Skip to content


November 9, 2009

Editor’s Note:
This chapter pierces the veil of the of the Soros charitable network and reveals its subversive nature. The particular organizations that comprise the Soros network are listed in the link below. These types of organizations were used to bring the government of President Shevardnadze because he would not play ball with Soros. In fact, Shevardnadze accused Soros of this and Soros as much admitted it. The methods were elucidated in the prior chapter. These actions in Georgia and other parts of Eastern Europe allowed Soros to boast to a journalist that the old Soviet Empire is now the Soros Empire.


“Oh what tangled webs we weave–when first we practice to deceive”. . . In 1979, Soros established an organization called The Open Society Institute. The stated purpose of that organization is: “to build vibrant and tolerant democracies whose governments are accountable to their citizens. . . to shape public policies that assure greater fairness in political, legal and economic systems and safeguard fundamental rights . . . to implement a range of initiatives to advance justice, education, public health and independent media . . . to build alliances across borders and continents on issues such as corruption and freedom of information . . . to improve the lives of people in marginalized communities . . . etc.”(See: OSI Mission Statement)

Fine and well. But how can a man who tells us that he has no regrets about confiscating the personal effects of fellow Jews bound for Nazi death camps; no qualms about decimating the life savings of working class people through predatory currency speculation in Britain; and no reluctance to use shock therapy in Eastern Europe, claim to have a serious intent to “promote justice, fight corruption and improve the lives of people in marginalized communities”, and then put $5 billion dollars where his mouth is? The sentiment is admirable but the underlying motivation is suspect in view of his prior actions. Why then does he engage in charitable activities on a scale such as this?

(See: Contrarian View)

Why then does he do it?

The Gilded Age offers one possible answer. Andrew Carnegie made a fortune in the steel business along the Monongahela River and then wrote an essay called “The Gospel of Wealth”. The central premise was the wealthy entrepreneur must dispense his fortune in a socially beneficial way, and not allow it to be wasted on frivolous expenditure. (Wikipedia) To that end, Carnegie gave money to libraries and other socially worthwhile causes. However, there is no evidence that Carnegie ever sought to destroy the United States so he could construct a New World Order. Obviously, Soros is not Carnegie. In fact, he is the opposite.

To comprehend the true motive of a man like Soros, we must analyze the nature of the organizations he is funding. Then we must think about how they fit in an overall plan of creative destruction. The first subset consists of entities which have a charitable purpose. Soros builds global good will through them. The second subset consists of entities which have a distinctly political purpose. They include radical left wing think tanks, law firms, academic groups, internet companies, media outlets, media watchdogs, bloggers and community activists. (Note: The most comprehensive list of The Organizations Funded by Soros)

The operative question, then, is why does Soros fund these groups? Because he uses these organizations to subvert governments that will not play ball with his globalist agenda and replace them with ones that will. As Neil Clark put it, Soros used the Open Society Institute to weaken the existing political structures and pave the way for Eastern Europe’s eventual colonization by global capital.”

The Velvet Revolution in Georgia is the paradigmatic example. In 2003 Soros targeted Georgian President Eduard Shevardnadze for overthrow. Soros’ aim was the destruction of Russia as a world power. Eliminating Russian influence and replacing it with new regimes hostile to Russia was his goal. Soros had originally sought to control Shevardnadze, having met him in the 1980s when Saakashvili was Soviet foreign minister. Even then Soros was setting up his Open Society Institute in Georgia. In 2002 Shevardnadze made complaints against what he deemed Soros’ subversive activities. Soros responded that Shevardnadze could not be trusted to hold fair elections, and that he would mobilize his street lackeys, adding: “This is what we did in Slovakia at the time of Meciar, in Croatia at the time of Tudjman and in Yugoslavia at the time of Milosevic.”

The Soros’ Open Society Institute sent a 31-year-old Tbilisi activist named Giga Bokeria to Serbia to meet with members of the Otpor (Resistance) movement and learn how they used street demonstrations to topple dictator Slobodan Milosevic. Then, in the summer, Mr. Soros’s foundation paid for a return trip to Georgia by Otpor activists, who ran three-day courses teaching more than 1,000 students how to stage a peaceful revolution.” (Note: like Camp Obama perhaps?) Soros gave the anti-Shevardnadze movement a considerable nudge: He also funded a popular opposition television station that was crucial in mobilizing support for this week’s “velvet revolution,” and he reportedly gave financial support to a youth group that led the street protests.” The street protest eventually forced Shevardnadze to sign his resignation papers.

(Note: In the eyes of Mr. Soros’s employees, it was all done in the name of building democracy.The useful idiots of the Left had done the work of a globalist money speculator, marching under self-proclaimed ‘high ideals’, again fulfilling Oswald Spengler’s political dictum that ‘there is not a left-wing movement, not even the communists, who do not operate in the interests dictated by Money).

(See: Russo-Georgian Conflict Originates With Soros Subversion )









Author: Bill Boe 11/03/2009


First they called us racists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a racist;

Then they called us a mob, and I did not speak out—because I was not a mobster;

Then they threatened a news network, and I did not speak out—because I was not a journalist;

Then they destroyed our country, and I did not speak out—because I wanted to believe their lies;

Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak out for me. . . . .

  1. November 10, 2009 1:44 am

    Admin note:

    Feeling a little impotent today?

  2. November 10, 2009 2:46 pm

    The claim that George Soros was a Nazi collaborator is false and deeply offensive. As a 13-year-old child Soros was hidden with an official of the Ministry of Agriculture. Soros’s father helped hide the official’s Jewish wife and the official agreed to let young Soros pose as his Christian godson in return. This is how Soros was able to survive the Nazi occupation. On one occasion the official went to inventory the estate of a Jewish family that had fled Hungary under duress. He brought the child in his charge along rather than leaving him alone in Budapest. To construe this as Soros “collaborating with Nazis” is false, malicious and deeply misleading. Anybody interested in more detail can look at page 37 of the biography of Soros by Michael Kaufman “The Messianic Billionaire”. Anyone interested more broadly in what Soros supports can look at

    With the help of his barber, Tivadar found a place for George with a man named Baumbach, an employee of the Ministry of Agriculture. Baumbach, who was of German origin, had a Jewish wife and was paying to have her hidden in the countryside. Tivadar paid him to take George into his home, ostensibly as his godson. Tivadar turned over the apartment facing Parliament to his Gentile secretary and moved into the secret room.
    Within days of arriving at Baumbach’s, George went for a walk into the Buda hills, where lost in a daydream he moved beyond the city limits. When he turned back, he was stopped by Hungarian gendarmes. “I remember it quite clearly,” he recalled. “I had just arrived at Baumbach’s…I had walked too far. I was frightened but nothing happened. It was the first test of my using a false name and I passed it.”
    While he was living with Baumbach as Sandor Kiss, an event occurred that more than half a century later would become the basis of charges that George Soros, the international financier and billionaire, had somehow collaborated with Nazi occupiers of his homeland and had exploited his fellow Jews. The issue was raised in a bizarre television profile and interview of Soros aired on the CBS television program 60 Minutes in December of 1998. In the segment, Steve Kroft, the interviewed, noted with prosecutorial gusto that George’s father had “bribed a government official to swear that you were his godson,” and added that this survival strategy “carried a heavy price tag.” For, he continued, “as hundreds of thousands of Jews were being shipped off to the Nazi death camps, a thirteen-year-old George Soros accompanied his phony godfather on his rounds, confiscating property from the Jews.” Visibly dumbfounded by the line of questioning, Soros could only manage to say that he had no role in the seizure of property and was merely a spectator. To underscore Kroft’s point, film footage showed masses of Hungarian Jews being led away at gunpoint.
    This is what actually happened. Shortly after George went to live with Baumbach, the man was assigned to take inventory on the vast estate of Mor Kornfeld, an extremely wealthy aristocrat of Jewish origin. The Kornfeld family had the wealth, wisdom and connections to be able to leave some of its belongings behind in exchange for permission to make their way to Lisbon. Baumbach was ordered to go to the Kornfeld estate and inventory the artworks, furnishings, and other property. Rather than leave his “godson” behind in Budapest for three days, he took the boy with him. As Baumbach itemized the material, George walked around the grounds and spent time with Kornfeld’s staff. It was his first visit to such a mansion, and the first time he rode a horse. He collaborated with no one and he paid attention to what he understood to be his primary responsibility: making sure that no one doubted that he was Sandor Kiss. Among his practical concerns was to make sure that no one saw him pee. (Michael T. Kaufman, Soros: The Life and Times of a Messianic Billionaire (Alfred A. Knopf: New York 2002) 36-38.)

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: