Skip to content

The Boston Marathon Bombing was an indirect blowback from Benghazi…

April 23, 2013

Obama’s blood trail from Benghazi to Boston

If we persist on taking a myopic view of the incidents happening over the last seven months, we are missing the totality of the transformation of our country under a globalist agenda. I know, it’s as stretch taxing our minds connecting these dots but as painful as it has been for us over recent months, it must be done to understand the metamorphosis taking place in our country before our very eyes.

Are you still wondering why it seems there is no opposition to our democratically controlled government? Where is the outrage from Republicans over the safety of the country? Where is the deafening roar of outrage we heard during the Lewinski scandal?

Why the branding of Bill Clinton by Republican minions as unfit for the presidency shouted from the rooftops and the sordid details of the affair played out 24/7 on tv by Big media in special reports, as the country was in a state of so called peril, triggering the House of Representatives to call for Impeachment proceedings to begin immediately?

Was Bill Clinton guilty of attempting to shred and break the Constitution by taking our guns from our cold dead hands? Was he demanding citizens say nothing negative about the Irish out of fear we were offending their sensibilities or insulting their beliefs in their lifelong Catholic/Protestant religions?

Hardly- He had an affair people. Like so many members of Congress, the very people who condemned him. Later on one by one they confessed to their so-called youthful indiscretions..example [sic] House Manager, Henry Hyde.. (keeping a mistress and supporting a child out of wedlock.)

(the Clinton comparison is strictly for gaining a perspective to the current threats before us and the unrelenting undoing of our Constitution by Executive fiat)

What do the murders of four Americans in Benghazi have to do with the murders of three in a terrorist attack in Boston? Plenty, if you understand what you are seeing in the abstract expressionism of the Jackson Pollock painting is actually a blood trail, and the Pollock painting you are closely studying is an exact reproduction of one of his earlier works. It is a reproduction of a reproduction. We’ve seen this picture before, a bloodstained tangle of lies being sold to us as an artistic masterpiece. But you have to step farther back, not closer to the painting, to actually see the blood trail.

(the illustration at the link is a Pollack painting revealing traces of blood after a forensic examination by art experts.) I will defer to this article helping you gain a much wider perspective written by By Doug Hagmann @ Canada Free Press.

Read it until you realize we are under attack while we sleep- Benghazi and the Boston Bombings are the overt examples that have to be explained away by our government as diverse unrelated events that are unfortunate but do happen occasionally but under the watchful eye of Homeland Security “we will ensure they never happen again.”

Does anyone still remember the terror attack and murders of Americans in Benghazi on September 11, 2012? Does anyone still care?

In the wake of the bombings in Boston and amid information the government and media does not want you, the average American citizen to know, motive and causation make a lot of difference. Compare Clinton’s terse response to questions surrounding Benghazi with that of Department of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano, whose testosterone levels rose sharply as she decided that she would not even dignify Congressman Jeff Duncan’s questioning last week about the reported involvement of a Saudi national identified as Abdulrahman Ali Isa al-Salami al-Harbi, a/k/a Abdulrahman al Harbi.

The Saudi connections

In the event you don’t recognize that name associated with the Boston bombing, the media initially reported that a Saudi national, later determined to be al Harbi, was under guard at a Boston hospital after being injured in the attack. He was seen running from the explosions and tackled by police a short distance from the bombing site. During the normal investigative process of al Harbi, investigators learned that he was reportedly the subject of an alleged deportation order under Section 212 3B Immigration & Nationality Act regarding “Security an”, but completely unrelated to Boston. To get on this list requires some pretty substantial evidence. To be removed from this list is practically impossible, short of detention or death.

Amid the flurry of media reports that followed, however, his name and status at the hospital were gradually and methodically being erased from news reports and people’s memories. An intentional government and media brown-out turned into a noticeable blackout, even while federal authorities were searching his fifth floor apartment at 364 Ocean Avenue, Revere, MA and removing various items for forensic analysis.

Before the last items were taken from his apartment, I am told, orders were given to immediately stop any investigation of al Harbi. Suddenly and inexplicably, al Harbi became off limits, and a few federal agents are angry and want to know why.

His status under Section 212 3B was reportedly rescinded about 5:30 p.m. ET Wednesday, and he suddenly enjoyed protective status on orders from the ‘highest levels of our government’, but not before Congressman Duncan had a copy of the 212 3B status of al Harbi. Additionally, it is reported, not only was the order rescinded, but his file was made to appear as if the order never existed in the first place.

According to sources close to this author, al Harbi became the primary focus of a high level diplomatic meeting between U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry and Saudi Foreign Minister Saud al Faisal on Tuesday morning, the day after the marathon bombing and the day before his status suddenly changed. The 10:00 am meeting was abruptly closed to the media with only minutes notice, something that rarely happens. The reason, according to sources with “knowledge” of the matter, is due to the classification of al Harbi as a person of interest in the marathon bombing and his status as a Saudi “elite”.

The aforementioned file alteration and status were changed following this meeting, and arrangements were reportedly made for him to leave the United States. As all of this reportedly took place in such a very short period of time, it is important to understand that the alleged changes had to have the approval at the level of the U.S. Secretary of State, or higher. It was done on behalf of the Saudis, with approval and direction from the highest levels of our own government. Why is this important to the events in Boston and Benghazi?

Benghazi to Boston: the Saudi agenda & shielding the truth

First, don’t get stuck in the minutia of al Harbi, just be aware of it and who is behind it. Instead, look at the larger picture. To be clear, al Harbi himself is not the main story here. It’s bigger than that, and the problem is that people are not thinking big enough. It’s about an agenda to shape the world power structure. The Obama regime is in place to finish what was started long ago. Now, the players under Obama and a complicit press are shielding the truth from the American people. We are not being told the truth about anything, from Benghazi to Boston, and the common factor in all of this is Saudi Arabia.

Our intimate relationship with Saudi Arabia began in earnest (most recently) under George Herbert Walker Bush, and was further expanded by George W. Bush, a/k/a ‘Bandar Bush,’ a name earned for his intimate relationship with Prince Sultan bin Bandar of Saudi Arabia. It should be clear by now that the continuity of this globalist, Pan-Islamic agenda that existed under Bush was further solidified and even expanded by the Obama administration. It is not a political agenda, but a globalist one. We do not have elected leaders who favor the U.S., but internationalists that favor the globalist agenda. Understanding this should explain that the right-left paradigm is a historical artifact, and provide prospective in terms of how the government is pushing this agenda towards completion. We’ve been overtaken and captured from within.

We’ve learned from the 2001 attacks that the Saudis are the largest exporters of terrorism, yet we continue to work for them, providing our military assets and our troops to doing their dirty work. Through the Muslim Brotherhood, they have infiltrated many, if not all levels of our government. As stated, this did not begin under Obama, but was expanded under him. And what better presidential candidate was there to accomplish this objective? Now does his meteoric rise from a community organizer to state senator to President make better sense? (do notice the lack of complicity and inclusion of one name…Clinton)

We still cannot even have any intelligent conversation about Obama’s Constitutional legitimacy to hold the Office of President without being marginalized by both sides of the political divide. Why then, would we expect the truth about Benghazi? And yet, Americans believe what they see and hear about everything from Benghazi, Boston, and even to matters of our economy? We are a captured operation.

Just as the situation involving al Harbi provides us with a window into this agenda, Benghazi provides us with that same window. Unraveling the truth from the lies in both instances will show just how deep the U.S. is involved with expanding the Saudi Kingdom of power across the Middle East, even at our own national peril. Of critical importance, this relationship is leading us on the path to World War III.

Remember this? Obama bowing to the Saudi King? Now you know why!

Before the marathon bombings, Russian intelligence officials warned the U.S. about the Islamic terror threat posed by Islamic terrorists in the U.S., including the older brother of the Boston bombing duo. The FBI KNEW the identity of the elder Boston bomber a year ago. Yet, the U.S. DHS, under the Obama regime, deliberately ignored the warnings. We’re spreading and actually sponsoring this radicalization through this Pan-Islamic agenda, yet most people cannot see the bigger picture.

Putin warned us that our policies were the equivalent of playing with dynamite, and continuing to play would result in a direct confrontation with them. During the so-called Arab Spring, Putin also warned the U.S. not to destabilize the Middle East, and warned Obama not to meddle in the affairs of Syria, which he described as their ‘red line in the sand’. Syria holds strategic military and economic importance for Russia and China, and is the backdoor to Iran, another country of importance to both superpowers.

Despite these warnings, the U.S. set up the largest weapons running operation in Benghazi, a location from where weapons were shipped under U.S. operational command to the Islamic terrorists in Syria to topple the Assad regime. The Saudis were the paymasters for this operation, but are duplicitous.

Benghazi was the direct result of this operation, and we now find ourselves in a proxy war with Russia-and soon to be China-with no peaceful end in sight as the U.S. continues to do the dirty work for the Saudis, the internationalists, the international bankers, and the global elite. The terror attacks in Boston were the latest blowback from our foreign policy, and there will be more.

Janet Napolitano, and the entirety of the Obama regime are refusing to provide Americans with any truths about what is actually taking place, whether it is about a sole Saudi citizen or the attacks in Benghazi, and complete Saudi agenda. Meanwhile, clueless Americans cheer as the younger bombing suspect is arrested after one of the most unprecedented manhunts in U.S. history, but fail to see all of the entanglements of the Pollock painting. We are willfully and almost gleefully giving up our rights because of the globalists who are running the foreign and domestic policies.

The path to WW III

Like the Pollock paintings, people must be able to see the connections—the blood trails—that connect the terrorist attacks in Boston to the terrorist attacks in Benghazi. We are emboldening the Muslim terrorists by our foreign policies. We are training them, arming them, and in some cases, siding with one faction over another. We are not exporting peace or freeing people from oppression, but creating a new world order.

Time and again, from the first World Trade Center Bombing to 9/11, from Benghazi to Boston, we see the same template reproductions of the paintings, yet don’t recognize it.

We are not dealing with Americans with an American mentality. No, we are dealing with Americans in name only, driven by an internationalist, global mentality.

The ‘elected’ are the ‘elect’ vying for a future seat at the global table. They are hidden amid the entanglements of the Pollock work. They are the very ones who will lead us into global conflict.

So when you see the next massive manhunt that closes a city, understand that this is of our own doing. This is part of a larger agenda that you must step back from the painting to identify. While we surrender our rights domestically, we advance on the path that takes us into WW III. Boston was an indirect blowback from Benghazi, but the truth of the matter will continue to remain hidden unless we demand and receive answers to the proper questions. That is assuming, of course, there is anyone left to ask such questions.

Step back and look at the larger picture. See the blood trail that extends among the continents.

It you want the Truth of what is happening to our country, you won’t find it on American TV. You will have to search out the Truth yourself from overseas reports or read here for new postings.

  1. April 24, 2013 1:37 am

    from foxy41’s link:



    a photo of the ‘turd blossom’ making this statement..


    UN Human Rights Council “expert” Richard Falk has published a statement saying Bostonians got what they deserved in last week’s terror attack. He quotes W.H. Auden to make his point: “to whom evil is done/do evil in return.”

    Richard Falk is the UN’s “Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories occupied since 1967.” He has held the post since 2008, despite exposure as a 9/11 conspiracy theorist.

    In his latest rant, published online on April 21, 2013 by Falk repeats the libel that prior to 9/11 President George W. Bush was seeking a “pretext” for war, and that anything Israel is the opposite of “justice and peace.”

    And then he attacks Bostonians head-on. The police action in Boston was a “hysterical dragnet.” Boston’s dead were “canaries” that “have to die” because of America’s “fantasy of global domination.”

    Falk explains the attacks as justifiable “resistance.” In his words: “The American global domination project is bound to generate all kinds of resistance in the post-colonial world.”
    He minimizes the crime and predicts worse if America doesn’t change its ways to better accommodate the demands of “the Islamic world.” As he puts it: “In some respects, the United States has been fortunate not to experience worse blowbacks, and these may yet happen…”.

    For years, Falk has been espousing the worst forms of antisemitism from his UN perch, and for his efforts has been rewarded with repeated opportunities by the Council to lecture others on his world view.

    That world view is shared by the 56 member states of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), who only a week ago at UN Headquarters refused to define terrorism unless an exception clause was created for “legitimate struggle.”
    The OIC controls the balance of power at the UN’s top human rights body, by holding majorities in both the African and Asian regional groups. Africa and Asia, in turn, control 26 of the 47 seats on the Council. With the backing of the OIC, therefore, Falk has been encouraged and protected.

    The Obama administration has long championed the UN Human Rights Council, which it decided to join as one of its first foreign policy moves in 2009. Thanks to the Obama administration, U.S. began a second three-year term on the Council this past January. At the opening of the Council’s most recent session in March, Assistant Secretary of State Esther Brimmer traveled to Geneva to address what she called “this esteemed body.”

    There is nothing about a “human rights” body that countenances the likes of Richard Falk that is “esteemed,” and the United States should resign–effective immediately.


    The UN stands for one thing only…UNAmerican… and is the vehicle used by globalists like George Soros for promoting their agenda… Dump this organ of destruction asap..

    I couldn’t have said it any better than these folks did in the comment section:


    I haven’t known a single American who’s supported the UN since about 1975. Their headquarters take up a vast amount of very expensive NY real estate. UNICEF is one of the most fraudulent of the international charities. The UN’s main purposes appear to be the annihilation of Israel, to extort money from the US and to criticize us in return. Richard Falk is nuts and always has been. He’s also 83 years old .And, of course, I could go on and on. I’d love to see a national poll on just how many Americans want out of the UN- effective ASAP.

    progressiveduper mickeyco

    The United Nations was founded as a vehicle to promote fabianist policy, and eventually total globalism. Although the U.S. most certainly acquires intelligence through it’s headquarters in NY, the globalist policies are detrimental to the America’s founding principals. The organization would wither and eventually decay without the US support and funding. The UN is now a “siphon-port” for US taxpayer dollars to be distributed to third-world leaders around the globe.

    Loral Orow progressiveduper

    Exactly! And that means our money goes to these former dictators and not to the poor people they rule. Saddam had 7 or 8 castles for his family, all over Iraq while the citizens there barely had food. When we set up the Oil for Food program at the beginning of the Iraqi war, the wonderful dictators were given the job of making the trade, but all they did was take the money we put out there & put it in their own pockets. When the truth came out, they just hung their heads and continued in their positions. We must get those horrible people out of our country and stop bringing Islam and Jihadism into a civilized world.

  2. April 24, 2013 1:51 am

    April 23, 2013 at 8:29 pm

    GOP blaming Hillary for Benghazi in new report. This issue will
    haunt her should she run in 2016

    jbstones fan… How about Hillary response goes something like this:

    GOP’s inquiry into the American deaths in Benghazi:

    “I’ve waited so long- I thought no one would ever ask”..

  3. April 26, 2013 1:22 pm

    Marxist Meme Wars: The Tea Party is like . . . . Al-Qaeda? anarchists?

    April 25, 2013 by Brenda J. Elliott

    One thing you can be sure of is that the Marxist propagandists are brewing up a new batch of vile-tasting bitters when they’re losing the message wars and “unexpectedly” resort to duking it out in meme wars instead. This time it appears that current and former Congress Critters have their undies all twisted into knots because they just don’t know what to do about those Tea Party terrorists bringing common sense and reason to the legislative halls in the nation’s capitol.

    Mind you that what you are about to read is nothing new. Marxists just cannot allow any minor crisis go to waste.

    Take former Massachusetts Rep. Barney Frank, for example. The recent issue of Inspire, Al-Qaeda’s top-shelf magazine for budding jihadis like the pressure-cooker-bomb-making Tsarnaev brothers, criticized Frank’s sexual orientation.

    Barney “compared the terrorist organization to the Tea Party and cracked that the two groups are ‘aligned’ with each other against gay marriage,” Joel Gehrke reported in the Washington Examiner. Gehrke continued:

    “I wonder how the right wing in America feels about being aligned with al-Qaeda?” Frank said to Buzzfeed, adding that “there is an irony that the most active anti-gay [groups] are al-Qaeda and the American right-wing.”

    The latest issue of Al-Qaeda’s Inspire magazine spotlights “Barney Frank, Gay Congressman, Symbol of the American Dream” to argue that the United States is “a nation standing on no values.”

    “It sounded like what the Tea party said when I got married,” Frank replied.

    Barney’s delusional logic aside — maybe it’s that pot smoke swirling around his head that has him spewing trash — could he please provide one example of what the apparently-monolithic Tea Party bothered to comment on his marriage? (It obviously escapes Barney that the Tea Party is anything but monolithic as he cannot name a single individual for his attribution.)

    Figuratively hot on Barney’s heels, Senate Majority Leader “Dirty Harry” Reid compared the Tea Party to “anarchists.” Tony Lee reported at

    Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) believes the Tea Party is ideologically similar to anarchists and that government is “inherently good.”

    Speaking on the Senate floor on Tuesday, Reid said he was frustrated that, “We have a situation where this country has been driven by the Tea Party for the last number of years.” He then insinuated Tea Partiers were like anarchists.

    “When I was in school, I studied government and I learned about the anarchists. Now, they were different than the Tea Party because they were violent,” Reid said. “But they were anarchists because they did not believe in government in any level and they acknowledged it.”

    Reid asserted that unlike the anarchists he learned about in school, the Tea Party “kind of hides that” by not acknowledging, he claimed, that they do not believe in any form of government.

    “They don’t say they’re against government, but that is what it all amounts to,” Reid said. “They’re not doing physically destructive things to buildings and people, directly, but they are doing everything they can to throw a monkey wrench into every form of government, whether it’s local, state, or federal.”

    Reid was upset that Tea Partiers are “happy” to slow down government. “Government is not inherently bad,” he retorted; “government is inherently good.”

    Harry must be getting senile. He definitely needs to go back to school. In the 1940s and 1950s, when he was a lad, the anarchists were well known to be Lefties — insurrectionists, socialists, Marxists, Communists, syndicalists, anti-colonials, anti-imperialists — and bore not a whiff of resemblance to today’s conservative members of the Tea Party.

    Anarchists perform acts of terrorism to push their anti-establishment agenda. Perhaps Harry could name just one member of the Tea Party who has blown anything up or led a violent mass protest against the government or murdered hundreds of people just to make his or her point. Just what I thought.

  4. Anonymous permalink
    April 27, 2013 12:45 pm

    Foxy- you are a gem. You find the most obscure ‘should be’ news links:


    Coburn on FAA Furloughs: It’s Not Real, It’s Cynical and It’s Shameful

    ‘When management tells the union people, we want you all to take your furlough the same day so we shut down the airlines in America, I would tell you, there’s where your problem is’

    Washington Free Beacon Staff
    April 25, 2013 4:08 pm

    Sen. Tom Coburn (R., Okla.) revealed he has gained access to a letter from an anonymous whistle blower inside the FAA Thursday on CNBC.

    The letter accuses the federal agency of encouraging all union employees take the same furlough days in a coordinated effort to disrupt air travel:

    RICK SANTELLI: Senator, it’s quite simple. You’re receiving e-mails from FAA employees attending meetings where they’ve been told to make these furloughs as hard on the public as possible. How can we have a government or a Secretary of Transportation that allows this to occur? It’s reprehensible.

    TOM COBURN: Well, you know, first of all, these are great American people who work for the FAA and they know this is a game that’s being played. I agree with you. The fact is is the 2013 budget request by the Obama Administration is essentially the same level of which this post-sequester FAA budget is. So it’s all a game. And it’s the desire not to trim the size of the federal government and to hurt the American people, the American airlines, the businesses that are dependent upon it, and do it in such a cynical way, as they think the American people are going to believe this. The fact is, they’re still keeping on board to train people, even though they’re shutting down the schools. So they are going to be paying people, instructors, who have nobody to teach. But they’re not going to furlough them. They’re furloughing the controllers, and there’s 650 fewer controllers now than there [were] in 2010, they’re making a ton more. They don’t need anything new to change and fit within this sequester. It’s all dishonest.

    If true, the letter would provide further evidence the Obama Administration is politically engineering sequester cuts to cause pain among the general population.

    The attempted political manipulation of air traffic controller furlough days is the latest in a series of sequester cuts that have raised ire among critics as being politically motivated and unnecessary.

    The Obama Administration fell under criticism in March for suspending White House tours. The Secret Service has remained steadfast in maintaining the suspension, despite the policy change netting a paltry savings of $74,000 per week.

  5. May 9, 2013 8:29 pm

    Well, it seems I am missing so much happening because I’ve been residing at an undisclosed location (the wilderness) where Internet connections and cell phones are a bit unrefined and mainstream enough for as easy (taken for granted) connection as it is at home.

    However, while shut out of conversing with everyone over current happenings…. I’m not letting the grass grow under my feet regarding the future outlook of America with this administration…

    I am reading a book on my Kindle, written by The Ulsterman… entitled “DOMINATUS”


    See link:

    The book doesn’t spare the horses when naming names within the current leadership responsible for the destruction of the America we once knew in the not too distant future.

    The story begins as the result of Benghazi’s tragic events and oddly enough the new paradigms set forth in ObamaCare schedued to take hold in 2014.. which is the turning point of our country’s survival as a sovereign nation and the Liberty we used to enjoy as a Free People. The book is fiction but the current events are real and accurate pivoting on the Gun Control issues before us today. The book has been made affordable to every American in the country.. and the hope is we realize what the globalists plan for our future and knowing this; we DO NOT give up our Constitutional Rights (under some other context) allowing this to happen…

  6. May 9, 2013 9:00 pm

    The thing is we’ve got to be multi-taskers not focusing in on one issue at a time. Instead be aware of where the BO Administration is going with all these rules and regulations.. and trying to lash Hillary Clinton to the Benghazi mess thinking if they go down they will take her with them. It’s NOT going to happen.. because we won’t let it..

    I’ve been a Clintonite since the Impeachment hearings (witch hunt hearings) where the opposing party (the Republicans) were attempting to remove the Best President we have had in the 20th Century, I’m sure, you all have not forgotten the ‘Peace and Prosperity’ we experienced in the 80’s.. And have figured out or at least given a thought to what is happening now and why hasn’t Impeachment been in the headlines of the Mainstream Media. Obama has consistently been beating up our Constitution ( heck, he can’t even rest his hand over his heart during the pledge of allegiance to the flag) but there hasn’t been a whisper of condemnation by our supposed watchdog press? He has openly infringed on our Freedom of Speech, Religion and Gun Rights trying hard with threatening evocative language to suppress those Constitutional Amendments, the very foundation of our Constitution. Please don’t sit by and think nothing of it… complain to your Congress people and let your voice be heard (while we still can) and make a phone call, write a letter, telling your representatives you won’t stand for it no matter who the president is…. If he is openly and aggressively warning you not to exercise your Constitutional Rights. Tell that senator or representative you will thow them out of office in 2014 if they refuse to represent the “Will of the People” and be replaced by someone who can and will do the job they were sent there to do…

  7. May 9, 2013 9:27 pm

    Here is another example of a politician misleading the people at a Las Vegas political Fundraiser.. telling them we have defeated terrorist extremists… especially now where my most recent article details experiencing another tragedy in Boston encouraged by radical extremism.

    video find courtesy of ‘holdthemaccountable’:

  8. May 9, 2013 9:33 pm

    If you feel an itch… it’s your Rights slipping past you..

    See what is about to happen in NY… courtesy of that lunatic mayor, Bloomberg!

    Thanks, Leanora!

    NYC Considering Allowing Non-Citizens To Vote

    New York City could soon become the first major city in the country to give non-citizens the right to vote. The proposal, which would allow certain non-citizens to vote in local elections, appears to have a veto-proof majority in the New York City Council ­ enough to overcome opposition by Mayor Michael Bloomberg. As hearings on the proposal get underway Thursday, supporters are optimistic it will become law by the end of the year and believe it will have an impact beyond the five boroughs.

  9. May 10, 2013 10:46 am


    Everything written here is TRUE!

    Don’t believe it? Check the facts yourself…

    DOMINATUS will be our new reality if we don’t wake up and act now!


    Obamacare’s Pathway to Creeping Control by the State

    by Keith Koffler on April 29, 2013

    One of the gravest problems with Obamacare has nothing specifically to do with health care.

    Sure, Obamacare will destroy this country’s health care system. It may one day kill me or you. But it will also have a profound effect on the relationship you and I have with our government.

    Obamacare will, of course, bolster the sense, particularly among those who should be striving to achieve more in their lives rather than suckling ever more forcefully on the government teat, that Big Wet Nurse – aka the federal government – is there to take care of you whether you decide you’re interested in working or not.

    But even more insidious is that once the government can order you to purchase health care, it will start feeling it oats and decide that this is only the beginning of what it can tell you to do.

    Requiring private citizens to engage in a specific form of commerce is a new and pernicious abuse of government power. Most conservatives understand the need for some – even as they try to limit it – government encroachments in the form of taxes, regulations of economic behavior, and dictates in the name of national security. But telling you what you must do, as opposed to providing limited controls on what you do so that you don’t harm others and even perhaps yourself, is a brave new world.

    And so, in case you need proof, we have a mostly overlooked provision in the Obama budget – though not by CNS News – which would order all workers not enrolled in a tax-deferred retirement account to get one.

    That’s right, if this provision of President Obama’s budget passes, you are automatically enrolled in a retirement account whether you want to be or not. Even if you desperately need those funds for current expenses or are quite sure you octogenarian Aunt Noonie is going to leave you a fist full of stock options. You can opt out if you want, but the whole purpose of these “automatic opt in” schemes is that most people don’t. It’s effectively government deciding on your economic behavior.

    We’ll see more of these types of government-directed lifestyle and economic choices as people get used to being ordered by Big Wet Nurse to purchase federally mandated health insurance. One area to watch out for – and we’re already seeing it with New York City Mayor Bloomberg’s cancellation of the Big Gulp and Michelle’s requirement that kids eat slightly seasoned twigs for lunch – is government control of your diet.

    Because you, YOU, with your bag of Nachos – you’re raising everybody’s health costs and YOU’D BETTER CUT IT OUT. And if you don’t, well, we’ll just cart some Nachomakers off the jail for purposely addicting children to their product’s irresistible cheesy flavor.

    Obamacare heralds a brave new world of federal intrusion into your life. But don’t worry too much. The Politburo always knows what’s best.

  10. May 10, 2013 10:57 am

    Obama (getting nervous) wades back into the health care debate. (Too Bad for Him!)

    The old axiom: “Fool US once shame on YOU. Fool US twice, Shame on ME!”

    May 10, 5:22 AM (ET)


    WASHINGTON (AP) – President Barack Obama is launching a new effort to rally the public around his hotly disputed health care law, a strategy aimed at shoring up key components of the sweeping federal overhaul and staving off yet another challenge from Republicans.

    The president will specifically target women and young people, groups that backed him overwhelmingly during his presidential campaigns. During a Mother’s Day-themed event at the White House on Friday, Obama will promote the benefits of the law for women, including free cancer screenings and contraceptives, and ask moms to urge their uninsured adult children to sign up for the health insurance “exchanges” that open this fall.

    The exchanges are the centerpiece of the landmark overhaul of the nation’s health insurance system. Three years after it became law, the measure widely known as “Obamacare” remains controversial, with GOP lawmakers resolving anew to overturn it and many Americans unsure how they’ll be affected.

    White House advisers acknowledge they struggled in explaining the complex law to the public when it passed in 2010. Now, with the final components being implemented, Obama allies see a fresh opportunity to sell the American people on the merits of measures that will be central to the president’s legacy.

    “We’re in the phase for the actual meat of the law to come online,” said Neera Tanden of the Center for American Progress, a liberal group aligned with the White House. “It’s important for the public to recognize that the law has tangible benefits to people so they feel comfortable enrolling.”

    Beginning Oct. 1, consumers can enroll in coverage through health insurance marketplaces called “exchanges” established by the states or the federal government. Coverage under the private plans begins Jan. 1, and nearly 30 million uninsured Americans are eventually expected to take part.

    But in order to keep insurance premiums down, young, healthy people will have to join up in order to counteract the costs from seniors and others with health problems.

    The uncertainty surrounding the exchanges has many Democrats nervous, including retiring Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., one of the architects of the overhaul. He said last month that the health care law is heading for a “train wreck” because of a bumbling implementation.

    The president conceded last week that there would be “glitches and bumps” as the final phases of the health care law – formally the Affordable Health Care Act – are rolled out. But he said most people will be unaffected by the changes that are still to come.

    “For the 85 to 90 percent of Americans who already have health insurance, this thing has already happened,” Obama said. “Their only impact is that their insurance is stronger, better, more secure than it was before. Full stop. That’s it. They don’t have to worry about anything else.”

    Many Republicans strongly disagree, saying the full impact of the law will ripple throughout the economy. House Republicans announced this week that they planned to hold a vote on repealing the overhaul – the 37th time the House has voted to repeal all of part of the law. The Democratic-controlled Senate has ignored those votes each time.

    House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, acknowledged that the move was largely political, noting that there were 70 new members of the House this year who haven’t had an opportunity to register a vote against the health law. As for why Republicans are intent on repealing the law rather than trying to amend its pieces, Boehner said, “I don’t believe there is a way to fix this and make it acceptable to the American people.”

    Administration officials insist it’s bad politics for Republicans to keep pressing for repeal. They say the American people don’t want to harp on old issues, and cite the law’s popularity among young people, blacks, Hispanics and women – all demographic groups the GOP has struggled to attract in recent elections.

    “It just demonstrates again how out of touch with what the American people want the House Republicans have become,” White House spokesman Jay Carney said Thursday.

    In reality, a massive number of people are actually uninformed about the provisions of the law. A new poll from the Kaiser Family Foundation showed more than 4 in 10 Americans didn’t know the Affordable Health Care Act was still law or was being implemented. About half feel they don’t have enough information about the law to know how it will affect them.

    Under the law, virtually all Americans must carry health insurance starting next year, although most will just keep the coverage they now have through their jobs, Medicare or Medicaid.

  11. May 10, 2013 11:12 am

    How Much do you want to BET Obama will find a way around Republicans taking a stand against DEATH PANELS for you and me?

    Republicans Refuse To Appoint Members To Obamacare’s Most Notorious “DeathPanel”.

    Brett LoGiurato, May 9, 2013

    One of the most politically intense fights over the Affordable Care Act was over the creation of the Independent Payment Advisory Board, infamously dubbed a “death panel” by Republicans during the 2010 elections.

    On Thursday, Republican House Speaker John Boehner and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell signaled that they would keep working to keep opposition alive by doing everything they can to impede the board’s implementation.

    The two leaders wrote a letter to President Barack Obama, notifying him that they would not be submitting any recommendations to the panel because of their opposition to it and to the law in general.

    Here’s the relevant part of their letter explaining why they aren’t offering any recommendations:

    In order to allow supporters to claim that the law’s Medicare cuts would be realized in the future, it tasked IPAB with reducing payments to providers or eliminating payments for certain treatments and procedures altogether. These reduced payments will force providers to stop seeing Medicare patients, the same way an increased number of doctors have stopped taking Medicaid patients. This will lead to access problems, waiting lists and denied care for seniors.

    The unfortunate result is that decisions which impact America’s seniors will be made in the absence of the democratic process, without the system of checks and balances that would normally apply to important matters of public policy. Yet your recent budget called for expanding IPAB by tasking it with making even larger cuts to Medicare than those called for in the health law, even though the trustees of the Medicare program have told us that IPAB’s provider cuts would be “difficult to achieve in practice,” because of the denied care that seniors would experience.

    Though the move will likely play well for Republicans politically, it won’t have much of an effect on the implementation of the health care law, at least for the foreseeable future, according to health care law professors.

    The IPAB is set up to be a 15-member panel. Three members will be chosen by the Republican and Democratic leaders of the House and Senate, and the remaining three are chosen by Obama and the executive branch. All of the members have to be confirmed by the Senate.

    But the IPAB is only needed if Medicare costs are projected to go beyond economic growth plus an additional percentage point in any given year, said Allison Hoffman, an assistant professor of law at UCLA. Right now, Medicare costs aren’t growing fast enough to require the board to decide which cuts to make to Medicare providers.

    “There’s actually no work for the IPAB to do this year,” Hoffman told Business Insider.

    McConnell and Boehner’s letter has “no impact on the ground,” Hoffman said. “It’s a protest move. You know — we’re not going to cooperate with what the law says in this regard.”

  12. May 10, 2013 11:51 am

    Does Obama uphold his ‘Oath of Office’ defending the interests of the American people and our Constitution? It doesn’t appear so, does it?

    Back to our headline… for a moment…

    Obama Admin Appeases Radical Islamic Groups; Ties Hands of FBI

    by Larry O’Connor

    Steve Emerson, seasoned journalist and expert on radical Islam, charged the Obama Administration with “appeasing radical Islamic groups” and tying the hands of prosecutors and FBI agents.

    “You have to understand, this administration has been appeasing radical Islamic groups who front civil rights organizations to the point where prosecutors and FBI agents have had their hands tied,” Emerson told me and Brian Wilson this morning on “Mornings on the Mall” on WMAL-FM in Washington DC.

    When pressed, Emerson elaborated and detailed various actions over the years by the Obama Administration:

    Last night I was dealing with a long-time, one of the top career anti-terrorism prosecutors in the United States. I spoke with him for three hours. I’m not going to go into everything he told me, a lot of it was shocking to me, ok? It ranges from the purge last year in the FBI, directed by (Director Robert) Mueller, as directed by (Attorney General Eric) Holder, to purge any material in the FBI archives education curriculum that was critical of the Muslim Brotherhood, which of course is the mother of all these terrorist groups and the mother of jihad. That’s number one, and number two, the FBI’s been told to ‘engage in community outreach’ with radical mosques and radical islamic groups that are fronts for Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas, they don’t want to do it, but they’ve been told to do it.

    Listen to this video from a brave American journalist:

  13. May 12, 2013 10:11 am

    More information to complicate but explain the reasons why:

    The president and Valerie Jarrett can easily navigate rewriting the facts of events to suit their political agenda keeping the public in the dark while protecting their Muslim affiliates. It is common knowledge, Jarrett is Iranian. Her job is to routinely edit WH press releases sent to news outlets for any facts depicting extremist Muslims responsible for worldwide atrocities.

    This nugget of information explains why it is so easy to bury important facts and why the news outlets have been found getting their information wrong not once but numerous times because the WH is guilty of sequestering the TRUTH! Obama and Jarrett deem their position of authority as protectorates of extremist Muslims instead of protecting the American people.

    Presidents of ABC and CBS News Have Siblings Working at White House With Ties to Benghazi

    “CBS News President David Rhodes and ABC News President Ben Sherwood, both of them have siblings that not only work at the White House, that not only work for President Obama, but they work at the NSC on foreign policy issues directly related to Benghazi.”

    So stated political consultant and media commentator Richard Grenell on Saturday’s Fox News Watch (video follows with transcript and commentary):

    RICHARD GRENELL: I think the media’s becoming the story, let’s face it. CBS News President David Rhodes and ABC News President Ben Sherwood, both of them have siblings that not only work at the White House, that not only work for President Obama, but they work at the NSC on foreign policy issues directly related to Benghazi. Let’s call a spade a spade.

    Let’s also show you why CNN did not go very far in covering these hearings because the CNN deputy bureau chief, Virginia Moseley, is married to Hillary Clinton’s deputy, Tom Nides. It is time for the media to start asking questions why are they not covering this. It’s a family matter for some of them.

    JON SCOTT, HOST: So they don’t want to bring embarrassment upon folks who, who they’re close to?

    GRENELL: Who directly are related to this story. Absolutely. They’re covering for them. There’s no question about it.

    For the record, Ben Sherwood’s sister, Dr. Elizabeth Sherwood-Randall, is the Special Assistant to Barack Obama.

    As for David Rhodes’ brother Ben, he is Obama’s Deputy National Security Advisor for Strategic Communication.

    As reported Friday, Rhodes was a key player in revising the White House’s Benghazi talking points last September:

    In an email dated 9/14/12 at 9:34 p.m. — three days after the attack and two days before Ambassador Rice appeared on the Sunday shows – Deputy National Security Advisor Ben Rhodes wrote an email saying the State Department’s concerns needed to be addressed.

    “We must make sure that the talking points reflect all agency equities, including those of the State Department, and we don’t want to undermine the FBI investigation. We thus will work through the talking points tomorrow morning at the Deputies Committee meeting.”

    After that meeting, which took place Saturday morning at the White House, the CIA drafted the final version of the talking points – deleting all references to al Qaeda and to the security warnings in Benghazi prior to the attack.

    Consider, too, that CBS News executives possibly including Rhodes have allegedly come down on their own investigative reporter Sharyl Attkisson for “wading dangerously close to advocacy on” Benghazi.

    If Attkisson gets the boot, it could very well be with a foot attached to the brother of an Obama administration official directly involved in the cover-up.

    A family matter indeed.

  14. May 12, 2013 10:34 am

    This post by admin @ Hillaryis44.0rg bears repeating, as I agree with admin’s assessment 100%.

    May 11, 2013 at 7:44 pm

    “A lot of those that should have known better could not wait to condemn Hillary Clinton. They still don’t understand that if our operating theory is on target Hillary had to acquiesce to national security cover stories. But it’s easier to jump to conclusions rather than wait for the full evidence to emerge for those that exchange one (Democratic Party) zealotry for another (attack the victim – Hillary – because the Dimocratic Party that betrayed her is corrupt).

    Our operating theory story is gaining traction but we still want the full truth and await more evidence:”
    admin opines:

    “Hillary Clinton was not in charge of security for the CIA compound for which the State Department was merely a cover. So those that are angry at her for the lack of security should get mad at themselves for jumping to foolish conclusions. Hillary Clinton had to stay within the restraints of the cover story for this CIA operation. Notice how even the Republicans on the committee are forced to operate within the restraints of the CIA cover story – which is why they are targeting the State Department not the CIA.”

    “Hillary Clinton is not the culprit here. The man in charge, Barack Obama, is the culprit ultimately responsible, not Hillary Clinton.”

    My opinion in addition to what has been written above is this:

    The only question I care about where the answer could not be Hillary Clinton is this:



  1. An incestual mainstream press- The WH struggling to coverup scandals.. | Pumas Unleashed

Comments are closed.