, Soros cronies Pelosi and Reid are subverting the legislative process by preventing elected representatives from reading sweeping legislative proposals before voting on them, threatening their careers if they vote against them, and abusing the reconciliation process.

Senator Nelson of Nebraska has behaved like a responsible legislator and told Reid that he needs time to read the bill before he votes on any motion because he needs to know what he is voting on. Hallelujah! Fox News.

And now we learn from a British Lord that Obama will be off to Copenhagen in December to sign a treaty pledging huge sums of taxpayer money to compensate poor nations for “environmental damage”. This extravagant policy is favored by Soros as well. To run up a deficit of this magnitude during the worst economic debacle since the Great Depression while our currency is under attack by China, Russia, Iran, India, Pakistan and Brazil is not in the interests of America. But, it is part and parcel of the Soros Agenda.

In the near term Obama will pursue other aspects of the Soros Agenda with equal verve. Soros favors open immigration because borders are a source of national identity, friction and inhibit the free movement of people and goods. He blurs the line between citizen and non citizens for the same reason. He hates nationalism and sees himself as a “Citizen of the World”, above any nation—and for that matter, so does Obama. Thus, it is hardly surprising that Obama will press for Immigration Reform with Amnesty, while his cronies push to include those illegal aliens in the upcoming Census to give him more seats in Congress.

In Egypt, Obama delivered a speech that drove mainstream media into a state of euphoria. He thundered the words of his groping 28 year old speech writer from the lectern below to the heavens above as only he can. Their hearts fluttered, they hyperventilated and they pronounced him A Greater Than Reagan. But in the heat of passion they missed the dog whistle. Watch: “The walls between old allies on either side of the Atlantic cannot stand! The walls between the countries with the most and those with the least cannot stand!! The walls between races and tribes; natives and immigrants; Christian and Muslim and Jew cannot stand!!! These now are the walls we must tear down!!!!!!!!!!!!” Trust me, their Messiah was not channeling Reagan. He was parroting the fundamental tenets of the Open Society Institute of Soros. What Soros Wanted Obama Delivers

Finally, our beloved media has yet to grasp the exquisite irony of a man who asks us to trust him and then spends $1.7 million in legal fees to hide his birth certificate; a man who blames a white cop for something he did not do and then warns the rest of us not to jump to conclusions over the Fort Hood tragedy; and a man who labors under the dangerous misapprehension that governing is simply campaigning by a different means-to paraphrase Clausewitz. With respect to China, a red dawn is rising. Our Secretary of Commerce is Chinese-American and will do an excellent job. He is not a Soros puppet. I understand that we are actively soliciting massive Chinese investment in this country. It is the classic buy-sell transaction in which each party has what the other one wants, i.e. we have land and they have money. They have no more land in China, and we have abandoned our manufacturing base. But there is a sinister aspect to this. Obama is rumored to have an unsigned Executive Order on his desk which will permit massive immigration from Red China. If that rumor is true, then we need only reflect upon the experience of our neighbor to the north to understand the inherent risks of that particular course of action. Those risks include a breach of national security and an exposure to organized crime. The Royal Canadian Mounted Police issued a “secret” report on that subject in 1997 which has been scrubbed. In sum, it is no coincidence that that the lights of the Empire State Building burned red to celebrate the 1949 Chinese communist Revolution. From Soros perspective this would complete the process of global economic integration which began with MFN in 2000. Also, it would give his hedge fund and the banking interests he represents greater access to the Chinese economy, which grew at 8.9% notwithstanding the global slowdown.

forthcoming:

CHAPTER 10: SPYING ON AMERICANS

CHAPTER 11: A NEW ROME

CHAPTER 12: THE GHOST OF PAUL REVERE

Author: Bill Boe 11/03/2009

THE GHOST OF PAUL REVERE

First they called us racists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a racist;

Then they called us a mob, and I did not speak out—because I was not a mobster;

Then they threatened a news network, and I did not speak out—because I was not a journalist;

Then they destroyed our country, and I did not speak out—because I wanted to believe their lies;

Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak out for me. . . . .

Editor’s Note:

This chapter discusses the New World Order of George Soros and the enabling steps which his man Obama is taking to impose upon us. In the glorious NWO of Soros, the United States will lose its dominant role. The new epicenter will be various international institutions created in response to pending global problems. The economic engine of the NWO will be another country. Mr. Obama is moving aggressively toward this NWO and is taking four initial steps to transition us to this NWO. Soros told CNBC he is pleased.

CHAPTER 8: THE BRAVE NEW WORLD OF GEORGE SOROS

When most Americans hear a politician talk about a New World Order, or in the vernacular NWO, they innocently assume that it means that America will retain its predominance and nations like China and India will become partners with us based on their growing economic stature. They further assume that these nations will help us address the multitude of problems facing the world from terrorism, to economic stability, to environmental affairs. These are rational assumptions given the fact that the United States has the greatest military in the world and the largest economy, four times that of its nearest competitor.

But that is not the kind of New World Order Soros envisions. He believes the New World Order will be based on three (3) realities which he is laboring to bring about: i) first, the United States will cease to be the leader of the world, ii) second, international regulatory bodies will assume absolute control over international problems without regard to sovereignty, and iii) China will replace the United States as the economic engine of the world economy. In addition, there is a social dimension to his scheme which will tend to reflect the Fabian socialist schemes of the Open Society Institute and the world of George Orwell.

The first step in the transition was to empanel the army of Czars. We now have 35 of them and they preside over every aspect of the economy. They do not report to the Cabinet, they do not report to Congress, they report only to Obama who is Soros man. Why are they there? If you look at their job titles you get a sense that they are not like the one or two Czars in past Administrations. If you examine their personal background you realize that some of them are members of the radical left and have ties to Soros—and many of them do not. And, if you put them in the context of the globalist agenda Soros favors and Obama is pursuing then you can easily infer that some of them at least are there to facilitate transition to the New World Order. For example, we have a Regulatory Czar named Cass Sunstein who will seek to harmonize our regulations with a growing body of international financial regulations. You have a Climate Czar named Carol Browner who will try to move us into the Kyoto Treaty and more international environmental regulations. Until recently you had a Green Jobs Czar named Jones who made Reverend Wright look like a wall flower and now works for a Soros organization. And, most intriguing of all there is a Behavioral Czar, who has not yet been appointed. This suggests the possibility that the theories of B.F. Skinner set forth in his book Beyond Freedom and Dignity may play some part in our future. Not every czar has a transitional role but some do. List of Czars

The second step in the transition was to transfer our sovereignty over the regulation of financial matters having an impact on the global economy to a committee of 23 international bankers where we have only one vote. This was done at the G-20 meeting in London last February. Mainstream media gushed global cooperation, reveled in celebrity and missed the critical details. It is not clear that Mr. Obama realized what he did, but when he embraced the global plan for recovery and reform he endorsed International Monetary Fund (IMF) surveillance of the U.S. economy, creation of a global “Financial Stability Board,” the expanded use of a new global currency called Special Drawing Rights, a new global warming treaty . . . in addition to a trillion dollar commitment of taxpayer money to IMF and the World Bank. Soros called G-20 a success, but the effect on the American middle class was highly problematic. (See:”Obama Endorses Soros’ Plan to Loot America)

As Henry Ford said the aim of international bankers is to control the world by creating “inextinguishable debt”. Clearly, Obama is marching to their drum.

The third step in the transition will occur in December when Mr. Obama marches to Copenhagen to sign the Kyoto Treaty. The author of this treaty is Canadian Oil Billionaire Maurice Strong, aka Chairman Mo. He is a close friend of Soros, is a business partner with him on the new automobile being produced in China, and a member of the Chicago Climate Exchange Board. He is also a UN bureaucrat who gave us this pearl of post industrial wisdom in 1992 which is reflected in his treaty. (Note: alas, old bureaucrats do not die or fade away).

“Economic growth is not the cure—it is the disease. . . . Industrialized countries have developed and benefited from the unsustainable patterns of production and consumption which have produced our present dilemma. It is clear that current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class involving high meat intake, consumption of large amounts of frozen and convenience foods, use of fossil fuels, appliances, home and work-place air-conditioning, and suburban housing—are not sustainable. A shift is necessary toward lifestyles less geared to environmentally damaging consumption patterns.” (See Link).

In an interview with Bill Moyers, Soros tied Chairman Mo’s mission to save the planet from fiery death to the future world economy as follows: “You see, for the last 25 years the world economy, the motor of the world economy that has been driving it was consumption by the American consumer who has been spending more than he has been saving, all right? Than he’s been producing. So that motor is now switched off. It’s finished. It’s run out of — can’t continue. You need a new motor. And we have a big problem. Global warming. It requires big– investment. And that could be the motor of the world economy in the years to come.”

According to the U.S. Energy Information Agency, ratifying Kyoto could cost the American economy $400 billion dollars per year, raise electrical utility rates by 86%, hike the cost of heating oil by 76% and impose a permanent “Kyoto gasoline tax” of 66 cents per gallon. In total each U.S. household would have to spend $1,740 per year on energy. WEFA, an economist information and consulting firm, reports that 2.4 million jobs would be lost and manufacturing wages would be cut by 2.1%.

The fourth step in the transition is to convince China to step up to the plate and become the new economic engine for the world. Recently, he told the Financial Times that China should replace the United States as The Leader of the New World Order. He claims China is not pulling its weight in reorganizing the global economy after last year’s economic collapse, and the way to convince China is to allow it to “own” the reorganization of the global financial system that is underway. In addition, he says that the United States should surrender the dollar and accept the inevitability of a global currency (See: Soros: “China Should Lead the New World Order”) The truth is we do not need George Soros to unfurl the white flag for us. And the same goes for Chairman Mo. Those gentlemen do not speak for the American People.

Fortunately, Mr. Obama does not have carte blanche—not yet anyway. He still needs 2/3 Senate ratification and his Party has only 60% of the seats. He will try to seduce RINOS like Snow and Collins to vote for Kyoto. If he cannot convince them to betray the country he may have to settle for passing it as a domestic law as opposed to an international treaty, in which case it would not be irrevocable.

forthcoming:

CHAPTER 9: A POLITICIAN WHO STAYS BOUGHT…

CHAPTER 10: SPYING ON AMERICANS

CHAPTER 11: A NEW ROME

CHAPTER 12: THE GHOST OF PAUL REVERE

Author: Bill Boe 11/03/2009

THE GHOST OF PAUL REVERE

First they called us racists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a racist;

Then they called us a mob, and I did not speak out—because I was not a mobster;

Then they threatened a news network, and I did not speak out—because I was not a journalist;

Then they destroyed our country, and I did not speak out—because I wanted to believe their lies;

Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak out for me. . . . .

Editor’s note:
This chapter discusses how mainstream media has fallen from grace in the eyes of the American People in a single election cycle. We watched them deify an African American candidate with no experience, destroy a woman with a lifetime of public service and twist the truth to their own hyper-partisan ends. We wrote thousands of letters to them protesting this injustice but they fell on deaf ears. We saw them disparage citizens who disagreed with them as ignorant, racist, mobster. They were unable to disguise their contempt and elitism. Not surprisingly they are losing their audience but their delusion is such that they pretend not to notice. Meanwhile, their marketplace has been reduced to a few players due to technological change, media consolidation and entry barriers. Soros exploited all this brilliantly through direct investment in parent companies, funding left wing media watchdog organizations and providing perks to talking heads.

CHAPTER 7: A BREACH OF TRUST

An acquaintance of mine is the former publisher of a periodical which was widely regarded as the best small town newspaper in America; his father was president of the Newspaper Publishers Association; and a colleague of Washington Post publisher Ben Bradley. He is a Republican so he was not emotionally invested in the outcome of the Democratic Primary, the way others were. Nevertheless he saw the same thing the rest of us did, namely a concerted effort by mainstream media to hijack a presidential election. That was unprecedented. Later studies by the Pew Institute confirmed what all of us saw, namely that mainstream media coverage was grossly unbalanced in favor of Obama. Moreover, Professor Jamieson of the Annenberg School of Journalism among others confirmed the obvious namely that sexist attacks were launched by mainstream media against Hillary and later Sarah. Mainstream media became a Ministry of Propaganda.

Specifically, mainstream media (with the sole exception of FOX) promoted Obama to the American People as a demigod in waiting, categorically refused to vet him (who can forget the anguished look on Anderson Cooper’s face when CNN was forced to cover the Reverend Wright goddamn America arias), and echoed the message of the Obama campaign in South Carolina that it was racism to criticize him. At the same time, they tried to destroy Hillary Clinton both as a candidate and as a person because she stood in the way of their Messiah. They stamped a negative brand on her candidacy in the beginning, applied a double standard in air time and content of coverage and did their level best to terminate her campaign. From Matthews, to Maddow, to Dowd, to Shuster, to Olberman, to Rich, to Herbert, to Goodwin, to Huffington, to Milbank, to Cilezza, etc. the words of Orwell came to life: “a hideous ecstasy of fear and vindictiveness, a desire to kill, to torture, to smash faces in with a sledge hammer, seemed to flow through the whole group of people like an electric current, turning one even against one’s will into a grimacing, screaming lunatic”. The herd regained its ancient evil primacy.

The question I discussed with the newspaper publisher was not whether mainstream media had sold out. That answer to that question was beyond cavil. Rather, we focused on the more intriguing question of why mainstream media sold out. We concluded that it boiled down to three things:

First, there is the problem of corporate ownership. If you read Jack Welch’s book “Winning”, you get an informed sense of what has happened to mainstream media in the last twenty years. Welch was CEO of General Electric—a manufacturing conglomerate. He bought NBC which had a long and distinguished history in the news business dating back to General Sarnoff. Welch may be many things, but a traditionalist he is not. On the contrary, he was determined to impose the standards of a widget factory on a newsroom. Not surprisingly, there was a revolt in the newsroom and a battle ensued. One of the issues at stake was the integrity and independence of their news programming. Suffice it to say the good guys lost, and the new philosophy took hold. Shortly thereafter we had the Dateline episode where NBC rigged a GM truck to explode and claimed that it was unsafe. They were sued and they paid because GM had the goods on them.

The other broadcast networks were also bought up by conglomerates. CNN is owned by AOL Time Warner, ABC is owned by Disney, and CBS is owned by Westinghouse. Each of those parent companies has global economic interests to protect and to pursue. It is inevitable that those interests would seep into their news coverage of an election. At that point, the question is not which candidate is best for the country, but which one is best for the business interests of our parent company. This became obvious in the latter part of the campaign when the current CEO of General Electric who wants to pursue nuclear power killed a negative story on Obama by an NBC affiliate. I had lunch with a man awhile back who has significant economic interests which are global in scope, and no other reason in the world to say nice things about this particular Administration. Nevertheless he told me how great they were to work with. It was obvious that he had some kind of a deal with them, and if that was the true, then there can be little doubt that the conglomerates which own news organizations do as well.

Second, they sold out for the sake of power. For better or for worse, the two prior administrations held mainstream media at arm’s-length. What the media saw in Obama was likeability, the promise of access and influence, and the rare opportunity to be part of the governing coalition. Now that is heady stuff. They were tempted the same way Faust was tempted to sell out and they succumbed. In one sense, they got what they asked for. The White House sends them an average of 12 emails per day, watches their coverage like a hawk and lets them know whenever it is displeased. Access is granted or withheld accordingly. Thus, mainstream media went from being rebuffed by prior administrations to being micromanaged by this one. Many of journalists are lazy and do not mind. But those who are any good chafe at it. They know that a liberal democracy needs honest journalists—not propagandists. FOX is the only network that has not been neutered. Sometimes they are excessive. But at least they have the guts to stand up to power. That is why the Administration is determined to defrock them.

Third, they sold out for personal reasons. Many journalists are insecure people. That is understandable and forgivable up to a point. After all, in their world, the first priority is to satisfy their editor, the second priority is to please their peers, the third priority is to titillate their audience, and the last priority is to tell the truth– and by that I mean the whole truth. Are they all that way? No. Thank God, there are a few like Charles Krauthammer who have not sold out. They practice journalism the old fashioned way—with brains, skepticism and hard work. But that is not what you see at NBC, MSNBC, CNN, NYT, Politico, Time, Newsweek and AP. Those organizations practice a new-fangled journalism where facts are slippery, practices are shoddy, and the herd mentality prevails. The polls reveal the truth which is that they are losing their audience. Peter Kahn of the Wall Street Journal warned us this would happen in his 1992 message to readers. When you see a cover of Time Magazine which says this about Obama: “Yes he can, but hasn’t yet”, you wonder why they choose to perpetuate the myth. In a courtroom it would draw an objection: assumes facts not in evidence.

What does all this have to do with Soros? The answer is simple. The recent concentration of media power in few hands gives Soros undue influence over the public mind which he would not otherwise have. He owns a major interest in AOL Time-Warner which perpetuates the themes of the campaign like the one cited above. It continues to promote Obama and attack Hillary. In addition, Soros owns an interest in 257 newspapers in 113 countries. (See: Soros Media Empire)

And of course some of the scions of mainstream media like Tom Brokaw and Bill Moyers sit on the boards of Soros organizations but neglect to mention it.

In sum, I shall not scruple to say that mainstream media has committed a breach of trust. The impact upon the public mind is subtle but apparent. As we look back on the primary, it becomes obvious that whether you like her or not Hillary Clinton offered solutions to our nation’s problems, whereas Obama had no real solutions- but oh so much hope. Many well meaning people responded to that emotion, and felt a sense of personal triumph when he took the Oath of Office. They never investigated his background, never studied what he did in Illinois, and never dreamed that there was an uber-capitalist behind him pulling his strings. Mainstream media suppressed much of that information, and encouraged those people to settle for bread and circuses. Today those people defend him because they love him. He is their sun, their moon, their east, their west and nothing else matters–least of all reality. Others, who believed in him, and trusted him to keep his campaign promises, look at him now and wonder what became of the man they voted for. And then there are those who did not vote for him—the ones Politico’s Chuck Todd would call “racists” solely for that reason. Many of those people—black and white alike have been bludgeoned into silence by the race card. Mainstream media is no longer protector of the community. On the contrary, they exploit the fault lines for profit. And now they have created a new McCarthy Era where people are afraid to speak the truth and contribute to the marketplace of ideas. That serves the interests of no one more than Soros.

forthcoming:

CHAPTER 8: THE BRAVE NEW WORLD OF GEORGE SOROS

CHAPTER 9: A POLITICIAN WHO STAYS BOUGHT

CHAPTER 10: SPYING ON AMERICANS

CHAPTER 11: THE BRAVE NEW ROME

CHAPTER 12: THE GHOST OF PAUL REVERE

Author: Bill Boe 11/03/2009

THE GHOST OF PAUL REVERE

First they called us racists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a racist;

Then they called us a mob, and I did not speak out—because I was not a mobster;

Then they threatened a news network, and I did not speak out—because I was not a journalist;

Then they destroyed our country, and I did not speak out—because I wanted to believe their lies;

Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak out for me. . . . .

Editor’s Note:

The first five chapters are intended to give the reader an informed sense of who Soros is, what he has done, and by implication what he is capable of. The writer knows he has the burden of proof that this is not some wacko conspiracy theory. He gladly assumes that burden. This chapter shows how Soros came to control the Democratic Party, and get Obama elected. It also identifies some of those who were complicit, primarily mainstream media. Subsequent chapters will discuss where the writer believes we will go from here in the short term, the long term and what we can do as Americans to prevent the destruction of our country which Soros is engineering.

CHAPTER 6: THE DEVIL’S COUP D’ ETAT

Step 1: Corrupt the Campaign Law: The McCain-Feingold Act was passed in 2002. The intent of that law was to limit the power of big money in elections. To that end, it prohibited soft money donations the political parties. Soros and others spent $140 million to create an exception to that rule which put big money in an even stronger position than it was in before. The exception allowed big money donors to pour unlimited amounts of money into political process through 527 issue advocacy groups and thereby influence the outcome of elections. Under Section 527 of the Internal Revenue Code, a political organization can get tax exempt status and spend unlimited money if it champions causes rather than specific candidates. Thus, the 527 organization could not promote a pro-Obama theme. However, it could buy television time to demonize his opponent.

Soros used Move-on.Org for precisely that purpose. That 527 group launched withering attacks against Bush for the Iraq War. Furthermore, when General Petraeus proposed the surge they labeled him “General-Betray-Us”. But when Obama continued the surge and other Bush policies they had previously opposed with rancor their voices fell strangely silent. That is hardly surprising. They are the “Soros Gestapo”, Obama is a Soros man, and therefore they will never attack him– regardless of what he does. (See: Will Soros Money Undermine Election Results?)

Step 2: Create the Shadow Party: in 2003, Soros inter alia created a nation-wide network of think tanks, activist groups and unions which are part of the radical left wing base of the Democratic Party. Conservative thinker and former anti-war radical David Horowitz (Radical Son) called this network “The Shadow Party”. This network of organizations masqueraded as mainstream Democrats, when in fact they were not. As Soros himself conceded: “the Democratic Party does not stand for the principles that I advocate; if it did it could not be elected.”

Step 3: Line Up Billionaires: in the summer of 2002 Soros summoned a team of political strategists, activists and Democrat donors to his Southampton beach house in Long Island. At the meeting, Soros laid out his plan to take over the White House. A liberal activist group Americans Coming Together (ACT) proposed to mobilize voters in 17 battleground states. Soros told them he would give ACT $10 million. Before coffee the next morning, his friend Peter Lewis, chairman of the Progressive Corp., had pledged $10 million to ACT. Rob Glaser, CEO of Real Networks, promised $2 million. Rob McKay, President of the McKay Family Foundation, gave $1 million. Soros also promised $3 million to The Center for American Progress. (WashPo 11/13/03)

In 2005, Soros set up a network of left wing think tanks and advocacy groups called the Democracy Alliance. Then, he prevailed upon eighty wealthy leftists to pledge one $1 million or more over a five year period, and 1000 more leftists to contribute $250,000. The principal beneficiaries were Media Matters (a left wing propaganda machine to counter the conservative media), the Center for American Progress headed up by John Podesta, and America Votes. (See: Spawn of Soros)

Step 4: Take Over the Democratic Party: When the Democratic Party lost the ability to rely on soft money it panicked. Soros provided them with a solution which calls to mind the old saying beware of Greeks (or Hungarians) bearing gifts. The metaphor of the Trojan Horse is apt, for he invited the big money donors to contribute to his network of organizations in lieu of the Democratic Party itself. As a result, he siphoned off $300 million from the Party, and privatized the Party.(See: The Shadow Party) As Don Iverson observed “Soros is the most powerful man in the Democratic Party today because he is able to make large donations to whichever candidate or candidates support his views. The enormous sum that he is able to give makes the future Democratic nominee very beholden to him”. That is how he controls Obama.

Step 5: Plan the Velvet Revolution: in 2004, Soros cronies developed a secret campaign strategy called The Dean Plan based on the Velvet Revolution Model. The stated objectives of the Dean Plan can be summarized as follows: 1) create a base of support outside the traditional Democratic Party and focus on that 10% of the electorate who are influential within their peer group or on the web, 2) create a web of small donors to offset the major donors of the Democratic Party, and supplement them through 527 PACs with unlimited contributions, 3) create a cult movement which appeals to young people and diverse populations, 4) drive home the theme of change with arguments and symbols, 5) bring left wing media commentators on board, 6) create an echo chamber in mainstream media, talk radio and the web, 7) select a candidate with no national name recognition, charisma and the stamina for a national campaign and nominate that candidate eight months prior to the general election. (see: The Dean Plan)

Step 6: Select the Charismatic Candidate: In 2002 Howard Dean identified a candidate who met those criteria. Dean placed him on a list called “The Dean Dozen”. He was a Harvard Law School graduate, a no show Editor of the Harvard Law Review, a scion of the powerful Chicago political machine, and a state senator from Illinois. He was former community organizer for ACORN. His name was Obama. He was young and had a hypnotic timbre to his voice. He believed he could “make people believe anything he wants them to believe”. He was unknown to the national audience, and the paper trail on him from birth certificate to transcripts was hidden from public view. Consequently, the Dream Factory was free to define him to the county as they saw fit–in two best selling “autobiographies”. The wild card was his race. They did not know whether a predominantly white electorate would vote for a black candidate. So they tested the proposition by running an Obama clone in Massachusetts, and Axelrod managed the campaign. When Deval Patrick won the governorship, the question was answered in the affirmative. That is why Obama plagiarized Patrick speeches—they were afraid to deviate from the script one iota. (Note: the birth certificate controversy is a self-inflicted wound for Mr. Obama. The real question is why he would spend $2 million dollars in legal fees to avoid producing a legal record which everyone else produces as a matter of course in response to a reasonable request. He asks us to trust him– but trust is a two-way street).

Step 7: Become Obama’s Godfather: Soros backed Dean in 2004. When Dean’s candidacy ended in the memorable Dean Scream, he withdrew from the race, and turned his army of bloggers over to Obama. Then, he introduced Obama to Soros, who made a $60,000 contribution to Obama’s Illinois Senate Campaign. During the next two years, Soros met with Obama on several occasions. Soros presented Obama to his cabal of money men from major domestic and foreign banking firms. In one instance, he and Obama staged a mock debate over AIRPAC wherein Obama took the side of Israel and Soros took the contrarian side to impress wealthy Jewish donors that Obama was on their side. In January 2008, Soros crony Wolf from the Swiss Bank UBC helped Obama plan his campaign. Ultimately, what Soros saw in Obama was a candidate who fit the Dean Plan, could inspire a world-wide movement and was the quintessence of what every big businessman hopes for in a public servant, namely a politician who takes orders and stays bought.

Step 8: Rig the Primary: In the Early States Soros funded organizations like ACORN hired street thugs and many were trained at Camp Obama on how to subvert the democratic process. The inevitable result was pervasive voter fraud and intimidation. In my own travels, I saw orderly caucuses and disorderly ones. Two thousand (2000) complaints were filed against the Obama campaign. (See: Caucus Analysis) Many of those complaints were serious. (See: Texas caucus fraud ) However, they were ignored by the Democratic National Committee, which was presided over by three Soros confederates Dean, Pelosi and Brazile. In South Carolina, the Obama campaign played the race card from the bottom of the deck. They called Bill and Hillary racists while Obama himself maintained plausible deniability—like he always does. The Clintons have been very loyal to the black community throughout their careers. Hence the slanderous charge that they were racists was the unkindest cut of all. Brutus Clyburn was one of the plotters. Their skullduggery is well documented in the article Race Man by Professor Sean Wiltentz . That false charge of racism reverberated though the rest of the campaign and undermined black support for Hillary. It was pure evil.

In the Middle States a revealing thing occurred. Obama met privately with Governor Rendell of Pennsylvania, who was a Hillary supporter. Obama warned Rendell to go easy on him because he would be the nominee. Rendell was puzzled by the comment because it was the middle of the primary and the two candidates were running neck and neck. What Obama was telling him was that Soros and other insiders had already made the decision that Obama would be the nominee regardless of what the voters did. Shortly thereafter, politicians tied to Soros like Dodd, Leahy and Kennedy called on Hillary to withdraw from the race because it was hurting the party. Nevertheless, she was determined to press on until every state had its chance to vote. Meanwhile, Soros appeared on television, praised Obama to high heaven and damned Hillary with faint praise.

In the Late States where Soros- influenced media shills attacked Hillary at every opportunity. Soros is heavily invested in AOL-Time Warner, which is the parent organization of CNN. At the beginning of the campaign CNN hired marketing strategists to attach negative words to Hillary like polarizing and had their talking heads repeat them night after night so they were implanted in the minds of voters. Meanwhile, MSNBC pundits Matthews, Shuster and Olberman launched crude sexist attacks against Hillary, causing the New York Chapter of NOW to picket their employer. Even ABC Golden Boy Tapper succumbed to the feeding frenzy and compared Hillary to Tonia Harding. Michael Goodwin accused her of wanting Obama assassinated because she innocently mentioned the death of Robert Kennedy in a newspaper interview. This was part of a coordinated media strategy to end her campaign. What are we to make of these people? Perhaps the answer lies in something Frank Herbert wrote, namely that contrary to popular myth, power does not corrupt; power attracts corrupt people; and eventually they lose their audience as their bias becomes open, and notorious.

At the conclusion of the campaign, the Soros controlled Rules and By-Laws Committee met to decide how the votes cast by Florida and Michigan would be allocated. Obama was not on the ballot in Michigan and yet the Committee awarded him delegates that Hillary won. This was a blatant violation of the core party principle of “fair reflection”. The rules were trashed to ensure Obama got the nomination. Thereafter, the Soros controlled DNC threatened to cut off funds to the state delegations that supported Hillary. Also, threats were issued to Hillary’s super delegates that the party would field candidates to run against them in their primaries if they did not switch to Obama. They forced them to sign pledges to support Obama. Pelosi told them to support Obama not because of any demonstrable capacity for leadership, but because he brought in so much money. Again, the influence of Soros was pervasive.

At the Convention, the fine young cannibals who were there to support Obama tried to bribe Hillary delegates to change their votes and if they would not change they harassed them. A complaint was drafted to the Secretary of State of California protesting this. But in the end, Hillary conceded. The Party that Soros controlled disrespected Hillary and her 18 million supporters. She won more primary votes than any Democratic candidate in history, including Obama. But real democracy does not count when you are dealing with Soros.

As you can see, the nomination process was a sham. Soros controlled the Party and he made sure that Obama got the nomination.

forthcoming:

CHAPTER 7: A BREACH OF TRUST

CHAPTER 8: THE BRAVE NEW WORLD OF GEORGE SOROS

CHAPTER 9: A POLITICIAN WHO STAYS BOUGHT

CHAPTER 10: SPYING ON AMERICANS

CHAPTER 11: THE BRAVE NEW ROME

CHAPTER 12: THE GHOST OF PAUL REVERE

Author: Bill Boe 11/03/2009

THE GHOST OF PAUL REVERE

First they called us racists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a racist;

Then they called us a mob, and I did not speak out—because I was not a mobster;

Then they threatened a news network, and I did not speak out—because I was not a journalist;

Then they destroyed our country, and I did not speak out—because I wanted to believe their lies;

Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak out for me. . . . .

Editor’s Note:

This chapter pierces the veil of the of the Soros charitable network and reveals its subversive nature. The particular organizations that comprise the Soros network are listed in the link below. These types of organizations were used to bring the government of President Shevardnadze because he would not play ball with Soros. In fact, Shevardnadze accused Soros of this and Soros as much admitted it. The methods were elucidated in the prior chapter. These actions in Georgia and other parts of Eastern Europe allowed Soros to boast to a journalist that the old Soviet Empire is now the Soros Empire.

CHAPTER 5: OH WHAT TANGLED WEBS WE WEAVE . . .

“Oh what tangled webs we weave–when first we practice to deceive”. . . In 1979, Soros established an organization called The Open Society Institute. The stated purpose of that organization is: “to build vibrant and tolerant democracies whose governments are accountable to their citizens. . . to shape public policies that assure greater fairness in political, legal and economic systems and safeguard fundamental rights . . . to implement a range of initiatives to advance justice, education, public health and independent media . . . to build alliances across borders and continents on issues such as corruption and freedom of information . . . to improve the lives of people in marginalized communities . . . etc.”(See: OSI Mission Statement)

Fine and well. But how can a man who tells us that he has no regrets about confiscating the personal effects of fellow Jews bound for Nazi death camps; no qualms about decimating the life savings of working class people through predatory currency speculation in Britain; and no reluctance to use shock therapy in Eastern Europe, claim to have a serious intent to “promote justice, fight corruption and improve the lives of people in marginalized communities”, and then put $5 billion dollars where his mouth is? The sentiment is admirable but the underlying motivation is suspect in view of his prior actions. Why then does he engage in charitable activities on a scale such as this?

(See: Contrarian View)

Why then does he do it?

The Gilded Age offers one possible answer. Andrew Carnegie made a fortune in the steel business along the Monongahela River and then wrote an essay called “The Gospel of Wealth”. The central premise was the wealthy entrepreneur must dispense his fortune in a socially beneficial way, and not allow it to be wasted on frivolous expenditure. (Wikipedia) To that end, Carnegie gave money to libraries and other socially worthwhile causes. However, there is no evidence that Carnegie ever sought to destroy the United States so he could construct a New World Order. Obviously, Soros is not Carnegie. In fact, he is the opposite.

To comprehend the true motive of a man like Soros, we must analyze the nature of the organizations he is funding. Then we must think about how they fit in an overall plan of creative destruction. The first subset consists of entities which have a charitable purpose. Soros builds global good will through them. The second subset consists of entities which have a distinctly political purpose. They include radical left wing think tanks, law firms, academic groups, internet companies, media outlets, media watchdogs, bloggers and community activists. (Note: The most comprehensive list of The Organizations Funded by Soros)

The operative question, then, is why does Soros fund these groups? Because he uses these organizations to subvert governments that will not play ball with his globalist agenda and replace them with ones that will. As Neil Clark put it, Soros used the Open Society Institute to weaken the existing political structures and pave the way for Eastern Europe’s eventual colonization by global capital.”

The Velvet Revolution in Georgia is the paradigmatic example. In 2003 Soros targeted Georgian President Eduard Shevardnadze for overthrow. Soros’ aim was the destruction of Russia as a world power. Eliminating Russian influence and replacing it with new regimes hostile to Russia was his goal. Soros had originally sought to control Shevardnadze, having met him in the 1980s when Saakashvili was Soviet foreign minister. Even then Soros was setting up his Open Society Institute in Georgia. In 2002 Shevardnadze made complaints against what he deemed Soros’ subversive activities. Soros responded that Shevardnadze could not be trusted to hold fair elections, and that he would mobilize his street lackeys, adding: “This is what we did in Slovakia at the time of Meciar, in Croatia at the time of Tudjman and in Yugoslavia at the time of Milosevic.”

The Soros’ Open Society Institute sent a 31-year-old Tbilisi activist named Giga Bokeria to Serbia to meet with members of the Otpor (Resistance) movement and learn how they used street demonstrations to topple dictator Slobodan Milosevic. Then, in the summer, Mr. Soros’s foundation paid for a return trip to Georgia by Otpor activists, who ran three-day courses teaching more than 1,000 students how to stage a peaceful revolution.” (Note: like Camp Obama perhaps?) Soros gave the anti-Shevardnadze movement a considerable nudge: He also funded a popular opposition television station that was crucial in mobilizing support for this week’s “velvet revolution,” and he reportedly gave financial support to a youth group that led the street protests.” The street protest eventually forced Shevardnadze to sign his resignation papers.

(Note: In the eyes of Mr. Soros’s employees, it was all done in the name of building democracy.The useful idiots of the Left had done the work of a globalist money speculator, marching under self-proclaimed ‘high ideals’, again fulfilling Oswald Spengler’s political dictum that ‘there is not a left-wing movement, not even the communists, who do not operate in the interests dictated by Money).

(See: Russo-Georgian Conflict Originates With Soros Subversion )

forthcoming:

CHAPTER 6: THE DEVIL’S COUP D’ETAT. . .

CHAPTER 7: A BREACH OF TRUST

CHAPTER 8: THE BRAVE NEW WORLD OF GEORGE SOROS

CHAPTER 9: A POLITICIAN WHO STAYS BOUGHT

CHAPTER 10: SPYING ON AMERICANS

CHAPTER 11: BRAVE NEW ROME

CHAPTER 12: THE GHOST OF PAUL REVERE

Author: Bill Boe 11/03/2009

THE GHOST OF PAUL REVERE

First they called us racists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a racist;

Then they called us a mob, and I did not speak out—because I was not a mobster;

Then they threatened a news network, and I did not speak out—because I was not a journalist;

Then they destroyed our country, and I did not speak out—because I wanted to believe their lies;

Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak out for me. . . . .

Editor’s Note:

The parable of the scorpion and the frog: the scorpion asked the frog for a ride across the pond. The frog refused because the scorpion might sting him. The scorpion assured the frog that he would never do that because they would both drown. Finally, the frog relented and let the scorpion ride across the pond on his back. Half way across, the scorpion stung the frog. As they both sunk to the bottom, the frog asked the scorpion “Why did you kill me?” The scorpion replied “Because it is in my nature”.

CHAPTER 4: THE SCORPION AND THE FROG

“Creative Destruction” is an economic theory which posits that companies who revolutionized and dominated industries lose their dominance over time as new players enter the market and introduce better products, more efficient methods and/or lower costs. (Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy: Schumpeter). The same can be said of nations. For example, the United States emerged from World War II as the production and consumption engine of the world. During the 1980s we lost our manufacturing sector to free trade policies and off-shoring to low cost countries. Eventually, that work migrated to China. Today, we are losing our consumption preeminence as well. The domestic consumption market in China is growing at over 20% per year. In our own hemisphere, Brazil and Venezuela are emerging as major sources of raw materials, production, and consumption.

Soros is mindful of this tectonic shift in the world economy. He wants to work his way into the new markets while maintaining a presence in the old ones. Since his specialty is hedging he has positioned himself on both sides of the transaction. On the one hand, he is betting on the rise of China, Brazil and Venezuela. His objective is to become a political and economic player in those countries. On the other hand he is betting on the decline of the United States. And now that he has his man in the White House, he is in a position to push policies which will expedite the process of creative destruction. His immediate goal is to make money. His ultimate goal is to establish a New World Order as discussed below.

Soros is supporting the economies of China, Brazil and Venezuela. His investment strategy tells the story: as of June 30, 2007, Soros manages $2.6 billion portfolio as of June 30, 2009. The breakdown by sector is: i) oil and gas: 49.3%, ii) consumer goods: 10.5%, iii) building materials: 10.4%, iv) financials: 6%, v) technology: 5.6%, vi) health care: 5.6% vii) utilities: 3.7%, vii) telecom: 1.9%, viii) consumer goods. The major stock holdings include four Brazilian oil companies (Baslierio, Petreloio, Petrolibrazil and S.A. Petrobras), TPX (domestic oil production), Extreme Networks (internet switching and load balancing), Preradata (intelligence gathering, warehousing and analyzing in 40 countries), Microsoft (software), Francetelecon (4^th largest telecom in world), Teekay Tankers (oil transportation), Time-Warner (media: CNN, AOL, Time Magazine), Focus Media (largest advertising network in China). In the case of Brazil, Obama has given him a two billion dollar loan for his oil exploration activities, and Blue States Digital is working for one of the political candidates in that election. Finally, Soros owns an interest in 257 newspapers in 113 countries. ( See: Soros Finances Media Empire)

Soros is undermining the economy of the United States in various ways. For example, he is betting against the dollar, recommending that it be replaced as the world reserve currency, and preaching a gloomy future for our economy. At the same time, he is pushing Obama to pursue policies which are suicidal to the nation, in a time of economic distress. The net effect has been to triple the deficit. This has caused China to stop buying U.S. Treasury Bills, and the dollar to lose 17% of its value since Obama took office.

Moreover, Soros advocates policies which will destroy our identity and vitality as a nation. For example, you cannot have open immigration on the one hand and safety nets on the other without bankrupting the country—yet Soros proposes both. You cannot have a sovereign nation, and fund an organization like La Raza which advocates a break-up of the United States—yet Soros does this. But if your goal is to eliminate borders, erase a national identity and create a North American Union then those positions are not inconsistent. Likewise, if you want a strong economy then you must produce goods and services. But if you force entire industries off shore by funding radical environmentalism as Soros does and must therefore import what you need, then you will become dependent on other nations for your survival and you will have massive unemployment. It is no mystery why Soros does this. First, last and always he is a global capitalist committed to a policy of creative destruction. (See: The Perverse Soros Agenda )

“Shortly after Soros invested heavily in Brazilian Oil (Petrobas) Obama promised 10 billion of our tax dollars to Brazil so they could expand their offshore oil fields. Now that may be a windfall for Soros and Brazil, but it is a bad deal for the U.S. The American Petroleum Institute estimates that oil exploration in the U.S. could create 160,000 new, well-paying jobs, as well as $1.7 trillion in revenues to federal, state, and local governments, all while fostering greater energy security. Do you get the feeling that American taxpayers are being treated like gullible suckers?” (See: Enemy Number 1 )

How could a man like Soros who left the devastation post-war Europe, came to the safety and security of the United States and was able to make a fortune here ever turn on America? The answer lies in the parable of the scorpion and the frog: the scorpion asked the frog for a ride across the pond. The frog refused because the scorpion might sting him. The scorpion assured the frog that he would never do that because they would both drown. Finally, the frog relented and let the scorpion ride across the pond on his back. Half way across, the scorpion stung the frog. As they both sunk to the bottom, the frog asked the scorpion “Why did you kill me?” The scorpion replied “Because it is in my nature”.

forthcoming:

CHAPTER 5: OH WHAT TANGLED WEBS WE WEAVE . . .

CHAPTER 6: THE DEVIL’S COUP D’ ETAT

CHAPTER 7: A BREACH OF TRUST

CHAPTER 8: THE BRAVE NEW WORLD OF GEORGE SOROS

CHAPTER 9: A POLITICIAN WHO STAYS BOUGHT

CHAPTER 10: SPYING ON AMERICANS

CHAPTER 11: THE BRAVE NEW ROME

CHAPTER 12: THE GHOST OF PAUL REVERE

author: Bill Boe 11/03/2009

THE GHOST OF PAUL REVERE

First they called us racists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a racist;

Then they called us a mob, and I did not speak out—because I was not a mobster;

Then they threatened a news network, and I did not speak out—because I was not a journalist;

Then they destroyed our country, and I did not speak out—because I wanted to believe their lies;

Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak out for me. . . . .