Skip to content


October 9, 2013

So, the IRS has been used by the Obama White House as a strong arm to intimidate and  persecute people making suggestions  that disagree with Obama’s new Health Care law.  Why? Because the good doctor has been in the HC industry forever and knows Obama’s vision of a HC plan for America will hurt the American people?  If the media refuses posing  questions digging at the Truth why your hc plan doesn’t work for US; then it’s up to  the people to ask questions concerning hc premium costs that will have a life long effect on both our physical and financial health.

(watch the video. Obama and Hatch sit as two porcelain fixtures eerily stoic, attempting to think themselves invisible wishing they could be flushed from listening to Carson’s tortuous Truth. That is, until Dr. Carson mentions GOD.  Hatch’s  head almost falls off in a sort of whiplash after the word GOD said out loud over a microphone permeates his cognition.)

Soon thereafter his speech at the WH Breakfast- Dr Carson received a notice from the IRS scheduling an audit- Coincidental?  I think not-

Dr. Benjamin Carson, the famed neurologist, is an expert in the structuring of  health care management. He knows of which he speaks.  He actually knows how the HC industry can be made affordable for the citizens of our country. And for this knowledge, he is being persecuted by the IRS.   WHY?    Shouldn’t his knowledge of how to improve the performance and administration of the health care system be sought out, and discussed openly with the public, where surely his suggestions for simplification of the existing version of the  HC Law,  he perhaps could design  a reasonable hc system fair to both the provider and the insured?

As soon as Dr Carson said the IRS had visited him consecutively for 3 yrs,  it wasn’t a quantum leap accepting the distinct possibility the IRS had singled him for multiple Tax Audits. Heck, they were able to stumble around stalling the Tea Party applications from qualifying for non-profit status,  denying legitimate organizations 501- 3C status under the law, at the very least  denying equal protection under the law, if not, purposeful ‘discrimination’ violating the law?

Dr. Carson,  ‘BETTER CALL SAUL’~ Or someone like him for a consultation.  Mafia lawyers always know where the bodies are buried.  They know where to look- (and how to defend their clients showing cause why a suit against the government should be instituted. )

Here is Dr Carson explaining his adventure with his IRS audits in the O’Reilly interview”…

Dr. Carson’s response hits it out of the park at the conclusion of the interview after O’Reilly extends a future  invitation to Dr Carson inviting him back to his show for a follow up visit, if and when, his encounters with the IRS should turn nasty.

Dr. Carson responds to O’Reilly’s invitation with this retort- :

“If GOD is for US; who, can stand against US?” -Romans, 8:31.


BTW- If you weren’t a ‘Breaking Bad’ fan,  Saul Goodman  was former hs chemistry teacher turned meth-cook. Walter White’s attorney in the much acclaimed series, Breaking Bad.  Saul was Walter White’s slim shady criminal attorney. A very funny likeable guy.. In fact, director, Vince Gilligan’s ‘Better Call Saul’.. character will be a spin off after the close of the final episodes  and reruns of Breaking Bad…

I personally liked Saul’s character on the show.  Why?  Because Saul was a solution/resolution oriented kinda guy imparting hefty doses of double entendre in his dialog  when interacting with difficult clients..

  1. October 10, 2013 12:00 am

    It appears Obama used confidential taxpayer information for “personal” reasons using the power of the government as a tool at his disposal for his own tax payer funded private detective agency.

    White House, IRS exchanged confidential taxpayer info


    “Ingram headed the scandal-ridden IRS office responsible for overseeing tax-exempt nonprofit groups before leaving to head the agency’s office in charge of Obamacare implementation.”

    Like Bush2, Obama doesn’t fire criminals; he hires them!

  2. October 10, 2013 12:28 am


    ‘Navigators’ raise identity theft risk

  3. Anonymous permalink
    October 14, 2013 12:38 pm

    Dr Carson states the obvious that government does not want you to realize.

  4. October 15, 2013 8:46 am

    Guess who’s exempt from ObamaCare:


    If only We COULD Call Saul, to deal with this nightmare!

  5. October 15, 2013 9:31 am

    Moody’s offers different view on debt limit

    One of the nation’s top credit-rating agencies says that the U.S. Treasury Department is likely to continue paying interest on the government’s debt even if Congress fails to lift the limit on borrowing next week, preserving the nation’s sterling AAA credit rating.

    In a memo being circulated on Capitol Hill Wednesday, Moody’s Investors Service offers “answers to frequently asked questions” about the government shutdown, now in its second week, and the federal debt limit. President Obama has said that, unless Congress acts to raise the $16.7 trillion limit by next Thursday, the nation will be at risk of default.

    Not so, Moody’s says in the memo dated Oct. 7.

    ” We believe the government would continue to pay interest and principal on its debt even in the event that the debt limit is not raised, leaving its creditworthiness intact,” the memo says. “The debt limit restricts government expenditures to the amount of its incoming revenues; it does not prohibit the government from servicing its debt. There is no direct connection between the debt limit (actually the exhaustion of the Treasury’s extraordinary measures to raise funds) and a default.

    The memo offers a starkly different view of the consequences of congressional inaction on the debt limit than is held by the White House, many policymakers and other financial analysts. During a press conference at the White House Tuesday, Obama said missing the Oct. 17 deadline would invite “economic chaos.”

    The Moody’s memo goes on to argue that the situation is actually much less serious than in 2011, when the nation last faced a pitched battle over the debt limit.

    “The budget deficit was considerably larger in 2011 than it is currently, so the magnitude of the necessary spending cuts needed after 17 October is lower now than it was then,” the memo says.

    Treasury Department officials did not immediately respond to requests for comment.


    Of course Treasury Department officials didn;t immediately respond to requests for comment. They have been instructed to keep this fear based charade going adding to all the chaos with their signature train wreck health care plan sign up that epitomizes frustration. In this case, the right hand ‘knows’ what the left hand is doing. Together, with the media’s help, this 3 pronged troika continues browbeating the public outwardly and openly into a mentally paralytic state so tired of dealing with a new crisis every day. People are at the point they are willingly going along with whatever they have been told to do like sheep going over a cliff in the hopes this constant brain drain will straighten itself out and peace of mind will become the ‘new normal’ for the day like it was in the 90s. Little do people realize by entering the O-Care site and attempting to sign up, they are leaving themselves wide open for identity theft by scammer ‘navigators’ who the administration deliberately hired for the specific purpose as ‘fall guys’, (as the nsa records your info) paving the way for the Chicago thugs (dnc) helping themselves to your bank accts and your assets. The Perfect Storm for criminals. The victims provided, the scapegoats identifiable, the invisible hand ( the nsa) leaving no fingerprints for authorities to follow the money- Is there any authority left anymore in our country that isn’t corrupt? Wow… just wow!

    Branson didn’t leave the UK because of Taxes, he left because of what’s coming soon to the UK and the US. The coming lawless violence and destruction of the physical landscape of both countries. Civil strife destroying both countries worse than any thing we have ever seen before. And of course, after the OCare applicants have been culled, drained of their assets and discarded. Martial Law.

  6. October 15, 2013 11:56 am

    Sarah Palin: Barack Obama flirts with impeachment

    By JOSE DELREAL | 10/14/13 6:00 PM EDT


    President Barack Obama is risking “impeachable” offenses with the way he is handling the debt limit debate, former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin said in a post on her Facebook page Monday.

    “Defaulting on our national debt is an impeachable offense, and any attempt by President Obama to unilaterally raise the debt limit without Congress is also an impeachable offense,” Palin wrote.

    In her statement, Palin also accused the president of “scaremongering” on the debt ceiling. She suggested that a default could be averted by paying interest on the debt through daily revenues collected by the United States, an idea that has been recently touted by several conservative voices on the right.

    “It’s also shameful to see him scaremongering the markets with his talk of default. There is no way we can default if we follow the Constitution,” she said, also adding that the president was trying to “furlough reality” when talking about the debt limit.

    Palin was in Washington on Sunday, when she visited the World War II Memorial and protested the government shutdown’s impact on veterans. She will visit Iowa next month for the Faith & Freedom Coalition’s fall fundraiser.


    Sarah Palin is basically saying what I have said in my last post. For now, in my mind’s eye, Obama’s scaremongering of the general public is his biggest UN-impeachable offense to date. If he crosses the line raising the debt ceiling by XO… well, then, it’s up to the House to act. However, we have a president so steeped in guile and cleverness, he would never knowingly make that mistake. Obama will have to rely on pressuring Congress to help him over that hurdle until he can fall back, regroup and come from another angle, (for) sucking the life out millions of Americans left standing. (with their pocketbooks intact). Oh, wait- the next shoe to drop will be his ‘wallet navigators’ at the AHC site who will then be blamed when OCare applicants lose all they have worked for, including their property, when the IRS seizes their Real Estate holdings after they have been broken by this latest multifaceted scheme courtesy of Obama and his Chicago Combine.

  7. October 15, 2013 12:56 pm

    If WE keep remembering WHO WE ARE and do not succumb being lulled to sleep by ALL the LIES by our politicos… WE must fight to survive for our Children’s sakes as well as our Grandkids and those unborn generations yet to come.

  8. October 15, 2013 1:03 pm

    OCare, what it will be, as time goes on-


  9. October 15, 2013 1:19 pm

    Once again, Ulsterman nails it! The answer to the question asked is this… Because the Globilists are coming from a different angle seeing their SYRIAN Missile Strike Party and the removal of Assad fizzled.. What is in store for US- that, I do not know. What I do know is- IT WON’T BE SOMETHING GOOD!


    Obama Administration Prepared To Free Iran From Sanctions – But WHY?

    per Ulsterman

    Iran has been a nation that for decades has sponsored unrest, uncertainty, and terrorism throughout the Middle East and the world. For over thirty years, the United States has imposed economic sanctions upon the country ruled by Islamic hardliners as a means of punishment for that government’s often barbaric and tyrannical rule over its own people. Now, the Obama White House, in a letter from Barack Obama himself, is signaling to the Iranians the United States’ willingness to end ALL sanctions “quickly”. It is a rather stunning move by the administration, bereft of any strength, and dripping with over-eagerness by an American president to appease a radicalized Muslim government that has the blood of Americans and Israelis on its hands.


    (Barack Obama is now making very significant promises to the Iranian-Muslim government)


    (via The Hill)

    White House ready to ‘quickly’ lift sanctions on Iran

    The Obama administration said Monday it’s ready to “quickly” lift sanctions on Iran if the country answers the international community’s concerns about its nuclear program.

    The comments on the eve of new negotiations in Geneva are at odds with the position of many lawmakers of both parties in Congress, who want to increase — not decrease — the pressure on Iran.

    “We are quite ready to move,” a senior administration official told reporters ahead of the negotiations. “If they’re ready to go, we are ready to go.”

    …Asked if that meant that the administration is ready to move “quickly” if Iran does, the official answered: “Yes.” LINK


    What the Obama White House has now done is effectively cut off the knees of both the international community, and members of Congress from both sides of the aisle who believe sanctions against Iran should actually be TOUGHER- not lessened. And yet, Barack Obama and his investors are moving in the opposite direction, promising goodies to the Iranian extremists from a position of appeasement and weakness.


    Perhaps another reminder is in order for those who have either forgot or were unaware – White House Senior Adviser Valerie Jarrett, the woman who multiple reports have indicated Barack Obama seeks guidance and approval on all things, is Iranian-born.

    Just saying… -UM

  10. October 15, 2013 2:35 pm

    Obamacare’s Secret Is Out

    Amy Payne

    October 15, 2013 at 6:30 am

    Share on Facebook

    Timing is everything. And just as Congress’s focus seems to be drifting from Obamacare’s ravages on the economy, Americans are learning the reason this law’s implementation was postponed until after the presidential election.

    That reason is becoming clear as person after person opens the mail. Insurance costs are going up. For many, not just going up—skyrocketing.

    Ross, a married father of three small boys in Florida, tells us his insurance will be going up $525 per month. “I feel completely helpless,” he says.

    Kevin, who also has three small boys, just found out his wife’s individual health insurance premium will be jumping from $79 per month to $311.82 per month.

    “For whom exactly is the Affordable Care Act making care affordable?” asked Kevin, who lives in Alabama.

    But this isn’t all. While people are receiving notices that their premiums are going up or perhaps their health plans are being discontinued, there’s a secret in Obamacare’s exchanges, too.

    One of the reasons the Obamacare website has been so slow and glitchy? It requires people to enter personal information before they’re able to see insurance plan options. Health and Human Services does this so that if you’re eligible for a subsidy, you won’t see the true cost of your health plan.


    Obamacare is laden with mandates that are driving up the cost of health insurance. And it didn’t stop with the original law. Federal bureaucrats are continuing to write more Obamacare regulations. One estimate is that these paper pushers have added 30 words of regulations for every word in the original law.

    No small tweak to Obamacare can fix this. No small tweak can give relief to these hard-working dads who are supporting their families and getting the wind knocked out of them by hundreds of dollars in insurance hikes.

    If Congress does anything less than defund Obamacare, it is turning its back on all of these suffering Americans.


    Proof of President Obama’s Broken Health Care Promise in One Picture

    Kelsey Harris

    October 10, 2013 at 9:55 pm

    Share on Facebook

    Remember when President Obama promised Obamacare would let us Americans keep our current health care plan if we liked it? If you don’t, fast forward this video to about 00:43 and you’ll see him make the pledge.

    That was in 2009, before the government takeover of health care. Now just 10 days into the implementation, Americans are receiving letters from their insurance companies announcing health insurance changes.

    In North Carolina, Blue Cross Blue Shield spokesman Lew Borman confirmed some of their policies were canceled because they “didn’t meet the new federal standards mandated by Obamacare.”

    Outraged by the President’s broken promise? Us, too. Here’s a graphic to help spread the word:


  11. October 15, 2013 3:21 pm

    Senate Decisively Rejects U.N. Arms Trade Treaty

    Ted R. Bromund, Ph.D.

    October 15, 2013 at 10:33 am

    Share on Facebook

    The U.S. Senate responded decisively today to Secretary of State John Kerry’s recent signature on the U.N. Arms Trade Treaty (ATT). In a bipartisan letter led by Senators Jerry Moran (R–KS) and Joe Manchin (D–WV), half of the Senate has officially pledged to oppose the ratification of the ATT. The signatories include every Republican Senator except Mark Kirk (R–IL) and five Democratic Senators. The letter, with its 50 signatories, ends any prospect in the foreseeable future of Senate ratification of the ATT.

    The signatories base their opposition to the treaty on six points, including the Administration’s decision to violate its own red line by backing the adoption of the treaty through a majority-rule vote in the U.N. General Assembly. They also note that, because ATT contains “only a weak non-binding reference to the lawful ownership and use of, and trade in firearms, and recognizes none of these activities, much less individual self-defense, as fundamental individual rights,” it could pose a threat to rights protected under the Second Amendment.

    The signatories are also concerned about the vague standards at the heart of the treaty, which they fear will “steadily subject the U.S. to the influence of internationally-defined norms.” They therefore oppose all treaties that “allow foreign sources of authority to impose judgment or control upon the U.S.” With this letter, half of the Senate has therefore rejected the left’s strategy of using transnational norms to remake the United States and its constitutional order. This rejection will be important in future Senate debates and public consideration of all treaties and other international commitments.

    While the Senate has the lead responsibility for treaties, the House must pass any implementing legislation that is necessary to bring a treaty into effect. Because it has the power of the purse, it is also particularly responsible for funding the implementation of the ATT. A bipartisan letter, paralleling the one in the Senate and led by Representatives Mike Kelly (R–PA) and Collin Peterson (D–MN), has been signed by 181 Members—more than 40 percent of the House.

    These letters are a milestone in the congressional rejection of the ATT, and the public owes a debt of gratitude to the leaders of these letters. But as vital as these letters are, they are not the end of the story. The State Department accepts under the customary international law of treaties that the U.S. is bound not to violate the “object and purpose” of a signed but unratified treaty. Both Senate and House letters reject this assertion.

    The Administration has also implied that it can implement the ATT through its existing authorities and without new appropriations. It is therefore incumbent on the Senate and House to reject this claim (as both the Senate and the House have already done through previous actions), hold appropriate hearings on the treaty and the Administration’s proposed implementation of it, and prepare the way for this President or a future one to “unsign” the ATT and thereby end this dangerous and senseless experiment with a U.N. treaty and its vague standards. Link

  12. Anonymous permalink
    October 15, 2013 10:00 pm

    Folks, Don’t forget to tune in the National Geographic channel @ 8pm est for a special report on October 27, 2013 for a purview of what it would be like to be without power/electricity Nationwide for 10 days.

    Rumor has it there is an event planned as a drill sometime in November. Is this True? I have no idea. But it couldn’t hurt to watch a hypothetical on 10/27.

  13. October 16, 2013 11:17 am



Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: