Skip to content

Supreme Court to hear case on Obama’s alleged forged documents

January 10, 2013

See Link for all 4 photos

On Wednesday, Chief Justice John Roberts of the Supreme Court scheduled a birther case brought on by Orly Taitz which calls into question Barack Hussein Obama’s eligibility to be president of the United States. Dr. Taitz, a lawyer from Santa Margarita, Calif., also made the announcement on her website on Jan. 9.

As of this writing, major news networks such as ABC, Fox News, CBS, and NBC have yet to report on the high court’s decision to review Barack Hussein Obama’s eligibility to hold political office in the United States or any of its territories. The case is identified as Edward Noonan, et al., v. Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State.

On Feb. 15, all nine justices will hear arguments on whether Obama used forged government documents and fake identification in order to get elected as commander-in-chief. Edward Noonan, et al., contend that if Obama had been ineligible to run in 2008, other Democratic candidates should have replaced him on the presidential ballot. Additionally, electoral votes from states such as California that went towards Obama should have been deemed null and void.

The Supreme Court’s website shows that docket file no. 12A606 was originally denied by Justice Anthony Kennedy, a Reagan appointee, on Dec. 13. On Jan. 9, Chief Justice Roberts sent Dr. Taitz’s application to the full court for a review scheduled for Feb. 15.

Despite the lack of exposure from the mainstream media, the issue appears to have gained some steam among conservative bloggers. On Jan. 9, New York Times best-selling author Jerome Corsi suggested that the president’s nominee to head the Central Intelligence Agency, John Brennan, may have played a role in removing birther evidence from Barack Obama’s passport records.

It appears that in 2008, a State Department insider was simultaneously employed by Analysis Corporation of McLean, Va. (then headed by Mr. Brennan) and was reprimanded for accessing (and possibly altering) Obama’s.

passport records.

On Wednesday, Dr. Orly Taitz, who represents the birther cause, posted the following on her website:

The case . . . provides a mountain of evidence of Barack Obama using a last name not legally his, forged Selective Service application, forged long form and short form birth certificate and a Connecticut Social Security number 042-68-4425 which was never assigned to him according to E-Verify and SSNVS.

Additionally, this case provides evidence of around one and a half million invalid voter registrations in the state of California alone.

The Supreme Court reviews about 10,000 petitions annually in regular conferences. About 100 are selected for further judicial consideration. In this filtering process, the votes of four justices are needed to advance a case. On her website, Dr. Taitz argues that Obama has used false identification, an alias, a fake Social Security number, forged birth certificates and Selective Service applications. [ See a comparison of a regular birth certificate versus one submitted by Barack Obama in this photo. ]

Among the aliases Obama allegedly used are Barry Soetoro (used while teaching law at the University of Chicago) and Harrison J. Bounel. Birthers contend that by entering Obama’s claimed Social Security number (042-68-4425) into background check systems, the name Harrison J. Bounel shows up in search results. Forgery of government documents is considered a felony.

This is not the first time that Obama has had to contend with the birther issue. On Aug. 21 2008, Philip J. Berg, a former deputy attorney general of Pennsylvania, brought a federal lawsuit challenging the eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama to become president. Berg alleged that Obama was born in Mombasa, Kenya and that the “Certification of Live Birth” on Obama’s website is a forgery.

The lower federal court dismissed the complaint as “unworthy of further discussion”. Soon after, Berg filed a petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Supreme Court which was denied by Justice David Souter in Nov. 2008. A second petition was denied by Justice Anthony Kennedy.

A third petition was referred to the Supreme Court by Justice Antonin Scalia. However, the high court rejected the writ of certiorari on Jan. 12, 2009, just eight days away from Obama’s first inauguration as the nation’s 44th chief executive.

A team of forensic experts organized by Arizona sheriff Joe Arpaio have looked into Obama’s birth certificate. In July 2012, Arpaio told Fox News his team’s conclusion that Obama’s birth certification is “definitely fraudulent”. After months of investigation, his forensic investigators had discovered code errors, computer-generated marks, and manipulated seals on the document.

In April 2011, the White House retracted the Hawaii certificate and replaced it with a long form version. Around the same time, business tycoon Donald Trump sent a team of investigators to the state of Hawaii to question Obama’s real place of birth.

Said Trump:

He [Obama] spent $2 million in legal fees trying on to get away from this issue, and if it weren’t an issue, why wouldn’t he just solve it? I wish he would because if he doesn’t, it’s one of the greatest scams in the history of politics and in the history, period. You are not allowed to be a president if you’re not born in this country. Right now, I have real doubts.

The issue gained steam in the midst of a highly contentious election year as Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney gained favor among the voting public. In May 2012, the president’s former literary agent Acton & Dystel produced a previously unpublished leaflet stating that Obama was “born in Kenya and raised in Indonesia and Hawaii”. The promotional booklet was written in 1991 when Obama was at Harvard Law School. It was intended to be part of an Obama autobiography but the project was cancelled.

In Oct. 2012, just days before November presidential elections, Mr. Trump offered to donate $5 million to Obama’s chosen charity if the commander-in-chief would disclose his college and passport records. Trump had hoped that the disclosures would shed light on where Barack Obama was born, his citizenship status, and whether or not he was admitted to college and law school as a foreign exchange student. President Obama ignored Trump’s challenge in media interviews and refused to release the requested records.

However, comedian Bill Maher did issue a challenge to Mr. Trump to produce his birth certificate in exchange for $5 million donated to the latter’s favorite charity. Maher made the offer on Jan. 7 on “The Tonight Show with Jay Leno”. On Tuesday, the real estate tycoon produced a birth certificate showing that he was born in New York City. Trump’s lawyer then issued a letter asking the HBO host to make good on his $5 million offer.

Attached hereto is a copy of Mr. Trump’s birth certificate, demonstrating that he is the son of Fred Trump, not an orangutan. Please remit the $5 million to Mr. Trump immediately and he will ensure that the money be donated to the following five charities in equal amounts: Hurricane Sandy Victims, The Police Athletic League, The American Cancer Society, The March of Dimes, and The Dana-Farber Cancer Institute.


  1. January 14, 2013 4:13 pm


    What in the world does this mean? “My Understanding?” really!

    “My understanding is the vice president’s going to provide a range of steps that we can take to reduce gun violence,” said Obama. “Some of them will require legislation, some of them I can accomplish through executive action. And so I will be reviewing those today, and as I said, I will speak in more detail to what we’re going to go ahead and propose later in the week. But I’m confident that there are some steps that we can take that don’t require legislation and that are within my authority as president, and where you get a step that, has the opportunity to reduce the possibility of gun violence, then i want to go ahead and take it.”


    Very problematic. Good Faith is NOT Obama’s strong suit. He has never given us reason to TRUST anything he says….is in the best interests of the People. Just the opposite.

  2. January 14, 2013 9:40 pm

    MIT’s Noam Chomsky: Obama’s Running a ‘Global Assassination Campaign’

    After watching “Body of Lies” a movie released (pre-drone) in 08′. you would think the machinations of the movie was exactly like the current climate in the ME, that te movie was released last week.

    However, Chomsky, does make a valid point regarding a ‘global assassination campaign’ going on in the ME. The drone campaign is taking out important al quada leasers and we think this sounds like a good thing, maybe. What if… the only reason BO is targeting these leaders is because they refuse to co-operate with him? Which could very well be the only logical explanation. Maybe BO is looking to control the actions of a group such as al quada replaced with his loyalists putting him mostly in control of the Eastern and Western Hemispheres?

    OH- I forgot to add, what happens when East meets West?

    The West is massacred by the East as Obama sits permanently in the seat of power, as was planned all along? Wake up everyone.. there will never be another election in the US!

  3. January 15, 2013 9:30 am

    We have a Dicktater.He does what ever he wants. 👿

  4. January 15, 2013 9:33 am

    Obama is afraid. Well he should be. He has galvanized the country against him by his own words because of his bizarre stand on gun control issues rather than addressing the underlying cause for the shootings, mental health issues. And Obmama has been forced to eat his own words on the debt ceiling after castigating Bush2 on his spending during his term.. If ever Impeachment should take place, the time is now. If Congressmen really believe their own words, stop threatening and just go ahead and Impeach him while you have the full support of the country. Before Obama backs down placating his supporters with government funded cab fare or some such ridiculous freebie and the Impeachment movement loses steam.


    Demand for information under 5US 552 or alternatively under Touhy v Regan340 U.S. 462 (1951)

    Dear sir/mdm

    On Sunday afternoon on 01.13.2013 I placed a petition on Within hours by Monday morning the petition had 945 signatures of citizens of 49 states and was sure to reach the required 25,000 signatures within 30 days in order to receive a response from the President of the United States according to the rules of the site.

    Such an enormous response from the public reflected the importance of the petition and great public concern.

    In and around 8:30 in the morning on Monday 01.14.2013 this petition disappeared from the website.

    Members of the public who tried to sign it received a response that it violated the policy of the website and was removed for that reason.

    When members of the public complained, an e-mail was sent from the site, stating that the petition violated the privacy right.

    I submitted a demand to reinstate the petition or provide me with an explanation, what part of the petition violated the privacy right and whose privacy right. I did not receive an answer.

    As such I demand information to be provided to me under Freedom of Information Act 5US 552. I demand to know, why specifically my petition, so popular with the public nationwide, was removed. I demand to know, which part of the petition violated the privacy right and whose privacy.
    If you refuse to provide the information under 5 U.S.552, I demand information to be provided to me under United States ex rel. Touhy v. Ragen – 340 U.S. 462 (1951)

    /s/ Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ

    This is the latest update from Dr. Taitz..

  5. January 15, 2013 10:27 am


Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: